Just discussing some potential drone strikes on my personal email server

What we know publicly thus far:

• Hillary Clinton illegally possessed TS/SCI and the even higher classified subset TS/SAP outside secure SCIFs/SAPFs, and ordered that her private server be transferred onto another unprotected non-USG server, by private business with no top secret clearance. Hillary Clinton signed ironclad NDAs with the USG, promising, under threat of prosecution, to PROTECT and SAFEGUARD classified material – marked or unmarked – and was given indoctrinations in identifying and properly handling unmarked classified material. For the espionage-level mishandling of classified information crimes alone, 18 U.S.C. § 793 (f), Hillary Clinton will be indicted.
• Hillary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act, through the illegal destruction of work-related emails (federal records owned by the USG), in her self-directed 30,000+ “personal” emails purge, 18 U.S.C. § 2071 (b), disqualifies Hillary Clinton from holding public office including POTUS.
• Hillary Clinton sent multiple emails with classified identities of CIA agents, violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, 50 U.S.C. § 3121, an extremely serious felony, with mandatory consecutive sentence(s).
• FBI has declared that it regards everything found on Hillary’s server as prosecutable and/or potentially prosecutable evidence; FBI has gained access to emails Hillary attempted to destroy.
• The White House Press Secretary has given official confirmation that FBI is conducting a criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton, it is not some fictitious ‘security review.’

 

The Banks are corrupt, they help elect politicians that are corrupt, who hire law enforcement that is corrupt.

Goldman-Sachs will not allow Hillary to be indicted.

 

The gift that just keeps on giving.

 

Clearly this is odd and a large oversight. However, the other option is electing a bigot (Trump) who is incompetent across a number of domains, and incompetent enough to run his business interests in a fashion whereby they have been bankrupt many times. The greatest levels of incompetency lay with Trump.

 

Let's be fair. Neither one of them are really prize chickens.

 

Sounds from the lede to be the fault of the diplomats in Pakistan...

 

Yes. The past 8 years are pathetic. Part of me laughs a little that not only can so many support this but also that they can live it for 8+ years with Obama and still feel good about putting him at the helm. Anyone struggling who voted for him got what they deserve and those voting for Clinton will continue to receive the same. Thank you sir, may I have another....

--- Post Merged, Jun 12, 2016 ---

^^ kinda puts the dumb statements that Trump makes via twitter into perspective. I LOL that anyone could support Hitlery and defend her as being innocent. The only thing I will give her credit for is being so good at being so deceptive. Even Trump is a little envious inside I'm sure.

 

They elected Bush.

http://www.pensitoreview.com/2015/0...t-height-of-u-s-attorney-scandal-media-yawns/

Has Clinton deleted more than 22 million or did things so much worse that her issue can be deemed illegal all while Bush's actions were legal? Where was the GOP back then? Or did they delete 22 million emails trading ice cream and brownie recipes and know they're all okay?

He did nothing wrong. Media ignored while others said there was no wrongdoing and there likely was none. Lots of other officials (Rice, Powell, etc) had personal servers too. Whatever equivalent existed prior to email's first existence as well...

Her situation isn't exactly different. She did nothing wrong.

But they are not "Democrats". She is. We "get it". We understand. More partisan pattycake.

 

Trump would be the greatest if he wasn't a racist, a bigot, a sexist and a pathological liar. He does have good attributes, but these other attributes make him entirely unfit to serve as a national leader for four years.
Hillary is establishment.
Bernie should come through next month as the only viable option. I'm glad he hasn't bowed out of principle.

 

No, but you can do it by being a conniving scam artist.

Wait...Would you rather someone run confidential on AOL or gmail?

In those situations, a company and its employees have direct access to all of your communications. At least with a server, you have to be personally hacked for someone to gain access. And there's nothing saying that a server at home can't be just as secure as a business server.

 

There is a "CON" in convincing.