Military Exercise: Exposing an official 9/11 lie by Condi Rice and others in the Bush administration

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Jess13, Jun 2, 2016.

  1. Jess13 Suspended

    Jess13

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    #1
    Condoleezza Rice, lying to the 9/11 Commission

    http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-03-30-questions-usat_x.htm

    "I don't think that anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon, that they would try to use an airplane as a missile," she said. Some 9/11 family members have called that disingenuous and suggested that the administration either didn't take the threats seriously or that Rice and others were trying to protect themselves by saying no one could have imagined such attacks.
    Falcon Indian


    FI.jpg
    Note: Both flights that hit the WTC towers, allegedly had five terrorists!

    Proximity of UN HQ to the WTC

    UNHQWTC.jpg
    Found via

    http://911raptor.blogspot.com/2016/05/raptor-or-guardian.html
     
  2. Robisan macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    #2
    George W. Bush didn't become president until 9/12/2001. You can look it up.
     
  3. obeygiant macrumors 68040

    obeygiant

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Location:
    totally cool
  4. Jess13 thread starter Suspended

    Jess13

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    #4
    Is NSA still illegally spying on 100,000,000+ Americans daily because 9/11 happened? Are there thousands of dead American soldiers, tens of thousands more injured and thousands with limbs blown off, and millions of foreign citizens dead and/or lives destroyed because 9/11 happened? Is there still a so-called war on terror in progress because 9/11 happened? I could list numerous other similar points. 9/11 is still relevant.
     
  5. obeygiant macrumors 68040

    obeygiant

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Location:
    totally cool
    #5
    I never said 9/11 wasn't relevant. But why this headline now? Rice's "lie" doesn't effect the outcome of 9/11 at all.
     
  6. Jess13 thread starter Suspended

    Jess13

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    #6
    Because I just found this and it is yet another of the endless 9/11 lies by the Bush administration.
     
  7. Meister Suspended

    Meister

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    #7
    The 9/11 narrative has been the trigger and justification for the errosion of rights and wars for 1 1/2 decades now.

    It is riddled with lies and inconsistencies.
     
  8. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #8
    The idea that the 9/11 were an act that was unexpected or unthinkable is an outright lie, but you do not need to go into government records to know that:

    [​IMG]

    Clancy published a book in 1994 in which a terrorist crashed a plane into the Capital. Clancy even discusses that a plane with more fuel makes a bigger bomb. No doubt Clancy got the idea from background discussions he had with his contacts in the US intelligence and military community. Indeed, anybody with any knowledge of WWII would have been aware of the use of manned planes as guided bombs (e.g., kamikaze attacks).

    And yet, on 9/11 our fighters were misdirected over the Atlantic and some were even sent up unarmed under the presumption they would ram the planes to prevent them from crashing into cities. I think one of the reasons the Dubya used the military so much after 9/11 was to cover up his gross negligence as commander in chief on the day. I believe he was the worst President in US history, and I fail to understand how the GOP can try to claim they are the party of national defence given Dubya's multiple fatal blunders.
     

Share This Page