New era of SSD has arrived!! Crucial M500 vs new Samsung Evo!

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by Bobby Corwen, Aug 15, 2013.

  1. Bobby Corwen macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    #1
    Crucial M500 on Amazon:
    http://www.amazon.com/Crucial-2-5-Inch-adapter-Internal-CT960M500SSD1/dp/B00BQ8RGL6
    960 GB for 599$

    vs

    Samsung Evo on Amazon:
    http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-Elect...F8&qid=1376635899&sr=1-5&keywords=samsung+ssd
    1TB for 650$


    Well forget Optibay. These bad boys are here just in time for the Retina MBP era!

    Samsung is sold out, but does anyone have the low-down? Is Evo equivalent or better than the pro line? Or is pro still better? Where does it fall in the order of speeds?

    Samsung is clearly the better choice overall, agreed?
     
  2. johnnnw macrumors 65816

    johnnnw

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2013
    #2
    Here "just in time for the Retina era", but don't fit in Retinas :)
     
  3. Zeov macrumors 6502a

    Zeov

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Location:
    Odense
    #3
    they are very impressive indeed. But 1 TB SSD is A LOT.

    imagine having two 1 TB SSD's in a Unibody MacBook... o_O

    i currently have 768GB SSD in my Retina, but if i had the option to go with 256SSD + 512GB HDD, i would have done that.. but sadly it's all flash.. i hate storing movies and music on SSD :p
     
  4. ViennaXP macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2012
  5. aixporter macrumors member

    aixporter

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2009
    #5
    No... OP is mislead. Retina Macs do not have user serviceable parts - meaning you can't plug these in.
     
  6. saturnotaku macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    #6
    You can't plug in the specific parts mentioned in the OP but the Retina's SSDs can be replaced by the end user.
     
  7. ViennaXP macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2012
    #7
    We need more SSD Sellers for the Retina Macbook. As far as I know OWC is the only company ,which sales SSDs for the Retina.
    Their prices are pretty high
     
  8. dusk007 macrumors 68040

    dusk007

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2009
    #8
    Evo is the replacement for the old 840. The Pro persists and is still one tier up.
    It is basically a 840 with newer Nand (128Gbit chips). It isn't really any faster or slower at the same capacity. Higher cap is usually better for write performance though (and endurance).
    I really doubt that anybody can possible notice any kind of performance difference between any of these modern SSDs. They are all so so close in performance.
     
  9. cube macrumors G5

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
  10. B... macrumors 68000

    B...

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
  11. Bobby Corwen thread starter macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    #11
    Wait wut?


    NOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooo!!!!

    All my storage space plans down the toilet...

    I guess I just have to buy the drive and memory I want directly from Apple...

    Damn, I specifically need a min of a Terabyte for all my stuff...
     
  12. cube macrumors G5

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    #12
    A bigger 2.5" SSD plan would be 2TB at around $5000.
     
  13. Stetrain macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    #13
    You can't put a standard 2.5" drive in a rMBP, but Apple generally uses custom versions of the latest SSDs in their machines.

    I wouldn't be surprised to find that the special blade SSDs in the Haswell rMBPs are based on the 840 Evo and Crucial M500. The fact that 1TB SSDs are becoming common also bodes well for a 1TB option in the new models.
     
  14. Bobby Corwen thread starter macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    #14
    Well I would be getting a Haswell rMBP...
     
  15. Gedankenlos macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2013
    #15
    Can you explain why you hate storing movies and music on SSD please :p
     
  16. Zeov macrumors 6502a

    Zeov

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Location:
    Odense
    #16
    feels like a waste of SSD because watching a movie or listening to a song doesn't require anything near 500 Mb/s.. SSD's are still too expensive for mass storage (for the average user)
     
  17. xxcysxx macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2011
    #17
    all that capacity and its still stuck on sata 3, the new macbook pro is using pci express interface. that's much faster than sata 3.

    beside the capacity, the speed is also what ranks up the quality of the drive.
     
  18. Pheo macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    #18
    About time Apple sorted their flash pricing then!
     
  19. scbond macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2010
    Location:
    Nottingham, UK
    #19
    Hardly a new era...the M500 has been out for some time now (like several months before the first post).
     
  20. yjchua95 macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2011
    Location:
    GVA, KUL, MEL (current), ZQN
    #20
    They're based on the Samsung XP941s
     

Share This Page