JFK Assasination

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by citizenzen, Nov 22, 2013.

?

Who killed Kennedy

  1. Oswald Alone

    26 vote(s)
    42.6%
  2. Mob

    4 vote(s)
    6.6%
  3. CIA

    7 vote(s)
    11.5%
  4. Other

    7 vote(s)
    11.5%
  5. Don't Know

    17 vote(s)
    27.9%
  1. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #1
    Bottom line question ...

    Was Oswald the "lone gunman"?

    Mob hit?

    CIA?

    Or ...?
     
  2. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #2
    I've had it up to here with JFK already. Do we ever let anything go in this country?
     
  3. Tomorrow macrumors 604

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
    #3
    For many years I was certain that there was some kind of conspiracy, or at least a cover-up after the fact. The more I read, the more I looked into it, the more sense it made that it was Oswald alone.

    I have never read the Warren Commission report, but I have read many other texts - from many differing points of view.
     
  4. Mousse macrumors 68000

    Mousse

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Location:
    Flea Bottom, King's Landing
    #4
  5. Huntn, Nov 22, 2013
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2013

    Huntn macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #5
    It all boils down to what source or conspiracy theory you want to believe.
     
  6. sigmadog macrumors 6502a

    sigmadog

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Location:
    near Spokane, WA
    #6
    I'll never forget where I was when I first heard about the JFK assassination anniversary.
     
  7. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #7
    The Warren Commission was right. However, it was extralegal if not outright illegal. Those that took Kennedy's body out of Texas should have been prosecuted for obstruction of justice. The horrible thing is that if Oswald had survived, the interference with collection of evidence from Kennedy's body might very well have laid the legal basis for acquitting him. It is also ironic that the WC was meant to suppress speculation, but because it was extralegal it only spawned suspicion. History will treat it as a massive mistake.
     
  8. Huntn macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #8
    Was a complete autopsy not performed? What was obstructed? I ask not as a challenge, but for information.
     
  9. TheAppleFairy macrumors 68020

    TheAppleFairy

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Location:
    The Clinton Archipelago unfortunately
    #9
  10. bradl macrumors 68040

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #10
    I just found this, which would be interesting to follow.

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/codeswitch...xisted-in-1963-follow-live-tweets-from-nov-22

    They just hit the time, down to the second, when JFK and Connally were shot. It's been interesting to follow.

    http://twitter.com/todayin1963

    EDIT: Interesting side note: I didn't know that C.S. Lewis died the same day.

    BL.
     
  11. oddnendz macrumors 6502

    oddnendz

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    #11
    and Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World
     
  12. whoknows87 macrumors 6502a

    whoknows87

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    Location:
    S.Florida
    #12
    Question remains why?

    What was Oswald motive?
     
  13. Peace macrumors Core

    Peace

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
    #13
    The assassination of a president can have a myriad of motives. He's the president.
     
  14. Tomorrow macrumors 604

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
    #14
    An autopsy was performed, but the obstruction was that the Secret Service and/or FBI took the President's body away from the Dallas P.D. and back to Washington for an autopsy at Annapolis.

    This doesn't sound like much in and of itself, but back in those days, it was not a federal crime to shoot the President - it was simply a murder committed in Texas, and Dallas P.D. and the State of Texas had sole jurisdiction.

    VulchR brings up a very interesting point, had Oswald not been murdered himself by Ruby, a good defense lawyer may have been able to completely pick that particular misstep apart and make a decent push for an acquittal on those grounds.

    I read that book several years ago. While definitely interesting, he gets some of his facts quite wrong, most notably the size (diameter) of the entry wound, and the position of Kennedy's head at the time of impact.

    Oswald was dishonorably discharged from the Marines, and he tried (and failed) to defect to the U.S.S.R., who wouldn't have him. He wanted to be a "somebody," but he had always been a "nobody." A documentary I saw recently on CNN said that Oswald wanted to do something that would see him be remembered for 10,000 years, or something to that effect.
     
  15. TheAppleFairy macrumors 68020

    TheAppleFairy

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Location:
    The Clinton Archipelago unfortunately
    #15

    Like trying to impress a girl. (that's been tried once ;))
     
  16. Peace macrumors Core

    Peace

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
    #16
    Yup.And that girl turned out to be gay.

    Poor guy. did it for nothing.

    :p
     
  17. TheAppleFairy macrumors 68020

    TheAppleFairy

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Location:
    The Clinton Archipelago unfortunately
    #17
    That might be another fantasy for him. :p
     
  18. 63dot, Nov 22, 2013
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2013

    63dot macrumors 603

    63dot

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2006
    Location:
    norcal
    #18

    Lone gunman?


    Yes, because evidence suggests bullets from one direction and Oswald had the skill to pull it off. He was the perfect lone gunman with chip on his shoulder and Marxist leanings.

    Mob hit?

    Maybe, then I would look at Meyer Lansky. The only thing that may implicate him is he had the most motive and Jack Ruby possibly having ties to New Orleans organized crime syndicate of Lansky. Lansky had the resources to pull it off, get it blamed on Oswald if Oswald was indeed innocent or not the planner of the assassination, and cover it up. His ability to elude federal authorities and leave no paper trail made him the best equipped to do it if it was a conspiracy with Oswald only being the shooter and nothing else.

    CIA/FBI?

    Very unlikely but Hoover wasn't a fan of JFK.

    Johnson?

    Probably not. One can point out his wife's financial ties to Bell Helicopter who did handsomely in the Vietnam war.
     
  19. Huntn macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #19
    He could of been solo and/or paid by the mob/Castro/?, but I don't know if they ever located any unusual sources of income. Or he simply had higher ambitions than shooting up a movie theater.
     
  20. Sydde macrumors 68020

    Sydde

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    #20
    He also wrote The Doors of Perception from which a relatively obscure group of musicians and a lost-in-the-fog-of-history poet took the name for their little bar band. The book was about grokking on peyote.
     
  21. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6

    ucfgrad93

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado
    #21
    Nothing I've ever seen has convinced me it was anything other than Oswald.
     
  22. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #22
    Oswald was the lone shooter. The question is was he put up to it. We know who shot him, we don't know if Oswald was just some loner with an agenda or were there others involved. There is still a lot the CIA hasn't released on Oswald.
     
  23. localoid macrumors 68020

    localoid

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Location:
    America's Third World
    #23
    All (credible) evidence certainly seems to support three shots fired by a lone gunman (Oswald).

    The only believable evidence to the contrary was the Dallas Police Department Dictabelt recording that seemed to offer acoustical evidence of a fourth shot.

    The Dictabelt recording was the reason why the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations' 1979 report concluded: "Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that at least two gunmen fired at the President. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations."

    However, an analysis of the Dictabelt recording, made after the HSCA hearing, concluded that these assumptions were unfounded, because that evidence relied on an incorrect timeline, i.e., the sounds were actually recorded one minute after the assassination had taken place.

    The only question in my mind is whether Oswald was a lunatic or not.

    If mentally unstable, then voices in his head may have told him to shoot Kennedy, etc.

    If not, then did someone, or some group, have a hand in (at least) suggesting that Oswald should seize any opportunity to assassinate Kennedy, or even worse, was there someone or some group that provided him with more formal forms of support, training, or encouragement, etc.
     
  24. citizenzen thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #24
    Just went frame by frame through the Zapruder film, and I've seen enough evidence to convince me that the fatal head shot does indeed come from behind.

    I'm ready to change my vote and say now that it was LHO as the lone shooter.
     
  25. Sydde macrumors 68020

    Sydde

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    #25
    I went through the film last week, and my conclusion was, "hey, WFC? time to put this thing away and get on with real stuff, like, that matters now, today."
     

Share This Page