Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by mactastic, Dec 11, 2007.
More of that well-regulated militia, right?
Indeed. And just as much proof of my assertion as 'Rat's thread is proof of his.
the evidence is overwhelming for both of you
What was the point of this thread again?
To spite another forum member or to highlight gun violence?
Someone gets the point of the thread...
If only everyone on the scene had been armed...
What? That these three "yoots" had no regard for property or human life, got caught and now will be punished for their crimes? I'm sure this type of senseless violence never existed before the invention of guns too.
I'll put you in the catagory of "those who missed the point of the thread".
why don't you spell it out for us, mac. If you need a category for those who missed it, you're thread is in dire need of clarification.
Why do you say that? Only two people have been unable (or unwilling) to grasp the point.
Try harder, it's really not that difficult.
So, that's roughly 10,600 murders committed with a gun, vs. how many criminals gunned down by security guards or those with permits to carry? I don't have statistics for the latter. Do you think we're coming out ahead with the status quo?
They also went to a big mansion to rob, this was not your ordinary small town robbery. They were going to rob the place no matter what weapon they used.
Not caring for another persons life doesn't really matter if they use a gun or not. The bigger issue is that these kids did not give a damn what happened.
why? When you could just explain it. If its not that hard...
Ban private citizens.