Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

obeygiant

macrumors 601
Original poster
Jan 14, 2002
4,254
4,240
totally cool
An optical effect first proposed by Isaac Newton has been observed in matter for the first time. The discovery is yet another affirmation of wave–particle duality – one of the cornerstones of quantum mechanics. The breakthrough is also the first published science to emerge from a £200m neutron source recently opened in the UK.

Newton predicted in the 17th century that a beam of light reflected at a glass-vacuum surface should undergo a minuscule lateral shift. He was arguing that wavefronts, having reached the vacuum, should "slide" a short distance along the interface before re-emerging and reflecting back into the glass.

The distinction between waves and particles is not as clear-cut as common sense might suggest. Due to the quantized nature of energy, light can sometimes behave as if it were composed of particles, and particles can behave as if they were waves.
physicsworld.com

The whole dual nature of light as waves and particles has always fascinated me. I believe you can observe light acting as waves if you hold your hand up to a light and look between your fingers, fingers close enough but not touching, you'll see parallel lines which are wave nodes.
 
I believe you can observe light acting as waves if you hold your hand up to a light and look between your fingers, fingers close enough but not touching, you'll see parallel lines which are wave nodes.

Nice find, OP. The stuff about holding your finger / thumb close together, I don't think the optical effect is due to wave/particle duality.

You'd need a far finer slit than that. There's many fascinating optical edge effects sure, but I think they're due to other reasons.
 
Nice find, OP. The stuff about holding your finger / thumb close together, I don't think the optical effect is due to wave/particle duality.

You'd need a far finer slit than that. There's many fascinating optical edge effects sure, but I think they're due to other reasons.

I was looking around I found a NASA article on it:

When an electromagnetic wave passes by an obstacle in space, the wave is bent around the object. This phenomenon is known as diffraction. The effects of diffraction are usually very small, so we seldom notice it.
However, you can easily see the effect of diffraction for yourself. All you need is a source of light, such as a fluorescent or incandescent light bulb. Hold two fingers about 10 cm in front of one eye and make the space between your fingers very small, about 1 mm. Now look through the space between your fingers at the light source. With a little adjustment of the spacing, you will see a series of dark and light lines. These are caused by constructive and destructive interference of light diffracting around your fingers.

The reason diffraction occurs is not exactly obvious. Christian Huygens in the mid-1600s offered an explanation that, strange though it may seem, still nicely explains the observations.

You may recall the inverse-square law of electromagnetic propagation from basic physics. As electromagnetic radiation leaves its source, it spreads out, traveling in straight lines, as if it were covering the surface of an ever expanding sphere. This area increases proportionally to the square of the distance the radiation has traveled.

Electromagnetic energy may be considered to propagate from a point source in plane waves. The inverse square law applies not only to the source of the energy but also to any point on a plane wave. That is, from any point on the plane wave, the energy is propagated as if the point were the source of the energy. Thus, waves may be considered to be continuously created from every point on the plane and propagated in every direction.
NASA

I just thought that if the light was acting as particles it wouldn't do that.
 
Well explained sir. Now I'm looking between my fingers and thumb and trying to work out which of the optical effects I'm seeing are the ones you mean.

While reading up on the double slit experiment, I also found that the interference fringes are seen even if you fire one single electron at a time, recording its location of landing on a photographic slide. The location of the next landing can't be predicted, even given previous landings, yet even with a time gap between firings, a coherent image is built up. That wasn't in the books when I was studying physics ...

200px-Double-slit_experiment_results_Tanamura_2.jpg


Even more oddly, it's been done with large molecules and just recently with a 1mm droplet of oil. Somehow they managed to make it interfere with itself while passing through a two slits apparatus.

http://www.physorg.com/news78650511.html

I won't pretend to understand that. Just have to remember that we are not actually dealing with 'waves' and 'particles' here - they're just interpretions or rationalisations of extremely, extremely strange things.
 
WhatEhat you guys are talking about is pretty much correct. To make it even more interesting, take a strand of hair and somehow straighten it out while it's in the air. This is easy to do with your fingers, but don't use them. If possible, ask someone else to hold it.

Next, take a red laser pointer and shine it at the hair. Do it in a dark room, and against a white wall so that the red laser has somehing clear to hit.

Using the power of Google, do a search for an experiment of this type. There should be much better instructions for his experiment there, but he point is that by measuring the space between points in the pattern, and relating this spacing with those of other small things/particles of known size, you can actually figure out how thick your hair is. :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.