Judicial Watch's questions for Hillary

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Herdfan, Aug 30, 2016.

  1. Herdfan macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
  2. aaronvan Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #2
  3. zin macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #3
    She'll leave it until the last minute and submit the answers in crayon.
     
  4. 1458279 Suspended

    1458279

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Location:
    California
    #4
    It can't be very effective because it's very hard to trap someone without interaction. If there's a trap question, the answer will be either too vague to have meaning or she'll respond with "I don't understand the question".

    These questions will be answered by some of the best professional lawyers the US has ever produced. They can even redefine the meaning of the word "is".

    clintonmeaningIS.png
     
  5. Jess13 Suspended

    Jess13

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    #5
    Question 25 haha. This is UNDER OATH.


    Identify all communications between you and Brian Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any emails in your clintonemail.com email account, including any instruction or direction to Mr. Pagliano about the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of emails in your account when transferring the clintonemail.com email system to any alternate or replacement server. For each communication, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the communication.
     
  6. Zombie Acorn macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #6
    Does anything force her to answer this directly? I'm just expecting a bunch of "what you mean a cloth?" Responses
     
  7. NewdestinyX macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    #7
    I heard today too - that one of "the 30" most damaging emails in question contained classified data that could have led to the Benghazi attacks.. Yikes?

    Is that just ultra right crank stuff or reality. I'm center right. Not a "crank".. But I want to know if this lady's stupidity was part of the reason those men died.
     
  8. Jess13 Suspended

    Jess13

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    #8
    I don’t have the answer, all that I know is these are under oath and due before this October.
     
  9. ibookg409 Suspended

    ibookg409

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Location:
    Portsmouth, NH
    #9
    What difference, at this point, does it make?!
     
  10. NewdestinyX macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    #10
    LMFAO !!!
     
  11. tgara macrumors 6502a

    tgara

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2012
    Location:
    Somewhere in the Delta Quadrant
    #11
    Of course, and here will be some of her responses:

    Objection, the question is overly broad.

    Objection, the question relates to a privileged communication.

    Objection, the answer to the question relates to protection of national security information which is expressly exempted from FOIA requests.

    I cannot confirm or deny.....
     
  12. NewdestinyX macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    #12
    Well you know how this stuff works as well as I do… None of the content of that under-oath questioning will come out before November 8. So if she wins we'll be heading right into impeachment proceedings … Won't that be fun… Clinton Impeachment Proceedings, The Sequel!
     
  13. tgara macrumors 6502a

    tgara

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2012
    Location:
    Somewhere in the Delta Quadrant
    #13
    And despite this being a FOIA request, her attorneys will ask to have the records sealed.
     
  14. NewdestinyX macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    #14
    Of course! This is the Clintons! They have a different set of rules.
     
  15. 1458279 Suspended

    1458279

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Location:
    California
    #15
    It's been a while, but basically they has a whole set of rules they go thru. She can do down the "contempt" route to buy time, I've seen it done. They get a slap on the wrist.

    Given that the answers are due before the election, she is in a bit of a spot. I'm sure her answers will be known before the election.
    --- Post Merged, Aug 30, 2016 ---
    What actually makes this funny is that it's more true now than ever. As many have said, it's "baked into the cake" not much is going to change at this point.

    Very sad to see America put thru this. It's as if someone fundamentally changed America.
     
  16. Herdfan thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    #16
    What I see as Hillary's main problem is that she has given so many different answers to these questions, which one will she give this time under oath? Can she remember all the different answers she has given to people. She fumbled around with a single question about sending and receiving classified info and gave at least 3 different answers to that one.

    I see these questions as ones that would get asked during a trial, not discovery. In other words, they already know the answer to these questions and are looking to catch her giving different ones.

    Remember Bill fessed up about Monica under oath: will Hillary come clean now?
     
  17. Robisan macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    #17
    Easy: "I don't recall."

    Or

    "F-U, you have all the communications. Find them yourself." Honestly, this BS question is just asking her to do their legal work for them.
     
  18. 1458279 Suspended

    1458279

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Location:
    California
    #18
    I don't know exactly how they got Bill, but it's not so easy. I caught someone with these once and he simply told the judge he didn't give the answer, his lawyer did and then changed his answer. Nothing came of it. It'll still be interesting.

    There's quite a bit more to come, Trey is talking about how she lied to them under oath, so this has plenty left to go.
     
  19. duffman9000 macrumors 68000

    duffman9000

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2003
    Location:
    Costa Mesa
    #19
    Where was this group after we went to war in Iraq and the WMDs were not found?
     
  20. Robisan macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    #20
    Jerking off to war porn and dead Muslims...
     
  21. duffman9000 macrumors 68000

    duffman9000

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2003
    Location:
    Costa Mesa
    #21
    I thought they were getting off to the pictures coming out of Abu Ghraib? Why else publish naked pictures of prisoners in exotic poses?
     

Share This Page