Just discussing some potential drone strikes on my personal email server

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Zombie Acorn, Jun 11, 2016.

  1. Zombie Acorn macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #1
  2. Jess13, Jun 11, 2016
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2016

    Jess13 Suspended

    Jess13

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    #2
    What we know publicly thus far:

    • Hillary Clinton illegally possessed TS/SCI and the even higher classified subset TS/SAP outside secure SCIFs/SAPFs, and ordered that her private server be transferred onto another unprotected non-USG server, by private business with no top secret clearance. Hillary Clinton signed ironclad NDAs with the USG, promising, under threat of prosecution, to PROTECT and SAFEGUARD classified material – marked or unmarked – and was given indoctrinations in identifying and properly handling unmarked classified material. For the espionage-level mishandling of classified information crimes alone, 18 U.S.C. § 793 (f), Hillary Clinton will be indicted.
    • Hillary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act, through the illegal destruction of work-related emails (federal records owned by the USG), in her self-directed 30,000+ “personal” emails purge, 18 U.S.C. § 2071 (b), disqualifies Hillary Clinton from holding public office including POTUS.
    • Hillary Clinton sent multiple emails with classified identities of CIA agents, violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, 50 U.S.C. § 3121, an extremely serious felony, with mandatory consecutive sentence(s).
    • FBI has declared that it regards everything found on Hillary’s server as prosecutable and/or potentially prosecutable evidence; FBI has gained access to emails Hillary attempted to destroy.
    • The White House Press Secretary has given official confirmation that FBI is conducting a criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton, it is not some fictitious ‘security review.’
     
  3. DearthnVader macrumors 6502a

    DearthnVader

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Location:
    Red Springs, NC
    #3
    The Banks are corrupt, they help elect politicians that are corrupt, who hire law enforcement that is corrupt.

    Goldman-Sachs will not allow Hillary to be indicted.
     
  4. Snoopy4 macrumors 6502a

    Snoopy4

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2014
  5. smacrumon macrumors 68030

    smacrumon

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    #5
    Clearly this is odd and a large oversight. However, the other option is electing a bigot (Trump) who is incompetent across a number of domains, and incompetent enough to run his business interests in a fashion whereby they have been bankrupt many times. The greatest levels of incompetency lay with Trump.
     
  6. Renzatic Suspended

    Renzatic

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Location:
    Gramps, what the hell am I paying you for?
    #6
    Let's be fair. Neither one of them are really prize chickens.
     
  7. Zombie Acorn thread starter macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #7
    Taking a Corp through bankruptcy doesn't necessarily make Trump incompetent. Buying assets that are insolvent for cheap and seeing them through bankruptcy could even be a strategy to make money, although risky.

    I think Trump has had some hits and misses in business, but at the end of the day he is a billionaire. That's a thousand millions at the very least. You don't get that rich being incompetent.

    Would Trump be my first choice? No. Having Hillary in the seat though? I'll take Bernie over her socialism and all.
     
  8. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #8
  9. pdqgp macrumors 68020

    pdqgp

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    #9
    Yes. The past 8 years are pathetic. Part of me laughs a little that not only can so many support this but also that they can live it for 8+ years with Obama and still feel good about putting him at the helm. Anyone struggling who voted for him got what they deserve and those voting for Clinton will continue to receive the same. Thank you sir, may I have another....
    --- Post Merged, Jun 12, 2016 ---

    ^^ kinda puts the dumb statements that Trump makes via twitter into perspective. I LOL that anyone could support Hitlery and defend her as being innocent. The only thing I will give her credit for is being so good at being so deceptive. Even Trump is a little envious inside I'm sure.
     
  10. thermodynamic Suspended

    thermodynamic

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #10

    They elected Bush.

    http://www.pensitoreview.com/2015/0...t-height-of-u-s-attorney-scandal-media-yawns/

    Has Clinton deleted more than 22 million or did things so much worse that her issue can be deemed illegal all while Bush's actions were legal? Where was the GOP back then? Or did they delete 22 million emails trading ice cream and brownie recipes and know they're all okay?

    He did nothing wrong. Media ignored while others said there was no wrongdoing and there likely was none. Lots of other officials (Rice, Powell, etc) had personal servers too. Whatever equivalent existed prior to email's first existence as well...

    Her situation isn't exactly different. She did nothing wrong.

    But they are not "Democrats". She is. We "get it". We understand. More partisan pattycake.
     
  11. Zombie Acorn thread starter macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #11
    Source that Rice, Powell had "personal servers" as indicated. Please keep in mind that using an email service and keeping your own personal email server are two different things. Especially when the data is under subpoena and you decide to delete a good portion of it. Google would simply retrieve that information and hand it to the government.

    Also if Bush broke the law, prosecute him as well. "He did it too" doesn't work in any other aspect of life, not sure why a potential POTUS would expect to get away with it. Own up to it.
     
  12. smacrumon macrumors 68030

    smacrumon

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    #12
    Trump would be the greatest if he wasn't a racist, a bigot, a sexist and a pathological liar. He does have good attributes, but these other attributes make him entirely unfit to serve as a national leader for four years.
    Hillary is establishment.
    Bernie should come through next month as the only viable option. I'm glad he hasn't bowed out of principle.
     
  13. samiwas macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    #13
    No, but you can do it by being a conniving scam artist.

    Wait...Would you rather someone run confidential on AOL or gmail?

    In those situations, a company and its employees have direct access to all of your communications. At least with a server, you have to be personally hacked for someone to gain access. And there's nothing saying that a server at home can't be just as secure as a business server.
     
  14. DearthnVader macrumors 6502a

    DearthnVader

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Location:
    Red Springs, NC
    #14
    There is a "CON" in convincing.
     
  15. Zombie Acorn thread starter macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #15
    Actually I would rather they use gmail, Google is pretty good at securing their servers, Hillary apparently isn't since a low level hacker was able to penetrate their systems.
     

Share This Page