This is just dripping with irony. http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/illinois/article_d2bcf1f2-885b-5b26-8bab-4d75319e8314.html The defense said exactly what I was thinking when I was reading the article - what religious text doesn't incite violence? If anything, the Satanic Bible is better in that regard - it only encourages violence in an eye for an eye type scenario. It doesn't condone killing someone because they believe in something different from you, or because they're gay, working on the sabbath, wearing mixed fabrics or eating pork. If they're going to ban the Satanic Bible because it incites violence, then surely they need to ban the Bible and Koran too, they're about as violent as they come. I really hope this guy appeals his case and wins. Thoughts?