Oh for the Love of God

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by joepunk, Nov 14, 2008.

  1. joepunk macrumors 68030

    joepunk

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Location:
    a profane existence
    #1
    And for christ's sake.

    Here's the online letter.
     
  2. iShater macrumors 604

    iShater

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Location:
    Chicagoland
  3. gilkisson macrumors 65816

    gilkisson

    #4
    This letter was written to "non-practicing" Catholics, telling them they have to repent before coming back to church, because they voted for Barak. These are folks who aren't following the church anyways, so therefore already need to "repent".

    As if the church would tell a few million folks to take a hike, if they decided to come back and pay their tithes...

    If you disagree with with this, you should read up on Bob Jones "University", also in South Carolina. Spooky, 24/7/365.
     
  4. yg17 macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #5
    This church should lose its tax exempt status.
     
  5. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #6
    All churches should lose their tax exempt status.
     
  6. BigHungry04 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Location:
    Connecticut
    #7
    Pope Benedict said that anyone who believes in a woman's right to choose, and is a Catholic should consider themselves excommunicated from the Roman Catholic Church. There's nothing better than having a Pope tell me I'm going to Hell no matter what I do! The good thing is, all of my friends will be with me.
     
  7. Blue Velvet Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    #8
    That's about 80% of Italians then. Nice try, Joseph Ratzinger.
     
  8. Don't panic macrumors 603

    Don't panic

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Location:
    having a drink at Milliways
    #9
    ratzinger is one of the worst thing ever to happen to the catholic church.

    do you have a source for that statement. i don't doubt it, i'd just like to read in context. thx
     
  9. BigHungry04 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Location:
    Connecticut
    #10
    Here it is. I saw this on msnbc.com a few years ago but couldn't find the link, but Reuters still has it up:

    http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL0956318820070509
     
  10. atszyman macrumors 68020

    atszyman

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Location:
    The Dallas 'burbs
    #11
    And there's one of the biggest problems that I have. It's fine for Catholics to be against abortion and any other religion for that matter. But other religions, including Catholics at one point, used to believe that the soul enters the body with your first breath in which case until the baby is out of the womb, it has no soul.

    Admittedly many religions have refined their views on this, but to try and make abortion illegal based on only your particular religion's views is wrong. Why not try to pass a law saying that people can't eat meat on Friday's between Ash Wednesday and Easter?

    And why the hell can't someone be pro-choice and pro-life at the same time?

    I don't like abortion, I'd never push for anyone I knew to have one, but I also realize that I shouldn't be able to force a woman through the physical and mental hardships of a pregnancy because of my personal views. I also realize that making abortion illegal will result in many illegal abortions that will not only risk the baby's health and life but they will also put the woman's health and life severely at risk (a view once vocalized by John McCain).

    To me the answer lies in good comprehensive sex education and easy access to various redundant forms of birth control to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies. If we eliminate unwanted pregnancies abortions will only be used in cases where the health of the mother is severely at risk.

    But as is typical with the bailouts and everything else, we try to stop the result, rarely do we ever try to address the root cause of the problem.
     
  11. leekohler macrumors G5

    leekohler

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Location:
    Chicago, Illinois
    #12
    Let them keep making stupid statements. Let them. It just drives more supporters out of the church.
     
  12. Surely Guest

    Surely

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #13
    Agreed. What a scam.
     
  13. 66217 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    #14
    Abortion has always been condemned by the Church. And it has been a cause of ex-communion since I have memory.

    The ex-communion comes when you participate in an abortion or promote abortion. I wouldn't say voting for Obama is ex-communion, nor is it a sin. Tho, I think you'll find more Catholics voting for a conservative president than a liberal president.

    Wouldn't this be to contradict yourself? I mean, how can you support one thing and be against it at the same time.
     
  14. atszyman macrumors 68020

    atszyman

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Location:
    The Dallas 'burbs
    #15
    I can personally be against abortion but realize that my limitation in forcing my views onto other people is not something that should be pursued by the government and instead the underlying cause of unwanted pregnancy should be addressed in a realistic way. Instead of making the avenue of last resort illegal, lets educate and make available the means to prevent the cause.
     
  15. DeaconGraves macrumors 65816

    DeaconGraves

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2007
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    #16
    One can be morally opposed to abortion, yet still have no problem with others making the decision for themselves, and for that decision to be legal.
     
  16. 66217 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    #17
    We had a different perception of what pro-life and pro-choice is then. I take pro-life as to be against abortion, and pro-choice as to be in favor of abortion.

    As for what you said I think it depends how you see abortion. If you see it as killing someone, then you obviously won't be irrelevant if someone else decides to practice an abortion. Not that I'll go and stop the person with force, but I'll still disapprove of what she/he is doing.
     
  17. EricNau Moderator emeritus

    EricNau

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    #18
    No, pro-choice is to be in favor of allowing women the freedom to make their own decisions.

    You can certainly believe in a woman's right to choose while personally disagreeing with her choice.
     
  18. Prof. macrumors 601

    Prof.

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago
    #19
    THIS JUST IN: The same priest was just found behind the pews with a little boy.



    Sorry:eek:
     
  19. atszyman macrumors 68020

    atszyman

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Location:
    The Dallas 'burbs
    #20
    And that's a huge problem with the whole debate.

    The views aren't mutually exclusive and our goals as a society are the same. I just see outlawing abortion as leading to even more lives lost as desperate women seek dangerous and illegal procedures. Nobody likes getting an abortion (and if they do there are other issues that probably need addressing) and none of us who recognize that we cannot make decisions for other people when it comes to their bodies, are not out encouraging pregnant women to have abortions.

    It seems more realistic in my opinion, to address the issue of unwanted pregnancy which should have more of an impact on eliminating abortion than outlawing the procedure.
     
  20. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #21
    Lol one of his first acts as pope was blessing ferraries or lambos,did you guys really expect him not to be a lunatic?:p
     
  21. FrankieTDouglas macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    #22
    Then your perception isn't correct due to not understanding the meaning of words. Pro-life and pro-death would be two contrasting terms. "Life" and "death." But "life" and "choice" are not contrasting terms. "Choice" is an inclusive term which in this context, contains "life" and "death," the core contrasts. So yes, someone can be pro-life AND pro-choice. Pro-life is their personal choice... but still, part of a CHOICE, hence the belief in being able to choose such a perspective due to being pro-choice.
     
  22. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #23
    Amen brother! Sing it!

    You might think that, but thinking it doesn't make it true:
    [​IMG]
    54%-45% in favor of Obama.
     
  23. 66217 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    #24
    Yet the United States is only a little percentage (I think around 6%) of the whole Catholic population.

    It is difficult finding statistics for the rest of the world, but I could say, without fear of being wrong, that in Latin American countries most Catholics vote for conservative presidents.
     
  24. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #25
    Oh, worldwide... I have no idea. But then again, what's considered conservative in most of the rest of the world is still considered center-left in America, so that comparison may be impossible to draw any conclusions from.
     

Share This Page