Just thought i'd bring this up as i'd love to hear reactions. Apple have just released their new MP3 player. the iPod Nano. with a miniscule footprint, shorter battery life than the mini and a worse cost/gb ration than the mini. only thing is people are raving over this new device. (on a personal note i was really loving it until i realised £130 wasn't for the 4gb version and it's replaced the Mini range) however you have to form an orderly queue to flame the Micro. Whereas, if you think about, they are both exactly the same, they just do different jobs. the Micro costs more than an SP (well, in the US), its smaller, its pretty, its clearly aimed at the fashionable market. the Nano costs more than the Mini, holds less, its small and pretty and aimed at the fashionable market. Views? should it all boil down to Shigsy having a better RDF?