Post your 2011 MacBook Pro GeekBench Score (STOCK)

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by ZZANG, Feb 28, 2011.

  1. ZZANG macrumors regular

    ZZANG

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Location:
    Planet Cybertron
  2. tasslehawf macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2003
    Location:
    Austin, TX
  3. Mactastic91 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    #3
    baseline 15, just got it 2 hours ago!!! 8,825. I'm about to install a ssd pretty soon
     
  4. Fazzl macrumors 6502a

    Fazzl

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    #4
  5. skiltrip macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    May 6, 2010
    Location:
    New York
    #5
  6. dacknass macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    #6
  7. aznguyen316 macrumors 68020

    aznguyen316

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    #7
    I assume everyone's doing the free 32bit one? Noticed m 13" i7 benched like 6900 or so on 32bit and 7498 or something on 64bit.
     
  8. auero macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
  9. kjos8035 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    #9
    Kids with 2.2's and 4 gigs of ram bout to get smoked.
    /thread
     
  10. ZZANG thread starter macrumors regular

    ZZANG

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Location:
    Planet Cybertron
    #10
    This is what I use for my dock customization. I'm a neat freak. :p
    http://www.leoparddocks.com/index.php


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    Attached Files:

  11. ZZANG thread starter macrumors regular

    ZZANG

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Location:
    Planet Cybertron
    #11
    This thread is for "stock" benchmarks to see where the general value stats stand at to give a more baseline estimate.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  12. ZZANG thread starter macrumors regular

    ZZANG

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Location:
    Planet Cybertron
    #12
    What I'm more interested in is why the scores are higher on the 17" vs 15" with same specs... That in itself is confusing to me.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  13. auero macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    #13
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

    The 17 runs cooler since it's bigger therefore allowing the processor to work harder for longer.
     
  14. Inara macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    #14
    The 15" was clocked 2.2 and scored 11000, the 17" was clocked 2.3 and achieved ~11300. The solution is simple :)
     
  15. ZZANG thread starter macrumors regular

    ZZANG

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Location:
    Planet Cybertron
    #15
    The Geekbench scores I've been seeing for stock 2.2 15" are around 9k-10k.... So I was definitely surprised when 11K kept coming up for the results of my MBP.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  16. bcaslis macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    #16
    This depends on which Geekbench program you run. The paid (64 bit) one gives better numbers than the free (32 bit) one.
     
  17. auero macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    #17
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

    It varies on if you have things open while testing. I have to test mine again with everything closed.
     
  18. jlyanks85 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    #18
    What's the difference between the 32 and 64 bit geekbench? Why do you have to pay to view the 64 bit geekbench results, and the 32 bit is free?

    Do you get a better score with 64 bit geekbench?
     
  19. auero macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    #19
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Yes
     
  20. bcaslis macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    #20
    One runs as a 32 bit app and another as a 64 bit app. You need to pay (I think it's about $20) to get a license code that will let the 64 bit app run.
     
  21. hoxley macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2011
    #21
    the things people will do for a higher number to post onto the internet.
    does geekbench have any other use?

    your mbp is still the same. :p
     
  22. Naimfan macrumors 68040

    Naimfan

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
  23. jetjaguar macrumors 68030

    jetjaguar

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Location:
    somewhere
  24. iPhone1 macrumors 65816

    iPhone1

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    #24
    This post disgusts me; only because my high end 2010 MBP with a GB score of 6600 now gets smoked by a 13" MBP.
     
  25. jetjaguar macrumors 68030

    jetjaguar

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Location:
    somewhere
    #25
    nevermind .. downloaded it

    32bit geekbench score - 10,410

    was hoping for better ... specs are in sig .. only thing slow on this is the 5400rpm hdd
     

Share This Page