Does anyone here have any experience using the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 or the Tamron 60mm f/2 1:1 macro? I am considering both lenses to round out my range, currently consisting of a 17-55mm f/2.8 paired with a 70-200mm f/4L. My needs include an ultrawide for landscape, but I would like it to be fast for live music photography. I am thinking of going with the Tokina over the Canon 10-22mm because of its constant, fast aperture. I am willing to give up 1mm for a fast, constant aperture. I also want a macro lens, but am considering the Tamron 60mm over the canon 100mm f/2.8 macro for the following reasons: -60mm would make it more suitable for portraits than the 100mm -f/2 is a full stop faster than f/2.8, again, for concert photography My mind is pretty much made up (If you cant tell ), but I figured I would ask for some feedback from you guys. any bad/good experiences with either one? Any quality control issues I should be aware of for those lenses? Any other recommendations? I am trying to pick up both new lenses for around $1000 combined. Thanks guys.