It's technically not the iPhone 5.

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by zmbchclt, Apr 12, 2012.

  1. zmbchclt macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2012
    Location:
    England, North East.
    #1
    I know we don't know what Apple will decide to call the next release, but we it's seems to naturally be called the iPhone 5 for now, but it'll technically be the iPhone 6.

    I'm just throwing in my 2 pence, and I'll put bets in that it follows in the steps of the iPad and is 'The New iPhone'

    Anyway, that's all. Hah!
     
  2. -aggie- macrumors P6

    -aggie-

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Location:
    Where bunnies are welcome.
    #2
  3. Interstella5555 macrumors 603

    Interstella5555

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    #3
    If you want to get technical about it, the iPhone 3G wasn't the third one either. I know it's impossible to fathom that a company would have their own internal way of naming their products, but there you go.
     
  4. labman macrumors 604

    labman

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Location:
    Mich near Detroit
  5. zmbchclt thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2012
    Location:
    England, North East.
    #5
    It's not impossible, stop ruddy assuming. I don't know where you decided to bring the 3G up, I'm not a complete mong and know it was the 2nd.

    I can see why people get irate on this forum. No one and seem to voice their opinion without getting a an onslaught of hatred and arguments.

    Everyone's entitled to the opinion and if that's opposite to someone else, then that's fine, but my god there's way of going about it, and on here it's ALWAYS the wrong way.
     
  6. pooleman Suspended

    pooleman

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Location:
    Eastern CT
    #6
    picard-facepalm-o.gif
     
  7. james92se macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
  8. -aggie- macrumors P6

    -aggie-

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Location:
    Where bunnies are welcome.
    #8
    What was angry about his comment? You seem angry, actually.
     
  9. eawmp1 macrumors 601

    eawmp1

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Location:
    FL
    #9
    Mods, can anyone who starts a thread on this get an automatic lifetime ban? :confused:;):D
     
  10. pooleman Suspended

    pooleman

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Location:
    Eastern CT
    #10
    I second this.
     
  11. Shadowbech macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    #11
    I, Third this.
     
  12. zmbchclt thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2012
    Location:
    England, North East.
  13. pooleman Suspended

    pooleman

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Location:
    Eastern CT
    #15
    You started this thread. You get no vote.
     
  14. Shrink macrumors G3

    Shrink

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Location:
    New England, USA
    #16
    Oh, crap...not this bull***t again!!!
     

    Attached Files:

  15. cynics macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    #17
    You should say "in my opinion" instead of "technically" if you are voicing an opinion. :)
     
  16. Givmeabrek macrumors 68030

    Givmeabrek

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Location:
    NY
  17. pooleman Suspended

    pooleman

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Location:
    Eastern CT
    #19
    I think we have a consensus. Zmbchclt, you are hereby banished from the Macrumors community, never to return.
     
  18. jca24 macrumors 6502a

    jca24

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    Location:
    DFW
    #20
    Dude, really?? Next time bring something to the table thats worth looking at!

    :apple:
     
  19. Pomeless macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    #21
    [​IMG]

    Walk it off with your 2 pence!

    Anyway, that's all. Hah!
     
  20. Pez555 macrumors 68000

    Pez555

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2010
    #22
    to be fair, you have brought up a point that has been discussed to death.
     
  21. LostSoul80 macrumors 68020

    LostSoul80

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    #23
    Thanks OP for sharing such an important information with us.
     
  22. verwon macrumors 68030

    verwon

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Location:
    Seattle
    #24
    ^^^This.....a million times over!!!!
     
  23. DeusInvictus7 macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2008
    Location:
    Kitchener, Ontario
    #25
    That's a bad example. The 3G was only referring to the 3G radio. That's all. Apple has only ever named an iPhone based on the generation, the iPhone 4.

    Apple will definitely call the next iPhone...wait for it... iPhone. The proof is in iPad. And for good reason, they can't just keep numbering the phones and then adding S's. They've got to stop it at some point, and sooner the better.
     

Share This Page