Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Shirasaki

macrumors P6
May 16, 2015
15,614
10,918
What video?!
Maybe “how large” is better in this context. Format is irrelevant.
However, somehow, If video is transferred by syncing using iTunes, the transfer speed is magically faster than direct transfer. Can’t prove it though.
 

max2

macrumors 603
Original poster
May 31, 2015
6,374
2,027
3 to 4 GB per a video.
[doublepost=1497927530][/doublepost]4k videos look stunning on the new iPad Pro 10.5!
 

max2

macrumors 603
Original poster
May 31, 2015
6,374
2,027
I figured once I get my 506 GB full of all my media I want on my device it will be much easier and quicker to update it as time goes on. Deleting one media file then replacing it without another new one.
 

Skika

macrumors 68030
Mar 11, 2009
2,999
1,246
Itunes wifi sync is flawed because it still goes through/requires a router. They should have used, or updated it, to the same ad hoc based standard as the Airdrop.
 

BeatCrazy

macrumors 601
Jul 20, 2011
4,960
4,279
Itunes wifi sync is flawed because it still goes through/requires a router. They should have used, or updated it, to the same ad hoc based standard as the Airdrop.

Sync is pretty important, and going through a router means it can use TCP/IP. I think - if AirDrop drops packets, the transfer will fail and need to restart from the beginning. Which could be a disaster if you're trying to sync 30GB+.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.