No, don't think of the dot as a decimal, just think of it as a separator. So you'll sometimes get version numbers like 12.6.14, etc.iJon said:Well in software development terms, wouldn't .10 still be .1 or do developers do things differently?
That is true, didn't think of it like that. I still doubt we will see .10. I think 5 will our next version.wordmunger said:No, don't think of the dot as a decimal, just think of it as a separator. So you'll sometimes get version numbers like 12.6.14, etc.
Again, with software numbering, it's not a decimal, it's a dot. the version isn't 4 and one tenth, its version 4, 10th revision. So yes, the version after 4.9 would be 4.10, as weird as that looks.generationxwing said:iTunes 4.1
They're all the same number. If there's a version after 4.9, but before 5.0, I'd assume it'd be something like 4.9.1. Or 4.91.
No, no mistake. iTunes 4.9 is due for release in the next several weeks, that is well-known by now. iTunes 4.9 will probably be showcased and released at MacWorld Boston (11-14 July 2005). MacWorld Boston 2005 is going to focus heavily on music. So releasing iTunes 4.9 at MacWorld Boston makes sense. Releasing iTunes 5.0 then is also possible (and makes sense) if they can ramp up production and finish it before then. However, that is less than a month away, so not likely.iminimac said:4.10 u say? whats with that gap for 4.9 or did you make a mistake
what do people think itunes new features will be?
i think podcasting will come and improved features
when itunes 5 comes out i hope that you will be able to download music videos and possibly movies off itms
Well..., since iLife '04 = 2004, and iLife '05 = 2005, then iLife '06 probably = 2006.Manzana said:yeah, this should be itunes 5! and when is ilife 06 coming out...haven't heard about it.
Aah, source you say? So you want a source. Well sometimes we all just need to have faith and believe. People are just way too cynical and distrustful. What the world needs is more naivety and gullibility. Yeah, that's it. That's the ticket! And I got your source hanging right here.Daveway said:What's the source?