Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Meta today unveiled its first smart glasses sold under its own brand rather than Ray-Ban or Oakley, undercutting its existing lineup on price as it works to expand its lead in the category before Apple enters the market.

meta-adventurer-smart-glasses.jpg

The new Adventurer and Fury models are priced at $299, $80 less than the second-generation Ray-Ban Meta Wayfarer that launched last year. A third model, the Starfire, was designed in collaboration with Kylie Jenner and costs $399.

EssilorLuxottica, the parent company of Ray-Ban and Oakley, is manufacturing the glasses despite Meta designing them in-house and putting its own name on them, with EssilorLuxottica's logo appearing on the temple arms and packaging alongside Meta's.

The Adventurer has a rectangular Wayfarer-like shape available in standard and large sizes, while the Fury shares that silhouette but is thicker. The Starfire takes a slimmer oval shape and includes a small gemstone on the right lens near the camera, a metal nose pad designed to resist makeup residue, and the option to set an AI-generated version of Jenner's voice for the assistant and onboarding prompts. The Starfire's case includes a handwritten note from Jenner and a built-in mirror.

Across all three styles, Meta added a three-way adjustable nose pad, adjustable temple tips, and overextension hinges so the arms flare out slightly for wider head shapes. The companies are offering 26 color and lens combinations between the Adventurer and Fury alone, including tortoise, black, and green finishes, plus transition, polarized, and clear lens options, and the glasses support prescription lenses with a power range of -12 to +2.25.

The new glasses carry over the same 12-megapixel camera, 3K video capture, five-microphone array, and eight-hour battery life as the existing Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2 glasses, with the included case adding about 40 hours of additional charge. Meta is also offering a separate Meta Glasses Charging Stand compatible with the new models as well as the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta HSTN lines.

The glasses ship with Meta's Muse Spark AI model, which the company says improves response quality and adds 14 new languages to live translation support, including Mandarin, Korean, Japanese, Arabic, and Hindi, bringing the total to 20. A new "Dynamic Photo" feature captures a burst of images and selects the best shot, and pedestrian turn-by-turn navigation is coming to the camera-equipped lineup after debuting on Meta's display glasses.

According to Bloomberg, Meta also hinted that it's considering a version of its glasses without a camera, focusing on an audio-only experience for phone calls, media playback and interacting with its AI tools. A camera-free option could both lower the price point and enable new styles, it said, given the need to include fewer components.

The company also addressed Apple directly, calling the iPhone maker "formidable" in the space ahead of its own glasses debut. "I think you need to take anything they do seriously," Meta's Alex Himel said, adding, "they're good at hardware, they're good at design. There's a number of places where we won't necessarily be able to build the same quality consumer experience when paired with the phone, and so I think they're taking advantage of that."

Apple is widely expected to release its first smart glasses in 2027, designed in-house rather than through a partner brand. Apple's glasses will likely rely on a camera, microphones, and Siri for AI-driven features without an integrated display, putting them in direct competition with Meta's camera-equipped lineup rather than higher-end display models like Meta's Ray-Ban Display glasses.

Meta said it explored facial recognition tools for identifying people the wearer knows but has not put the feature into active development while it works through privacy and societal concerns.

The Adventurer, Fury, and Starfire glasses are available starting today through Meta and EssilorLuxottica retail partners including LensCrafters.

Article Link: Meta Launches Its Own $299 Smart Glasses Ahead of Apple's Debut
 
  • Angry
  • Haha
Reactions: Z-4195 and SFjohn
Are these not pointless without an eco-system around it

You want maps for live directions, then you will surely want Google or Apple Maps

Messages, having only whatsapp doesn't cover every one

AI assistant - Meta AI, hardly anyones first choice

App store - again Google or Apple are the only sensible options here
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn and attila


Meta today unveiled its first smart glasses sold under its own brand rather than Ray-Ban or Oakley, undercutting its existing lineup on price as it works to expand its lead in the category before Apple enters the market.

meta-adventurer-smart-glasses.jpg

The new Adventurer and Fury models are priced at $299, $80 less than the second-generation Ray-Ban Meta Wayfarer that launched last year. A third model, the Starfire, was designed in collaboration with Kylie Jenner and costs $399.

EssilorLuxottica, the parent company of Ray-Ban and Oakley, is manufacturing the glasses despite Meta designing them in-house and putting its own name on them, with EssilorLuxottica's logo appearing on the temple arms and packaging alongside Meta's.

The Adventurer has a rectangular Wayfarer-like shape available in standard and large sizes, while the Fury shares that silhouette but is thicker. The Starfire takes a slimmer oval shape and includes a small gemstone on the right lens near the camera, a metal nose pad designed to resist makeup residue, and the option to set an AI-generated version of Jenner's voice for the assistant and onboarding prompts. The Starfire's case includes a handwritten note from Jenner and a built-in mirror.

Across all three styles, Meta added a three-way adjustable nose pad, adjustable temple tips, and overextension hinges so the arms flare out slightly for wider head shapes. The companies are offering 26 color and lens combinations between the Adventurer and Fury alone, including tortoise, black, and green finishes, plus transition, polarized, and clear lens options, and the glasses support prescription lenses with a power range of -12 to +2.25.

The new glasses carry over the same 12-megapixel camera, 3K video capture, five-microphone array, and eight-hour battery life as the existing Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2 glasses, with the included case adding about 40 hours of additional charge. Meta is also offering a separate Meta Glasses Charging Stand compatible with the new models as well as the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta HSTN lines.

The glasses ship with Meta's Muse Spark AI model, which the company says improves response quality and adds 14 new languages to live translation support, including Mandarin, Korean, Japanese, Arabic, and Hindi, bringing the total to 20. A new "Dynamic Photo" feature captures a burst of images and selects the best shot, and pedestrian turn-by-turn navigation is coming to the camera-equipped lineup after debuting on Meta's display glasses.

According to Bloomberg, Meta also hinted that it's considering a version of its glasses without a camera, focusing on an audio-only experience for phone calls, media playback and interacting with its AI tools. A camera-free option could both lower the price point and enable new styles, it said, given the need to include fewer components.

The company also addressed Apple directly, calling the iPhone maker "formidable" in the space ahead of its own glasses debut. "I think you need to take anything they do seriously," Meta's Alex Himel said, adding, "they're good at hardware, they're good at design. There's a number of places where we won't necessarily be able to build the same quality consumer experience when paired with the phone, and so I think they're taking advantage of that."

Apple is widely expected to release its first smart glasses in 2027, designed in-house rather than through a partner brand. Apple's glasses will likely rely on a camera, microphones, and Siri for AI-driven features without an integrated display, putting them in direct competition with Meta's camera-equipped lineup rather than higher-end display models like Meta's Ray-Ban Display glasses.

Meta said it explored facial recognition tools for identifying people the wearer knows but has not put the feature into active development while it works through privacy and societal concerns.

The Adventurer, Fury, and Starfire glasses are available starting today through Meta and EssilorLuxottica retail partners including LensCrafters.

Article Link: Meta Launches Its Own $299 Smart Glasses Ahead of Apple's Debut
I still have no interest in a product like this, tech is already way too invasive . I don’t want it strapped to my face all day like wall e .
 
I know this is the future of tech but I'm not sure Meta is the company i want looking at and listening to everything I'm doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rensuchan
Probably the right move here to take the Rayban/Oakley branding off, along with the associated additional cost. No one was looking at the branded versions and thinking they were designer glasses, people just looked at them and saw chonky tech goggles. I still struggle to understand the purpose of this product since it doesn't have a display. It's basically just a GoPro in the form of sunglasses, but who is looking for that? GoPro is heading out of business because it's super niche, there's only so many mega-athletes doing BASE jumping who care about something like this.

What can the normal person do with this that's useful? I can't get a photo with a friend, because it only looks outward. I can't see an email or anything because there's no screen. I can talk to Meta AI? Which customer on this planet ever asked for or wants that? It can play audio that almost certainly sounds much worse than AirPods Pro and will be hearable by others standing nearby. These early glasses are the definition of solutions desperately searching for a problem to solve.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn and attila
Much better price. Don't think privacy is something that can be expected with these glasses. Waiting for Apple to release similar AR/VR glasses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
I looked up Meta Adventurer on Amazon and they are currently sold by/shipping from Amazon for $9,999! This is clearly a mistake but wow.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: CDPlayer
I still don't know why, beyond specialized uses, anyone would want smart glasses from any company. They make basic things less intuitive and less easy, as has/does AR for most things - really: why is this even a thing? Google already tried and failed quite spectacularly with this, and their form factor wasn't the reason.
 
I still don't know why, beyond specialized uses, anyone would want smart glasses from any company. They make basic things less intuitive and less easy, as has/does AR for most things - really: why is this even a thing? Google already tried and failed quite spectacularly with this, and their form factor wasn't the reason.
Another tool for data collection and mapping, and consumers will gladly pay for it just as they have with smart home devices that have collected data for years. It’s all about money and data and it’ll be fed right into AI data centers.
 
Another tool for data collection and mapping, and consumers will gladly pay for it just as they have with smart home devices that have collected data for years. It’s all about money and data and it’ll be fed right into AI data centers.
Yup. Pretty disappointed with all of it. It isn't as though Vision Pro flew off the shelves, either, largely because it is useless. Apple: start listening to the people that actually use your products again, please. No one outside of Cupertino is excited about this.
 
I realize we don't have very much privacy anymore, but having a bunch of people around me wearing these things, not knowing whether or not they are recording me at any given time is unbelievably creepy. I turned around at dinner one night in a nice restaurant to find a guy recording my friends and I, and then panning around the rest of the restaurant. I'm far from famous. Who does this, really? Creepy weirdos, that's who.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.