So, Nancy Pelosi releases a statement, criticizing Trump for the summit. She writes: https://www.democraticleader.gov/newsroom/61218/ Now I'm going to quote a few things here... "Apparently, the President handed Kim Jong-un concessions in exchange for vague promises that do not approach a clear and comprehensive pathway to denuclearization and non-proliferation." What does she mean by concessions? Does she mean the suspension of joint military exercises between the US and South Korea? If that's true my question is if you're going into negotiations with a hostile nation in good faith and you know the North Koreans find these exercises provocative, wouldn't the suspension of such exercises be healthy for further negotiations, so that they don't break down? "In his haste to reach an agreement, President Trump elevated North Korea to the level of the United States while preserving the regime’s status quo." This is simply untrue. The document signed by both parties clearly indicate they will continue to work together for peace and the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula, that is not the current status quo : Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. "The United States and the DPRK commit to hold follow-on negotiations, led by the U.S. Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, and a relevant high-level DPRK official, at the earliest possible date, to implement the outcomes of the U.S.–DPRK summit." Honestly, my question is why is she playing partisan politics, or have I misses something? Perhaps someone here who has Government experience can opine? The document clearly states they are in the initial stage of negotiations, yet the political left see's this as the only, or final document, end all, be all? "scratches head". 1. Was it expected that Mr. Trump was supposed to have KJU sign a comprehensive denuclearization peace treaty on the very first day he met with KJU? Has that ever happened before? 2. If this is all wrong what would have been the proper way for Trump to handle this?