And it has to be the most asinine waste of ink/server space yet in the gun debate. I can't find a non-mobile link from my phone, but this link to the Field and Stream response should give you the highlights. http://www.fieldandstream.com/blogs/field-notes/is-rolling-stones-five-most-dangerous-guns-in-america-the-worst-firearms-story Some highlights... Some of the comments this article has inspired are hilarious. People have been publishing their own "most dangerous" lists. For example: 5 most dangerous types of dogs: 1. Big dogs 2. Medium size dogs 3. Small dogs 4. Male dogs 5. Female dogs Seriously, does it seem to anyone else like the most anti-gun folks out there are generally also the most gun-ignorant folks? Congratulations Rolling Stone, that's some hard hitting journalism! I'm sure Kristen Gwynne can expect her Pulitzer any day now.