Obama pledges $8 billion for nuclear power plant

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by MacNut, Feb 16, 2010.

  1. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #1
    http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-obama-nuclear17-2010feb17,0,356519.story
     
  2. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #2
    It's sad we haven't had a plant built here since the 80's. Doesn't france get like 60% or higher of its energy from nuclear power?
     
  3. flopticalcube macrumors G4

    flopticalcube

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    In the velcro closure of America's Hat
    #3
    Better late than never. I think $8b is too little, however.
     
  4. MacNut thread starter macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #4
    This is just one plant. I'm sure he wants to build more.
     
  5. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #5
    According to the BBS this is just another $8b secured in addition to funds that haven't been spent yet. The actual total is around $51B.
     
  6. flopticalcube macrumors G4

    flopticalcube

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    In the velcro closure of America's Hat
    #6
    So 8-10 plants. Not a bad start. By the time they are built they will probably cost about twice the amount. I'm not even sure there are enough nuclear engineers around to allow for the concurrent construction of more than a few plants at a time. What's the average age in the industry, something like 50-55?
     
  7. MacNut thread starter macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
  8. flopticalcube macrumors G4

    flopticalcube

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    In the velcro closure of America's Hat
    #8
    Sorry, I was thinking of the average age of the personnel, not the plant. We are going to have to get the schools moving to staff all these new plants.
     
  9. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #9
    Bah, only 13 active applications from utilities for reactors right now. And still 2 years away from a the NRC granting the first permit.

    While they have dropped in the last year from 18 permit applications due to "financial" difficulties.

    Couple few may get built with loan guarantees, but with the current short term 90day/1 quarter mentality in the financial circles these days ... handling a $10 billion chunk of change on a 20-30 year horizon might make people nervous these days.
     
  10. MikhailT macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    #10
    About time, too. Nuclear reactors are more advanced and safer now, even tho there's no foolproof methods to prevent another disaster, it's practically on same failure rate as airplanes. I do foresee micro fusion reactors built under cities in future.
     
  11. Ttownbeast macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    #11
    I think more standards should be set as far as personnel go:
    [​IMG]
     
  12. lord patton macrumors 65816

    lord patton

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Location:
    Chicago
    #12
    To the extent this is a productive step toward building more nuclear plants in the U.S. This is good.

    I'm sceptical, though. The regulatory and legal hurdles make the financial side of the equation look easy.

    Obama has always included nuclear power in his plans and rhetoric, but I haven't been convinced he's willing to mount the full-court press it will take to even break ground on a single new plant.

    Nice start. Good luck. We'll see how it goes.
     
  13. GfPQqmcRKUvP macrumors 68040

    GfPQqmcRKUvP

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Location:
    Terminus

Share This Page