In LizKat’s recent Jeb thread, I have brought up that the Bush Crime Family is running scared, primarily relating to the 28 Pages (that Obama continues to suppress): http://forums.macrumors.com/threads...p-rivals-because.1960431/page-2#post-22656047 Well I just found this, relating to the 28 Pages Saudis being treasonously protected: Missing Clinton Email Claims [28 Pages] Saudis Financed Benghazi Attacks https://medium.com/@williamreynolds...saudis-financed-benghazi-attacks-b471a61b5b2b March 7, 2016 [...] In either of these scenarios, Clinton and her close associates are in violation of federal law. In the most generous interpretation where this e-mail is simply a collection of rumors that Blumenthal heard and forwarded unsolicited to Clinton, it would make no sense for it to be missing. It would not be classified if it was a bunch of hot air, and it certainly wouldn’t be deleted by both Blumenthal and Clinton at the risk of committing a felony. In the least generous interpretation of these facts, Sidney Blumenthal and Hillary Clinton conspired to cover up an ally of the United States funding the assassination of one of our diplomats in Libya. Why A Grand Jury Is Likely Already Convened After the final e-mails were released by the State Department on February 29th, it has been reported in the last week that: ▹ Clinton’s IT staff member who managed the e-mail server, Bryan Pagliano, has been given immunity by a federal judge which suggests that he will be giving testimony to a grand jury about evidence that relates to this investigation and implicates himself in a crime. Until now, Pagliano has been pleading the fifth and refusing to cooperate with the investigation. ▹ THE HACKER GUCCIFER (MARCEL LAZAR LEHEL) JUST HAD AN 18-MONTH TEMPORARY EXTRADITION ORDER TO THE UNITED STATES GRANTED BY A ROMANIAN COURT, DESPITE BEING INDICTED BY THE US BACK IN 2014. IS GUCCIFER BEING EXTRADITED NOW IN ORDER TO TESTIFY TO THE GRAND JURY THAT THE SCREENGRAB WITH THE MISSING E-MAIL IS REAL? (Note: ^ WOW) ▹ Attorney General Loretta Lynch was interviewed by Bret Baier and she would not answer whether or not a grand jury has been convened in this case. If there was no grand jury she could have said so, but if a grand jury is meeting to discuss evidence she would not legally be allowed to comment on it.