Photobucket Just Broke Billions of Photos Across the Web

Discussion in 'Community Discussion' started by Huntn, Jul 31, 2017.

Tags:
  1. Huntn, Jul 31, 2017
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2017

    Huntn macrumors Pentium

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #1
    Maybe I need to start looking for another free photo hosting service. Maybe if the backlash is enough, they will have second thoughts about this. I've looked at the Photobucket site and see no links to customer support. Maybe you have to pay them to get that?

    Photobucket Just Broke Billions of Photos Across the Web

    Since 2003, the popular photo hosting service Photobucket has been letting users upload and host images for free on their servers. They have over 10 billion images stored by 100 million registered users. But now they’re going to start charging, and that means billions of images around the Web are now broken.

    Hotlinking (AKA inline linking) is when someone takes an image file hosted on a server and embeds it on a different webpage elsewhere. Since the new webpage continuously requests the file from the original source server, it saps the server owner’s bandwidth (and storage space).

    Photobucket allowed hotlinking photos uploaded to and stored on its servers for a long time. This was their business model, and they made money from ads on their own site, which users would be exposed to when they went to upload content.

    Unfortunately for Photobucket users, things are about to change in a big way as of June 26th. Now the service is rolling out a $399 per year subscription fee for those who want to hotlink images from Photobucket’s servers to display elsewhere. That means that billions of images across the Web now display an error message instead of the image in question.
     
  2. velocityg4 macrumors 68040

    velocityg4

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2004
    Location:
    Georgia
    #2
    Free to $399 per year. Sounds like someone is about to go out of business.
     
  3. ThisBougieLife macrumors 68000

    ThisBougieLife

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2016
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, California
    #3
    Pretty crappy move. I only rarely used Photobucket to upload some of my own photography and I don't know that I ever linked to it. But I have been seeing that error message everywhere lately.
     
  4. BarracksSi Suspended

    BarracksSi

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2015
    #4
    Back when they changed their ToS to say that they could use anybody's uploaded photos for other reasons (probably just inserting them into PR materials for Photobucket, but still...), it was weird enough.

    Now, $400/year? Nah. I'm out.

    I just need to decide whether it's worth it to try downloading all of them and deleting my account. I tried one method last week (this all started about three weeks ago, I think) and the page refused to work. Maybe it was a Safari issue, so I'll try Chrome later.
     
  5. ApfelKuchen macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2012
    Location:
    Between the coasts
    #5
    TANSTAAFL (there ain't no such thing as a free lunch)!

    The "free" web requires someone to pay the bills. The notion that there are enough advertising dollars to fund every feature and website has been unrealistic from the start.

    I agree that the advertised price would be ridiculously expensive for a non-business user. I'd expect the folks at Photobucket are sufficiently aware of their user base (and how those users utilize the service) to know whether they have a chance of collecting the fees from a significant portion of that user base.
     
  6. D.T. macrumors 604

    D.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Location:
    Vilano Beach, FL
    #6
    Yeah, for the last 2 weeks or so, a car site I frequent had tons of broken photos due to this. Most folks just hopped onto another service when they found out the new business model.

    Flickr is still pretty nice, still free, allows direct links, etc., and recently since I've been using Google Photos for a 3rd backup (and sharing across non-iOS devices), I've just been using that service for remote image hosting.
     
  7. DrewDaHilp1 macrumors 6502a

    DrewDaHilp1

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    All Your Memes Are Belong to US
  8. Zenithal macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    #8
    The problem with Photobucket was there was always a paid tier. People stopped using Photobucket because it became harder and harder to use. Not to mention their site had become a script laden mess, causing even the most performance orientated computers to lock up their browser. Imageshack tried something like this a long time ago and they've gone the way of the Dodo, too.
    --- Post Merged, Jul 31, 2017 ---
    They've become the defacto image host. Similar services like theirs have popped up and gone. They manage to get very fat ad contracts with major companies. I have no idea what makes them special, but it works.
     
  9. Huntn thread starter macrumors Pentium

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #9
    You can always keep them there and download to link to another site, but some forum sites have very strict upload limits like 8 images. This is why a hot link is what I mostly need.

    Anyone know of a possible alternate free photo hosting service?

    Edit: I just saw posts 6& 7. :)
     
  10. Zenithal macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    #10
    Sign up for an Imgur account. You can control your images from there.
     
  11. Jakalex macrumors newbie

    Jakalex

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2017
    Location:
    PA
    #11
    I was wondering why my photobucket photos weren't showing on a for sale add on a different forum.
    $399 a year sure is a quick way to go out of business.
     
  12. Michaelgtrusa macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    #12
    Server storage cost money and they need to keep the lights on.
     
  13. JackieInCo macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Location:
    Colorado
    #13
    They won't do that at $399/year.
     
  14. MacGizmo macrumors 65816

    MacGizmo

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2003
    Location:
    Arizona
    #14
    imgr is about the only large-scale alternative right now, though there are other smaller ones. The best option of course is to just get your own domain/hosting.
     
  15. Jessica Lares macrumors G3

    Jessica Lares

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2009
    Location:
    Near Dallas, Texas, USA
    #15
  16. TheScavenger macrumors 6502

    TheScavenger

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    #16
    IMGR seems to be the best alternative. Rest in peace Photobucket. :(
     
  17. Melrose Suspended

    Melrose

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
  18. mattDC5R, Aug 3, 2017
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2017

    mattDC5R macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Location:
    Perth, W.Aust now Austin, TX
    #18
    It sure is a horrific site to use, always despised the occasional time i need to use it over the past few years.

    Even the useful sounding "download album" yields nothing but waiting on even a small album of 5 images.
    The ads continue to load just great though!

    Cant imagine the incentive to pay them money to continue to use their crappy product! I guess they are going for the hold them to ransom method of business.
     
  19. ThisBougieLife macrumors 68000

    ThisBougieLife

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2016
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, California
    #19
    And what a spectacular example of how NOT to treat your users. I hope they lose business.
     
  20. mattDC5R macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Location:
    Perth, W.Aust now Austin, TX
    #20
    surprisingly not that slow to go through image by image and download, i had around 300-400 photos in there and its only taken 20-30 minutes to get them all. alas some were from an old computer that had hdd failure so wanted the copies.

    see ya photobucket! sure you were free so its hard to complain about free things but you sucked pretty bad!
     
  21. Huntn thread starter macrumors Pentium

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #21
    I'm considering alternates.
     
  22. Huntn, Aug 4, 2017
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2017

    Huntn thread starter macrumors Pentium

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #22
    I''ve got about 20 albums at Photobucket. I'm there now trying to download one of my smaller albums, and I keep getting an error message, a message: something did not click, try again. :mad: I'm trying to figure out if this is a server glitch or something else, Photobucket not cooperating or being overwhelmed with people downloading their photos from this service?

    For anyone who is using Imgur, the web site page seems to be minimalistic. Can you organize photos as ablums and have privacy viewing settings? Thanks!
     
  23. mattDC5R macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Location:
    Perth, W.Aust now Austin, TX
    #23
    I was getting that error message on a couple of albums, and not others. But no albums started a download irrespective of size.

    How many images in total do you have there? The individual image pages seem to run much better.
     
  24. Huntn thread starter macrumors Pentium

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #24
    The particular album I tried d to download had 40 images. In total I have 700 images. I'll try again tomorrow. :(:(
     
  25. mattDC5R macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2009
    Location:
    Perth, W.Aust now Austin, TX
    #25
    For 700 photos I'd save myself the aggravation of waiting for the album to maybe start downloading and just do it manually. Probably only take an hour.
    Then take some pleasure out of closing your account and telling them why!
     

Share This Page