Obama's Nuclear Summit: Media Not Welcome

IntheNet

macrumors regular
Original poster
Oct 6, 2009
190
0
Surprising frankness from the Post's Dana Milbank on Obama's assault against the First Amendment this week; finally the media starting to report on this!

Obama's disregard for media reaches new heights at nuclear summit
By Dana Milbank
The Washington Post
Wednesday, April 14, 2010;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/13/AR2010041303067_pf.html
World leaders arriving in Washington for President Obama's Nuclear Security Summit must have felt for a moment that they had instead been transported to Soviet-era Moscow. They entered a capital that had become a military encampment, with camo-wearing military police in Humvees and enough Army vehicles to make it look like a May Day parade on New York Avenue, where a bicyclist was killed Monday by a National Guard truck. In the middle of it all was Obama -- occupant of an office once informally known as "leader of the free world" -- putting on a clinic for some of the world's greatest dictators in how to circumvent a free press. The only part of the summit, other than a post-meeting news conference, that was visible to the public was Obama's eight-minute opening statement, which ended with the words: "I'm going to ask that we take a few moments to allow the press to exit before our first session."
 

yg17

macrumors G5
Aug 1, 2004
14,888
2,480
St. Louis, MO
Perhaps they were discussing classified intelligence about Iran and North Korea's nuclear programs that, if we let the entire world hear, might endanger us? There was an opening statement and a news conference for the media :rolleyes: Do you actually think about the right wing talking points you post before posting them?
 

NT1440

macrumors G5
May 18, 2008
12,141
13,987
Wow, you really don't think there would be classified information exchanged at a NUCLEAR SUMMIT?

Seriously man, you're making yourself look more and more foolish by the post.
 

niuniu

macrumors 68020
Well imagine wanting privacy, confidentiality and everyone to focus on the issue at hand instead of wasting energy on how to play the press game.

I mean, it's only a matter of billions of lives at the end of the day. These summits have a habit of not being overly productive. I'll be glad the day the media get pushed aside and world leaders actually get some work done.

But I'm sure a lot of people will be disappointed there's no stupid 'Yo, Blair' type nonsense they can create a fanfare over. Stuff 'em.
 

IntheNet

macrumors regular
Original poster
Oct 6, 2009
190
0
Do you actually think about the right wing talking points you post before posting them?
Dana Milbank from The Washington Post is hardly the right wing... Also the media free zone contrasts strikingly with that "most open and transparent administration" foolishness we heard earlier...
 

NT1440

macrumors G5
May 18, 2008
12,141
13,987
Dana Milbank from The Washington Post is hardly the right wing... Also the media free zone contrasts strikingly with that "most open and transparent administration" foolishness we heard earlier...
So you think any and all government actions are supposed to be open to the world now? Where is your outrage that our commanders in war zones aren't tweeting the plans to their missions online? :rolleyes:

Seriously man, critical thinking, not cherrypicking will get you further in life.
 

GfPQqmcRKUvP

macrumors 68040
Sep 29, 2005
3,211
373
Terminus
So because Obama promised more transparency that means he should release all the details of his meetings and accompanying top secret documents?

If he had allowed press at the summit, ITN, you'd be quick to add how Obama is hastening the demise of the United States by being so unconcerned with secrecy and the classified information the government holds.
 

IntheNet

macrumors regular
Original poster
Oct 6, 2009
190
0
So because Obama promised more transparency that means he should release all the details of his meetings and accompanying top secret documents?
Whose secrets is he keeping Badandy? Ours or theirs?

Obama Seeks Sweeping Declassification Of Top Secret Documents
By Shannon Bell
Wednesday, December 30th, 2009
http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=5253
Who needs classified top secret information anyway? Evidently not President Barack Obama; in an effort to in his words “reform the security classification and declassification system”, Obama signed an executive order seeking sweeping declassification of top secret documents. This is apparently the one area that Obama wants to be open and transparent. Obama set a four year deadline for declassifying documents going all the way back to the World War II era, as well as Vietnam and Korean wars. In the process of implementing this executive order, Obama cancelled an order given by George W. Bush that allowed the leader of the intelligence community to veto the declassification of documents so ordered by an interagency panel. In the future agencies who object to certain information being declassified have to now appeal to the President himself. Because of course, who knows more about intelligence information, an intelligence official or Barack Obama?
 

GfPQqmcRKUvP

macrumors 68040
Sep 29, 2005
3,211
373
Terminus
Let me get this straight:

You are faulting Obama for both declassifying secret information and also for keeping meetings where secret information is being discussed closed to the media...in the same thread.

OK, gotcha.
 

rdowns

macrumors Penryn
Jul 11, 2003
27,345
12,409
Let me get this straight:

You are faulting Obama for both declassifying secret information and also for keeping meetings where secret information is being discussed closed to the media...in the same thread.

OK, gotcha.

I LOL'd, a lot.
 

yg17

macrumors G5
Aug 1, 2004
14,888
2,480
St. Louis, MO
It might be "their" secret information they're keeping confidential, but did you ever stop to think that if Iran knows that we know all about their nuclear program, they might take more measures to hide what they're doing and end any further gathering of intelligence we're doing? :rolleyes:
 

GfPQqmcRKUvP

macrumors 68040
Sep 29, 2005
3,211
373
Terminus
Ours...



Theirs...
You don't think any of our intelligence is being discussed at this nuclear summit?

But this point requires thought above and beyond your Obama advocacy...
Didn't vote for the guy and wouldn't vote for him if given another chance to. It's alright though, I understand you're still a little peeved that you're the RINO and not me. There's a term for you, and it's neocon. You believe in restricting personal liberty and instituting theocracy. Real republicans, however, are socially liberal and fiscally conservative. You've got neither of those right.
 

IntheNet

macrumors regular
Original poster
Oct 6, 2009
190
0
You don't think any of our intelligence is being discussed at this nuclear summit?
Both of our major allies - Israel or UK - declined to attend. Proliferation of nukes in North Korea and Iran are the primary strategic issues here (neither of which Obama has yet addressed) and this nuke summit requires classified intelligence on our behalf? Are you completely missing the entire strategic agenda?

You believe in restricting personal liberty and instituting theocracy.
Liberal media complain about restricting information access, I post thread on it, and you accuse me of instituting theocracy... OK, gotcha.
 

jb1280

macrumors 6502a
Jan 13, 2009
813
25
ITN, can you give me one good reason why a document from 1956 concerning American policy directed towards a communist regime that no longer exists should still remain classified?

I also see no reason why Dana Milbanks needs access to the Nuclear summit to write some sort of fluff piece.

I am also certain that you would be calling the President a traitor for divulging state secrets should the media have been given access.
 

Full of Win

macrumors 68030
Nov 22, 2007
2,615
1
Ask Apple
Something has to be up, because the man loves coverage about himself.

I suspect he wanted to discuss how to disarm the US of all nuclear weapons.
 

GfPQqmcRKUvP

macrumors 68040
Sep 29, 2005
3,211
373
Terminus
And all other countries! Sincerely, how amazing would that be.

It's a bit out of reach for now, but maybe in time, with successive leaders with a similar resolve to Obama, maybe it can happen.
Doubtful. There will be groups/nations somewhere in the world who will seek to have power that other nations willingly gave up.
 

Full of Win

macrumors 68030
Nov 22, 2007
2,615
1
Ask Apple
Yup he did. He wants a world without nukes, what a terrible idea! :rolleyes:

I take it you didn't like Reagan's stance on nukes either?
If you think that a nuclear weapon free world is a good thing, then I just don't know what to say. Having the ability to destroy an attacking country at a moments notice, is an ability that we cannot give up.