Islamic State fighters using US arms:

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by jkcerda, Sep 8, 2014.

  1. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #1
    http://news.yahoo.com/islamic-state-fighters-using-us-arms-study-085735376.html

    it was so kind of Obama to arm the rebels, what could have gone wrong?
     
  2. Happybunny macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    #2
  3. bradl macrumors 68040

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #3
  4. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #4
    makes no difference really, any President who armed the enemy should be charged with treason, that includes Bush, Ronnie is long gone.
     
  5. bradl macrumors 68040

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #5
    Actually, it does. Not to defend him, but you went straight for Obama, without knowing if Obama did this to begin with. How do we know that it was Obama that did it, when any arms could be stamped with "property of US Govt", nor knowing how and when said arms made it to that part of the world.

    BL.
     
  6. zioxide macrumors 603

    zioxide

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    #6
    Well, if you want to be technical about it, in this case we didn't "arm the enemy". We armed the moderate Syrian rebels and the weapons were then captured by ISIS.


    Regardless, this is just another incident in the long line of the US government bending over for the military industrial complex.

    You ask why we continue to arm people like this? MONEY. The Dick Cheneys of the world are greedy ****s who love their money and don't care who they sell out to get richer.

    Defense contractors want more money -> defense contractors "lobby" (read: bribe) the government -> we buy more guns and arm the "rebels" -> area destabilizes and creates more cluster **** -> then revert back to step 1.

    It's a vicious circle of the military industrial complex. Eisenhower warned us, but Americans are too stupid to pick up a ****ing history book and realize that.

    Doesn't matter who you elect as President, democrat, republican, whatever, as long as them and Congress are bought and paid for by the defense industry this will continue to happen.
     
  7. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #7
    Not only did ISIS get weapons we supplied "moderate" Syrian rebels, the Iraqi Army, when confronted by ISIS, just turned and ran, leaving all the goodies we gave them behind for ISIS.

    So if you're following from home, we're bombing our own weapons. The military industrial complex couldn't have orchestrated it any better themselves.
     
  8. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #8
    Obama is the one currently in charge. still makes no difference WHO did it, they ALL should be tried for treason.
     
  9. bradl macrumors 68040

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #9
    Got it. If arms went over to ISIS that were there from Iran Contra, Obama is to blame.

    If arms went to ISIS that were there from Desert Storm, Obama is to blame.

    If arms went over there that were left behind from Abu Ghraib during Iraqi Freedom, Obama is to blame.

    All of which occurred before Obama was POTUS.

    In fact, the only way you would be entirely correct is when Obama sent arms over for the rebels in Syria, which IS was fighting with them, and IS kept them to do what they are doing now.

    But any other instance, we need to remember to go by your fuzzy logic above. We'll make note of that.

    BL.
     
  10. zioxide macrumors 603

    zioxide

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    #10
    Oh please, this is a feeble minded appeal to emotion. You're blaming the puppet for the doing of the puppeteers.

    How about instead of calling for some show trial that will fix NOTHING, we start demanding for banning private money in elections? How about we make legalized bribery ("lobbying") a felony?

    The US government is bought and paid for by big business, and defense contractors/the military industrial complex are the biggest offender. Until that problem is fixed, it doesn't matter who the figurehead is in the executive branch, you'll never fix the problem.
     
  11. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #11
    what part of jail them ALL is hard to understand? must you excuse Obama at everything?
     
  12. aerok macrumors 65816

    aerok

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    #12
    Reading the article, it seems the weapons were given by the USA in different occasions. Some were supplied to arm the Iraqui army (Could be under Bush or Obama) and some of the rockets are from the 80s that were made in Yugoslavia.

    The M79 rockets used by ISIS were made in the USA but were given to the Saudis.

    ----------

    The OP only blamed Obama. Must you blame Obama for everything?
     
  13. Southern Dad macrumors 65816

    Southern Dad

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Location:
    Georgia
    #13
    To make it worse, these are not obsolete weapons. This is an M16A4 with an 8 digit serial number. The ammunition in this picture was manufactured in March of 2007. In the picture is a Garmin eTrex H which came out in 2007 or 2008.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  14. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #14
    We create the terrorist we fight. Awesome way to stay at war
     
  15. aerok macrumors 65816

    aerok

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    #15
    They would've exsited with or without those weapons. They just happened to be better armed now.
     
  16. zin macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #16
    That first picture looks forged. I don't know, the U.S. Government Property logo looks weird and doesn't look real.
     
  17. Southern Dad macrumors 65816

    Southern Dad

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Location:
    Georgia
    #17
    The logo would be Colt not the US Govt. And that looks just like many M16's that I've held over the years. I have no doubt that it is an authentic M16A4. I can't attest to where it was taken.
     
  18. lannister80 macrumors 6502

    lannister80

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    #18
    Those pics are from the DAILY MAIL.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...y-kit-claim-seized-fleeing-soldiers-Iraq.html

    May as well be from the Inquirer.

    And you're right, the "stamp" does not line up with the rest of the image. The "horizon lines" (or whatever you call that term in art where parallel lines all point to a disappearing point) don't match.
     
  19. noodlemanc macrumors regular

    noodlemanc

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Location:
    Australasia
    #19
    And then people want the U.S government to step in and "save" the world from these people. How ironic.
     
  20. Solomani macrumors 68030

    Solomani

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Location:
    Alberto, Canado
    #20
    Which makes him the most culpable ….. because he had every opportunity to learn from the mistakes of his predecessors (e.g. Dubya). But Obama did not learn. Instead, he chose to repeat their same mistakes.

    Hence, Obama deserves all the blame he gets. But hey, that won't stop POTUS from sending more American arms and hardware to that Saudi King, who will only channel even more arms and military support to his Fundamentalist Wahabbi pals at the Syrian Al Nusra Front (a rebel jihadist front only half-as-bad as ISIS :rolleyes: )
     
  21. aaronvan Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #21
    The M-16A1 needs some babying to remain functional. ISIL will jam them after one or two magazines and revert to their AK's.

    The US gifted hundreds of thousands of old M-16's to the Iraqi and Afghan armies, even knowing that they were perfectly comfortable with the AK and are both fundamentally incapable of performing maintenance on their weapons and equipment. However, it was a fast way for the U.S. to unload a lot of old weapons (I guess it never occurred to anyone that we could just melt them down instead of contributing to the global glut of small arms) and make a buck at the same time.
     
  22. LethalWolfe macrumors G3

    LethalWolfe

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #22
    They say the enemy of your enemy is your friend but what happens when that friend then becomes your enemy? For decades world powers (U.S., U.S.S.R., etc.,) have fought proxy wars and/or tried to instill/encourage 'friendly' governments in the Middle East but you can't defeat an ideology like you can the standing army of a nation. When the ideology is basically "We want to kill you" there's not much diplomacy that can go on. If we try and stamp out entities like ISIS they just morph into a new movement that uses our military intervention as a recruiting tool. If we try non-military measures then they spin our lack of military involvement as a sign of weakness/cowardice and use that as a recruiting tool.



    The stamped logo and characters might look weird because of the proximity and angle of the camera flash. Below is an image I found on Google of a similar model weapon.

    [​IMG]
     
  23. Solomani macrumors 68030

    Solomani

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Location:
    Alberto, Canado
    #23
    IMHO, Islamic militancy will grind to a halt the moment Toyota stops global production of its Toyota Hilux pickup trucks. The Islamists seem to love those things. They depend on them, actually, and use them as personnel transports as well as mobile machine-gun platforms or mobile rocket launchers.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  24. mrkramer macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #24
    Obama has armed rebels in Syria, and the Iraqi army which lost a lot of stuff, so even if this particular weapon was older he still should have learned from the mistakes of past presidents and not sent more arms to the region.

    Did they ever provide a definition of what a moderate rebel was other than someone fighting Assad? And if they did did they ever say how they were guranteeing that only those ones got the weapons?
     
  25. Solomani macrumors 68030

    Solomani

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Location:
    Alberto, Canado
    #25
    Assad was never a threat to the USA, nor did Assad ever have any military capability to "defeat" even a single American battalion. The USA was simply coerced by Saudi Arabia (arch-rival of Assad) to help gang up on Assad (at a time when rebel-jihadists were tearing up his country). Obama was tricked once again by the serpent-tongued Saudis. The Saudis are very successful in coercing US Presidents to do the dirty work for them.
     

Share This Page