Judge Rules That Abstinence-Only Classes Don't Count As Sex Ed

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by mudslag, May 13, 2015.

  1. mudslag macrumors regular

    mudslag

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    #1
    http://thinkprogress.org/health/2015/05/13/3658139/california-judge-abstinence-only/



    Good, teaching ignorance is not an excuse.
     
  2. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #2
    Bravo.

     
  3. xmichaelp macrumors 68000

    xmichaelp

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    #3
    Wonderful.

    I bet some in the party of stupid are upset about this though... :(
     
  4. Thraun macrumors regular

    Thraun

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Location:
    Abbotsford, BC
    #4
    This seems very obvious. Abstinence-only teachings even being called sex-ed is totally oxymoronic, as it is neither sexual nor education.
     
  5. SLC Flyfishing Suspended

    SLC Flyfishing

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #5
    I would think Democrats would applaud this decision.
     
  6. Scepticalscribe Contributor

    Scepticalscribe

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Location:
    The Far Horizon
    #6
    Yes, bravo.

    Only troglodytes believe that ignorance is bliss.
     
  7. aaronvan Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #7
    Sex ed should be limited to keeping your chastity belt clean.
     
  8. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
  9. dec. Suspended

    dec.

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2012
    Location:
    Toronto
  10. FieldingMellish Suspended

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    #10
    The sex ed that seems to work unfortunately is young unwed mothers who learn how many more benefits they get with the more children they have.
     

Share This Page