Now reporting the news is off-limits with these people. These are probably the same people who say they aren't homophobic. Sad.Powerful photographs can have lasting impact, and a Post photo of two men kissing is an image that many readers can neither forget nor accept.
The photo, which ran on the newspaper's front page and online last week, captured Jeremy Ames and Taka Ariga kissing outside D.C. Superior Court on the day that the District began accepting license applications for same-sex marriages.
Almost immediately, I began hearing from upset readers. Thats normal when controversial photos appear in The Post. The same thing happened recently when The Post published disturbing images of Haiti earthquake victims. Typically, the complaints quickly subside. With last Thursdays photo, they continued into Friday, through the weekend and even today. Early this morning, before D.C. Superior Court began issuing licenses to same-sex couples who had applied, a caller phoned to warn that he would cancel his Post subscription if I see another photo of men lip-locking.
A few of the readers have engaged in rants, often with anti-gay slurs. One called me to complain about promoting a ****** lifestyle. Another complained about the photo in an e-mail to the two Post reporters who wrote Thursdays story about the licenses: That kind of stuff makes normal people want to throw up. People have kids who are being exposed to this crap. I will be glad when your rag goes out of business. Real men marry women.
But most simply said The Post had offended their sensibilities by publishing the photo, especially on the front page.
Ann Witty of Woodbridge wrote to say she had canceled the Post subscription she has held since the 1960s.
I am 65 years old and I realize that the world is changing rapidly much more rapidly than I would like it to, she e-mailed. While I realize that the Post must report on these changes even the ones with which I do not agree I feel that the picture on Thursday morning was an affront to the majority of your readership. It is not something that I want coming into my home. I believe that even your editors know that it would have been better placed in the Metro section and that it would have mitigated its impact to do so.
Wrote Lee Miller of Columbia: I would appreciate it if your cover pictures would not be so disturbing where my kids can see it easily on the kitchen table... please dont shove this Gay business in our face. This is something that should have shown up on an inside page or two (without the picture).
In comments to the ombudsmans call-in line (202.334.7582), one reader said, the picture of two guys kissing makes me cringe. Another called it ridiculous, adding: Put it on page 10 or page four, put it in the paper, but I do not like it right there where I cant avoid looking at it.
Many threatened to cancel their Post subscriptions, and more than two dozen did. Post circulation vice president Gregg Fernandes said that late last week 27 subscribers canceled, specifically citing the photo. In contrast, The Post reported only two cancellations immediately after last Julys ethics uproar over its ill-advised plan to sell sponsorships to off-the-record salon dinners at the publishers residence.
Did the Post go too far? Of course not. The photo deserved to be in newspaper and on its Web site, and it warranted front-page display.
News photos capture reality. And the prominent display reflects the historic significance of what was occurring. The recent D.C. Council decision to approve same-sex marriage was the culmination of a decades-long gay rights fight for equality. Same-sex marriage is now legal in the District. The photo of Ames and Ariga kissing simply showed joy that would be exhibited by any couple planning to wed especially a couple who previously had been denied the legal right to marry.
There was a time, after court-ordered integration, when readers complained about front-page photos of blacks mixing with whites. Today, photo images of same-sex couples capture the same reality of societal change.