Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MP 1,1-5,1 MacPro5,1: BootROM thread | 144.0.0.0.0

Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
B

bookemdano

macrumors 68000
Jul 29, 2011
1,512
843
tsialex said:
I don't think that we know enough about what is causing this to make a hypothesis. Anyone dumped the problematic 140.0.0.0.0?
Click to expand...

I dumped it prior to the 144.0.0.0.0 upgrade. I can send it to you on Tuesday when I am back at work.
 
fatespawn

fatespawn

macrumors regular
Feb 22, 2009
237
110
Chicagoish
bookemdano said:
I still think it has something to do with jumping directly from 140.0.0.0.0 to 144.0.0.0.0. Seems that almost everyone having this problem (including myself) skipped the 141.0.0.0.0 bootrom that was released with 10.14.4.

You will have to suck it up and install onto a SATA drive if you want to install 144.0.0.0.0
Click to expand...

I have the Kryo m.2 PCIe adapter running a 970Pro NVME drive. I went directly from 140 to 144 without a problem.
 
B

bookemdano

macrumors 68000
Jul 29, 2011
1,512
843
H

hasseye

macrumors newbie
May 25, 2019
5
0
bookemdano said:
Yeah, sounds like it's not a straightforward cause. Is yours an authentic 5,1 or was it a 4,1 flashed to 5,1?

Anyway, let's try to consolidate this discussion to the dedicated thread for it so people don't have to hunt around for data points and info: https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...0-0-0-0-to-144-0-0-0-0-does-not-work.2182219/
Click to expand...

Just wanted to thank everyone. I used a SATA drive and all worked out well the first time on both computer's. I am using a 4,1 to 5,1 so maybe that does have something to do with it?
 
Pressure

Pressure

macrumors 603
May 30, 2006
5,045
1,384
Denmark
bookemdano said:
I still think it has something to do with jumping directly from 140.0.0.0.0 to 144.0.0.0.0. Seems that almost everyone having this problem (including myself) skipped the 141.0.0.0.0 bootrom that was released with 10.14.4.

You will have to suck it up and install onto a SATA drive if you want to install 144.0.0.0.0
Click to expand...
I had no issues going from 140 to 144. I downloaded the full installer from the AppStore and upgraded the firmware that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crjackson2134
tsialex

tsialex

Contributor
Original poster
Jun 13, 2016
12,955
13,198
MarkC426 said:
Apologies alex, but what do you mean by 10.15 blocking mp5.1, have I missed some news?
Click to expand...

10.15 won't support MP5,1 anymore, support starts with MP6,1

Screen Shot 2019-06-03 at 16.49.20.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: trifero, Mac_User 0101 and orph
H

hasseye

macrumors newbie
May 25, 2019
5
0
I'm a little surprised ours don't support it. I guess I can see why Apple wouldn't want to officially support us given they finally have a new Mac Pro out, but as long as we have metal cards, I'm not sure what is stopping us from installing it. 2012 Macbookpros etc and 2012 iMacs are all compatible, what does there's have that we don't?

I wouldn't be surprised if "unofficially" we're able to install it. Although we won't get anymore firmware upgrades, but I appreciate Apple for still upgrading our firmware so far.
 
B

bsbeamer

macrumors 601
Sep 19, 2012
4,307
2,703
hasseye said:
I'm a little surprised ours don't support it. I guess I can see why Apple wouldn't want to officially support us given they finally have a new Mac Pro out, but as long as we have metal cards, I'm not sure what is stopping us from installing it. 2012 Macbookpros etc and 2012 iMacs are all compatible, what does there's have that we don't?

I wouldn't be surprised if "unofficially" we're able to install it. Although we won't get anymore firmware upgrades, but I appreciate Apple for still upgrading our firmware so far.
Click to expand...

BLAME INTEL. The lack of microcode updates for all MP5,1 issued CPUs for the recent vulnerabilities are likely the main reason 10.15 will officially be unsupported.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reindeer_Games and Manzanito
H

hasseye

macrumors newbie
May 25, 2019
5
0
bsbeamer said:
BLAME INTEL. The lack of microcode updates for all MP5,1 issued CPUs for the recent vulnerabilities are likely the main reason 10.15 will officially be unsupported.
Click to expand...
Great great point. Why would Apple want to support something that has security vulnerabilities. Apple would then need to spend time trying to patch Intel's problems. For them, there's no reason to do so.

For us Mac Pro 5,1 fans, hold out hope. I believe we'll be able to install it unofficially, as everything I've read and saw if it supports Mojave it supports Catalina.
 
tsialex

tsialex

Contributor
Original poster
Jun 13, 2016
12,955
13,198
hasseye said:
Great great point. Why would Apple want to support something that has security vulnerabilities. Apple would then need to spend time trying to patch Intel's problems. For them, there's no reason to do so.

For us Mac Pro 5,1 fans, hold out hope. I believe we'll be able to install it unofficially, as everything I've read and saw if it supports Mojave it supports Catalina.
Click to expand...
MP5,1: Catalina Developer Preview works, more or less…
 
  • Like
Reactions: trifero, Synchro3 and octoviaa
tsialex

tsialex

Contributor
Original poster
Jun 13, 2016
12,955
13,198
10.14.6 DP2 released, downloading it now. Build is 18G48f.

Screen Shot 2019-06-11 at 14.02.58.png
[doublepost=1560273955][/doublepost]10.14.6 DP2 EFI Version table for non BridgeOS Macs:

(All Macs that have Mojave support had firmware upgrades, except MP5,1)

Some Macs BootROM versions are now two versions over, btw.
Mac:EFI version:
IM13,1286.0.0.0.0
IM14,1138.0.0.0.0
IM14,2138.0.0.0.0
IM14,3138.0.0.0.0
IM14,4198.0.0.0.0
IM15,1229.0.0.0.0
IM16,1228.0.0.0.0
IM16,2228.0.0.0.0
IM17,1168.0.0.0.0
IM18,1173.0.0.0.0
IM18,3173.0.0.0.0
IM19,1220.270.076.0.0
MB10,1176.0.0.0.0
MB8,1182.0.0.0.0
MB9,1182.0.0.0.0
MBA5,1258.0.0.0.0
MBA6,1116.0.0.0.0
MBA7,1187.0.0.0.0
MBP10,1256.0.0.0.0
MBP10,2279.0.0.0.0
MBP11,1155.0.0.0.0
MBP11,2155.0.0.0.0
MBP11,4193.0.0.0.0
MBP12,1185.0.0.0.0
MBP13,1234.0.0.0.0
MBP13,2257.0.0.0.0
MBP13,3257.0.0.0.0
MBP14,1196.0.0.0.0
MBP14,2196.0.0.0.0
MBP14,3196.0.0.0.0
MBP9,1227.0.0.0.0
MM6,1279.0.0.0.0
MM7,1243.0.0.0.0
MP5,1144.0.0.0.0
MP6,1131.0.0.0.0

Code: 
$IBIOSI$ MP61.88Z.F000.B00.1905251553
Copyright (c) 2005-2019 Apple Inc.  All rights reserved.
Apple ROM Version
  Model:        MP61
  EFI Version:  131.0.0.0.0
  Built by:     root@saumon
  Date:         Sat May 25 15:53:29 PDT 2019
  Revision:     131 (B&I)
  ROM Version:  F000_B00
  Build Type:   Official Build, Release
  Compiler:     Apple clang version 3.0 (tags/Apple/clang-211.10.1) (based on LLVM 3.0svn)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Reindeer_Games, bsbeamer, orph and 2 others
trifero

trifero

macrumors 68030
May 21, 2009
2,728
2,574
tsialex

tsialex

Contributor
Original poster
Jun 13, 2016
12,955
13,198
Second useless* info of the day:

If you have a bricked backplane, restored MP51.fd to it and then you run BlankBoardSerializer, the only thing added is the SSN, all other hardwareIDs will be blank.

Screen Shot 2019-06-14 at 08.31.54.png

Screen Shot 2019-06-14 at 08.32.19.png


blank.0.jpg
blank.1.jpg
blank.2.jpg
blank.3.jpg
blank.4.jpg
blank.5.jpg
blank.6.jpg
blank.7.jpg


*Btw, it's not useless info per se, but it's an useless application of BBS. You still need to do a reconstruction of your hardwareIDs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: h9826790, angelsevov and bsbeamer
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom