PowerBook BenchMarks

Discussion in 'Macintosh Computers' started by chazmox, Sep 17, 2003.

  1. chazmox macrumors regular

    Feb 4, 2003
    Here's the benchmarks I ran on my new 1.25 GHz 15 inch PB :D


    Overall score was 105.4 and I ran Xbench several times and all scores were within +/- .5.

    The CPU scores compares as expected to a Quicksilver ( 800 MHz ), but the overall score is brought down in comparison.

    Lower score come from the harddrive performance ( expected ), the "thread" performance ( due to the large 2 MB cache in the Quicksilver ), and the OpenGL performance.

    If the thread performance is due to the cache then 512k L2 DOES NOT make up for 256k L2 and 2M L3. I'm still looking into how that compares to 1M L3.

    Not sure about the OpenGL test.

  2. chazmox thread starter macrumors regular

    Feb 4, 2003
  3. dennis88 macrumors member

    May 13, 2003
    I ordered the 5400rpm drive with my 1,25ghz pb, so I will get a higher score.
    I can't wait!
  4. chazmox thread starter macrumors regular

    Feb 4, 2003
    But I got mine... and you're still waiting on yours!!!!



    Ok, just let us know what your xbench score are...
  5. stoid macrumors 601


    Feb 17, 2002
    So long, and thanks for all the fish!
    Do the Xbench scores reflect the dual processor nature of the Quicksilver, or is it treated like a single 800Mhz processor machine?
  6. Macnasien macrumors newbie


    Sep 17, 2003
    Irvine, California
    Great Bench but bad system for compare

    The Quicksilver MP 800 is a bad System for comparision, because of its huge L3 Cache of 2MB and the system also have 1 GB Ram. :confused:
    There are other SP Systems with 933 or 1 Ghz which have the same amount of RAM and they where not much faster then the 1.25 GHz 15" PB. I think Apple does a great Job on this Hot Stuff ;) . I can't wait to get my fingers on one of this AlPBs, maybe my own. Still considering if i should switch from iBook to 15" AlPB with 1,25 GHz. GC rocks to, still can't believe it Radeon 9600. This whole thing rocks.
  7. cb911 macrumors 601


    Mar 12, 2002
    BrisVegas, Australia
    xBench is affected by what you have installed, and if you've opened any programs isn't it? did you do the test on a 'clean' install, not opening any apps beforehand?

    that seems like a good score regardless.
  8. chazmox thread starter macrumors regular

    Feb 4, 2003
    No apps were open during the xbench, but a few may have been opened and closed since startup - does that matter? I checked and there were 39 running processes at the time of the xbench.

    I don't remember chosing the Quicksilver, I thought the website chose it as a standard.

    Also, I ran MOH with everything set to it's highest level ( except the resolution which I set to the highest screen resolution the PB can display ). The game ran very smooth which is much more than I can say for my FP iMac.

    Anyone know how I can get fps from MOH???
  9. dennis88 macrumors member

    May 13, 2003
  10. dennis88 macrumors member

    May 13, 2003
    Chazmox, can you try unreal tournament 2003 and see how many fps it gets?

  11. chazmox thread starter macrumors regular

    Feb 4, 2003
    I'd love to, but I don't have that game...

    Maybe I could get it - how do you get fps off of the games. Is this a special function of UT2003?

Share This Page