Italian scientists guilty of manslaughter

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by jnpy!$4g3cwk, Oct 23, 2012.

  1. jnpy!$4g3cwk macrumors 65816


    Feb 11, 2010
    I guess I thought this would just go away. Recall the seismologists who were accused of not predicting the L'Aquila earthquake? Convicted!
  2. samiwas macrumors 68000

    Aug 26, 2006
    Atlanta, GA
    That's I don't even know how to get into that mindset.
  3. Don't panic macrumors 603

    Don't panic

    Jan 30, 2004
    having a drink at Milliways
  4. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6


    Aug 17, 2007
  5. MorphingDragon, Oct 23, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2012

    MorphingDragon macrumors 603


    Mar 27, 2009
    The World Inbetween
    From my italian friend.
  6. decafjava macrumors 68030


    Feb 7, 2011
    Explains a lot, MorphingDragon, thank your friend for us.
  7. Happybunny macrumors 68000

    Sep 9, 2010
    Actually the title is not correct: they were convicted because one guy who was studying the radium relation with the earthquakes said that a big one was coming, tho these experts didn't want to listen to him and went to a fake meeting (it actually last only 5mins) where they were supposed to talk about keeping the population safe. Anyway they didn't and agreed to repeat what Bertolaso (The Chief of Civilian Protection, NOT a scientist) said: that there was no big trouble and that it was better to have 1000 little earthquakes because that meant that there was no opportunity for the big one to come.

    Later Bertolaso's call were recorded and there are proofs that all the meeting was just a media tic event, and nobody did anything to actually discuss if people were safe. Result: 309 people died.
    So, they were convicted not because they didn't predict the earthquake, but because they didn't give a **** about it, even if THAT was their job.

    Now that makes a lot more sense.:cool:
  8. jnpy!$4g3cwk thread starter macrumors 65816


    Feb 11, 2010
    This previous story differs somewhat from the narrative from your Italian friend:

    So, by this account, the commission met "for about an hour", said something like "we already told you the risk was high, but, the tremors and gas emissions don't change the fact that we can't tell you if a major quake might hit right now, or, any random time in the next 60 years", and, left. They were speaking like seismologists. I guess they should have had a social psychologist in the group who could assess better how people will react to various outcomes. The mayor reacted differently, like a physician who orders extra tests to cover himself.

    But, I still don't see how the seismologists can be guilty of manslaughter. If the seismologists were prophets in a primitive society, it would be different -- then it would have been part of the job they signed up for, and, they would have to be stoned to death.
  9. HarryPot, Oct 23, 2012
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2012

    HarryPot macrumors 6502a

    Sep 5, 2009
    Six years of prison for not predicting an earthquake!

    I missed that this was posted already here. Thanks to the mods for moving it.

    But I agree, this is crazy.:eek:
  10. niuniu macrumors 68020


    Mar 29, 2009
    A man of the people. The right sort of people.
    Funny how one of the committee was comparing himself to Galileo, yet unlike Galileo he was wrong about the outcome.

    These guys seemed to be reassuring the locals that everything would be fine, which they could do by being dismissive of evidence to the contrary.

    I don't think they were jailed for not predicting an earthquake. There will have been a duty of care established at some point and the judge will have found them in breach of it based on something they did or didn't do at this meeting. Maybe they were reckless or acting unreasonably.
  11. iJohnHenry macrumors P6


    Mar 22, 2008
    On tenterhooks
    OMG, now the Litigious States of America has something new to shoot for.

    Remember, the USGS, as a government agency, has a much shorter Statute of Limitations for the filing of lawsuits.


Share This Page