Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

CLS727

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Feb 5, 2018
255
374
Love it on my new 12.9" iPad Pro.... obviously they will dump lightning and go that way eventually for the phones... they should have just done it now.

Now I'm stuck with 2 different chargers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VMMan
Well the USB c port sucks so I hope not. Who wants to pay 1000 bucks for a phone that will have a broken connector in a couple of years. Lightning never fails.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lyn2012
What are you talking about. I've had countless lightning ports and connectors fail on me over the years. And countless more 30-pin connectors and ports before that.

Then wait until you get your hands on USB C. Just do a search on ’usb c connector loose’.
 
Then wait until you get your hands on USB C. Just do a search on ’usb c connector loose’.
That's exactly my point. All mechanical connectors will fail eventually. At least in my experience, I haven't found lightning to be immune to these failures, so that shouldn't be an impediment to Apple making the switch.
 
That's exactly my point. All mechanical connectors will fail eventually. At least in my experience, I haven't found lightning to be immune to these failures, so that shouldn't be an impediment to Apple making the switch.

Then why not lightning on the new iPad Pro ?
 
I’m not against USB C, it’s just the connector that has a bad design, it fails after moderate usage. Micro USB had the same problem, and the old 30 pin apple connector was also pretty bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HappyIntro
I'm all for USB C on all devices. Given that all connectors and plugs will fail, I'd rather see Apple standardize around one plug/connector. Since the future is clearly USB C, I'm glad they've started moving iOS devices that way.

Right that's my point. If USB-C is "clearly the future" ... then why not all new devices already?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr and VMMan
Ive had numerous devices all with USB C. None have failed. None had had issues. Same with lightning chargers. If you Google anything "problem" you'll find people complaint about it that's life. Everything can fail.

But when the rest of devices are using usb c and apple is the only one using a proprietary method it only makes sense to switch. Much easier for the end user to have one cable that can charge or carry data from everything. It's about ease of use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timeconsumer
Well the USB c port sucks so I hope not. Who wants to pay 1000 bucks for a phone that will have a broken connector in a couple of years. Lightning never fails.

I’ve had Lightning ports fail in previous phones of mine though.
 
This makes me wonder if gen 2 AirPods will be usb-c/AirPower ready hmmmmm

Maybe with an adapter. I foresee the AirPods retaining lightning. As for the AirPower, pure vapor at this point, which I’m thinking if the AirPower relaunches, they had to re-engineer the internals from the allegedly rumored overheating it was experiencing with the side-by-side coils. I know there were many members upset that the AirPower did not launch, but I’m glad it didn’t, because if it had experienced _any_ overheating, it would have been a complete catastrophe for Apple and not good publicity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tromboneaholic
Maybe with an adapter. I foresee the AirPods retaining lightning. As for the AirPower, pure vapor at this point, which I’m thinking if the AirPower relaunches, they had to re-engineer the internals from the allegedly rumored overheating it was experiencing with the side-by-side coils. I know there were many members upset that the AirPower did not launch, but I’m glad it didn’t, because if it had experienced _any_ overheating, it would have been a complete catastrophe for Apple and not good publicity.
I was reading an article by John Gruber who suggested that Apple might stick with lighting for iPhone for several reasons. He was looking forward to see what charging method the updated AirPods were going to use (if they had arrived this year) as a clue to Apple's intentions.

One reason he thinks Apple will stick to lightning for the foreseeable future was due to battery cases. He mentioned the reason for the ugly bump on the battery case Apple made was to avoid interference to the antennas. According to Gruber, Apple has never approved a battery case under the MFi program because if the battery case interfered with reception, people would think it was a problem with the phone. With USB-C, Apple would lose this type of control.

He also speculated that the benefits of USB-C might be something Apple keeps for the higher end iPads, and keeps the entry-level models at lightning.
 
What would make it something like a mistake?

I consider removing the headphone jack and the lightning port at same time a mistake. Especially when releasing new phones a month earlier that still have lightning ports. At least then one could use the same wired headphones with the lightning port without the need for dongles. Perhaps they could have kept both products on the same page being that they released so close together. Just my opinion on the matter, possibly why it maybe considered a mistake by some.
 
Well the USB c port sucks so I hope not. Who wants to pay 1000 bucks for a phone that will have a broken connector in a couple of years. Lightning never fails.
Apple genius said my iPhone can’t complete a firmware restore because the lightning port pin is corroded. I have a bricked iPhone after a failed update. Lightning port failed.
 
Looks like there a problems with the WLAN using the USB-C to headphone adapter (see iPad Pro reports). If this happens with the iPhone I am really in trouble because I am using my wired headphones much more with my iPhone than with the iPad....
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.