'Premeditated Flash Dump' of Apple Shares Behind Friday's Last-Second Slump, Says Trader

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jan 28, 2013.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot


    Apr 12, 2001

    A blog entry at Zero Hedge suggests that a deliberate share dump in the final second of trading may have been partly responsible for yet another drop in Apple's share price on Friday.

    Zero Hedge cites several Nanex charts as evidence, observing that some 800,000 shares worth $350 million were traded in the final seconds of trading on Friday.
    The move brought Apple's stock price down by approximately $5 in the waning seconds of the week's trading, where it sat throughout much of the after-hours trading period leading into the reopening of regular trading this morning. Apple's stock is down another $3.50 as trading opens today.

    Article Link: 'Premeditated Flash Dump' of Apple Shares Behind Friday's Last-Second Slump, Says Trader
  2. ArtOfWarfare macrumors 604


    Nov 26, 2007
    I'm glad I don't own any stocks... it just sounds too risky...
  3. samcraig macrumors P6

    Jun 22, 2009
    ..or the transaction just came in late. Who can say for sure. Maybe the order was put in earlier but was delayed or held.

    I doubt there's any "conspiracy" here.
  4. JaySoul macrumors 68020


    Jan 30, 2008
  5. hovscorpion12 macrumors 65816


    Sep 12, 2011
    This move is called shorting the stock. get owners scared, sell. Once the price gets to a designated spot, start buying again. Its extremely risky, but making making money on loss, priceless. Apple's stock is going to continue to fall to cover the gap. Apple could go bellow 400.00 by February. Apple is in trouble if it doesn not fix it this year. Apple can easily retake the market with a revampt IOS 7, iPhone, iPad and a new "special product."
  6. fasterthanfiber macrumors newbie

    Jan 28, 2013

    I can't see them going up to anywhere near where they are - if owners sold means they are at a loss - why would they rebuy? I can imagine this will trigger a mass-sell.
  7. extricated macrumors 6502


    Jul 14, 2011
    I up-voted your comment - not because I liked it, but because you nailed it.
    Many people don't realize the type of "artificial" manipulation of the market that shareholders can weild.

    I heard again on the news today about how Apple stock tanked last week because they fell short of analyst's predicted earnings - albeit with another record-breaking quarter?
  8. CausticPuppy macrumors 65816

    May 1, 2012
  9. ck2875 macrumors 6502a


    Mar 25, 2009
    If they're just going to artificially manipulate the stock markets, shouldn't it be illegal for Analysts to have a stake in the companies they toy with? (I'm not just talking Apple here.)
  10. Moopy Sac macrumors member

    Moopy Sac

    May 29, 2003
    Shorts are considered sales for calculating volume?
  11. Rogifan macrumors P6


    Nov 14, 2011
    It's up almost 2% this morning. Is it normal for mega cap stocks like this to be so volatile?
  12. Dan-- macrumors regular

    Jul 30, 2008
    Ok, no one knows for sure where the price is headed, (especially not me) but as of right now, about 10:05 AM Monday, the stock is at 448.23 +8.35 (1.90%). It looks like they sold it around 443. So at this point, these folks are out a little over $4M.

    Risky indeed.
  13. hovscorpion12 macrumors 65816


    Sep 12, 2011
    When an investor goes long on an investment, it means that he or she has bought a stock believing its price will rise in the future. Conversely, when an investor goes short, he or she is anticipating a decrease in share price.

    Short selling is the selling of a stock that the seller doesn't own. More specifically, a short sale is the sale of a security that isn't owned by the seller, but that is promised to be delivered. That may sound confusing, but it's actually a simple concept.

    when you short sell a stock, your broker will lend it to you. The stock will come from the brokerage's own inventory, from another one of the firm's customers, or from another brokerage firm. The shares are sold and the proceeds are credited to your account. Sooner or later, you must "close" the short by buying back the same number of shares (called covering) and returning them to your broker. If the price drops, you can buy back the stock at the lower price and make a profit on the difference. If the price of the stock rises, you have to buy it back at the higher price, and you lose money.
  14. Anonymous Freak macrumors 601

    Anonymous Freak

    Dec 12, 2002
    Yup - how much of the loss was honest "fell short of analyst's predictions" reaction vs. how much was this flash dump? Most of the loss appeared in the last seconds of trading, which appears to be this flash dump. One would expect that any loss due to analyst statements would have occurred right after the earnings announcement.
  15. everything-i macrumors 6502a

    Jun 20, 2012
    London, UK
    Apple is a good buy at the moment based on the companies fundamentals. This dump was calculated to trigger a lot of automatic trading when peoples stop loss limits were hit. Big investors manipulating the market to pump some money out of the small investors. Nothing new, eventually it will settle down once all big investors think they have milked it enough.
  16. 184550 Guest

    May 8, 2008
    One of the more interesting articles I've read on MR lately. Hope there are more like this in the future now that another member of staff has been added.
  17. J1989, Jan 28, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013

    J1989 macrumors newbie

    Nov 15, 2012

    I imagine it is not illegal for large funds to conspire to short a stock, but I wonder if reinstatement of the uptick rule would slow it down. The same with High Frequency Trading.
  18. WhoDaKat macrumors 6502

    May 20, 2006
    Some people need to do some research on High Frequency Trading. This isn't some investor, this is a huge faceless corporation purposefully trying to tank Apple's stock. Just wait. I've got a $1 that says Google is behind this.
  19. moobatticus, Jan 28, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013

    moobatticus macrumors member


    Aug 30, 2012
    I always find it amazing how easy it seems to be able to manipulate stock or even economies by talking them down. "Not innovating", "running out of ideas" - and so called analysts overestimating, so that even with record profits and new products (iPad Mini for example), they still manage to shake investors.

    Still, can you imagine having bought APPL in 1996 and then selling in 2011?!
  20. kas23 macrumors 603


    Oct 28, 2007
    I'll buy some more Apple stock once it falls below $400. Shouldn't be too long now.
  21. iMikeT macrumors 68020

    Jul 8, 2006
    I saw this happen live on my AAPL chart last Friday and now I know the reason behind it. It didn't last for more than a couple of seconds where the price dropped ~$4.50/share then quickly climbed back.

    Yes people, these things are easily manipulated by the big guys to make lots of money off much smaller investors.


    You'll be waiting longer than you thought as AAPL is back above $450 at the moment.
  22. tatonka macrumors 6502


    Aug 25, 2009
    It sure is time that this high frequency trading is somewhat regulated on a global level. After the 2008 crash, the banks are back up on top gambling with our money again, while average people are still suffering from the crisis. This sort of stock trading has nothing to do with evaluating the value of a company or its chances to prevail, it is simply playing odds of quickly shifting very large amounts of money forth and back.
  23. johncrab macrumors 6502


    Aug 11, 2011
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Apple is just Wall Street's latest cash cow. Here is how it works:

    Big institutional investors get together in back rooms and choose companies they know are really solid and have profit in their future. They set irrationally high quarterly numbers or claim a company "did not exceed expectations by enough". They start a plunge by selling short a large block of shares to create panic. Then other companies and individuals panic (predictably) and dump their shares thinking the sky is falling. The share price plunges.

    When the damage has been done and a share price has been devalued 20-30%, the big investors start buying back those shares. Momentum builds and drives the price back where it was and they make billions as the price rises, more than offsetting the short sell they used to start this march of the lemmings.

    I watched Wall St do this to GE at 8 month intervals in the late 80's, working a 10 point drop then rise. GE killed this with repurchase programs but the same thing has happened to HP and Microsoft and other companies. It is extremely predictable once it starts but only the fat cats make the real money, basically by defrauding smaller investors by making them panic.
  24. iMikeT macrumors 68020

    Jul 8, 2006

    The only way to prevent the manipulation is with strong regulations. Of course that will never happen as politicians are in the back pockets of these Wall Street fat cats.
  25. SnowLeopard2008 macrumors 604


    Jul 4, 2008
    Silicon Valley
    It's pretty obvious that Apple stock is severely undervalued right now and the main reason why it's so low is because of some Wall Street manipulation. Nothing new. This is what Wall Street does for a living.

Share This Page