Russia to soon begin testing nuclear weapons?

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by aaronvan, Apr 17, 2016.

  1. aaronvan Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #1
    From pp. 150 of "My Journey at the Nuclear Brink" by former SecDef William Perry. Published Nov 25, 2015.


    http://www.wjperryproject.org/

    http://www.nti.org/
     
  2. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #2
    Hmm, maybe in response to the USA spending $1trillion to develop new "dial a nuke" weapons and our never ending march with Nato to their borders they're getting a bit worried?


    Nahhhhhhh.....cleary the big bad Russians are just crazy psychopaths and really really want their paltry $78 billion defense budget to be used for imperialism. Boo!
     
  3. aaronvan thread starter Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #3
    We've had variable-yield nukes since the early 1960s and the United States isn't developing any new nuclear warheads at the moment, although Obama is planning new, highly destabilizing mobile ground-based strategic missiles to replace our current Minuteman IIIs. He should offset the cost with his sold-gold Nobel Peace Prize, right?

    I don't blame Russia for feeling surrounded by NATO. NATO should have disappeared with the Warsaw Pact disappeared. Oh, wait, that's crazy Trump talk! I meant to say that NATO is great and should never change; in fact, it should grow larger. /s
     
  4. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #4
    Obama replaced MIRV's on our ICBM's with single warheads. The Russian did not follow suit. If there is a new arms race, it's on Russia.
     
  5. aaronvan thread starter Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #5
    We should eliminate the land-based ICBM leg of the nuclear triad. SSBM, air-launched cruise missiles, and gravity bombs are more than enough.
     
  6. mildocjr macrumors 65816

    #6
    Hopefully they test it on the palace in Pyongyang, giving under the radar warning to citizens beforehand.
     
  7. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #7
    That's a tempest in a teapot when you're looking at the overall policy. Russia under a treaty with Ukraine could post up to (Edit) it was 25,000 troops there when national security was at stake. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_Treaty_on_the_Status_and_Conditions_of_the_Black_Sea_Fleet

    I'd say from Russia's perspective having one of your only military outposts for your navy (located in Ukraine, specifically Crimea) become at risk for being overrun by both rebels and the threat of the US military having a good reason to move in it's rational they'd invoke their treaty with Ukraine.

    Now, seeing as the US knows damn well that Russia had every right AND it was the rational move on their end to move those troops in (under a treaty the USA would have to be incompetent to not know about)...the question becomes why the hell did the US decide to run to the hilltops yelling about invasions and orchestrating a coup in the country where our diplomats (Victoria Nuland, an amazingly powerful neocon in the Obama administration) chose the new leader (remember the leaked conversation?) of the country with the hope to fold UKRAINE of all places into NATO?

    But yea, Russia bad/America benevolent democracy spreader and totally not expansionist or imperialist at all. That's a much simpler way to go about looking at the world.
     
  8. blackfox macrumors 65816

    blackfox

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Location:
    PDX
    #8
    Well, on a tangent from the Nuclear - but if goes Ukraine, then goes Moldova, and then perhaps Romania. The latter being a NATO member...Russia is already well on their way with gazprom...as China well knows, the new imperialism is economic, not boots on the ground.
     
  9. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #9
    Exactly, and hell China is doing a hell of a job selling themselves to Africa as the benevolent imperialists. They're investing millions in roads, schools, hospitals to offset any shady **** they're doing alongside it.

    America is busy selling arms and setting up missiles all over the planet, while the major players in the future are buying the goodwill of other nations with (what a crazy idea) ways to improve the lives of the places they are interested in exploiting resources.

    I'm constantly amazed at how blind to this perspective problem our politicians are. It's hard to keep up the goodwill charade as we continue to sell arms to places the rest of the world are (rightly) aligned against (the Saudi regime, for one).
     
  10. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #10
    Sorry, but you've been watching too much RT, or at least it sounds like it. Both the US and Russia pledged non-aggression toward the Ukraine in return for the Ukraine disarming its nuclear forces. The Ukraine and the US have complied - Russia has not. The issue was not about troop movements in the Crimea. The issue was the annexation of all of the Crimea by a bogus election orchestrated after ethnic cleansing by the Russians. That was a blatant land grab by Russia, and an incredibly foolish move. I note that this land grab conveniently bypassed the issue of renewing Russia's right to use Sevastopol, which was set to expire in 2017. What a coincidence... :rolleyes:
     
  11. mrkramer macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #11
    That's the same BS theory that was used to justify Vietnam. And look where that got us. Do we need a few thousand more kids to die before people get the idea that we don't need to be fighting wars where we have no business?
     
  12. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #12
    Good god, "I'll define decades of tension down to an artificial starting point in order to have this extremely narrow conversation".

    Grunt grunt, America the benevolent, Russia the bloodthirsty.

    I don't watch RT or any television. I'd prefer to read about world affairs in long form...you know...books.
     
  13. aaronvan thread starter Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #13
    If it ain't got a URL it didn't happen.
     
  14. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #14
    ok, that made me laugh a bit. Thanks
     
  15. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #15
    Have you read books about appeasement?
     
  16. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #16
    What you think if we let Russia stay with it's current borders and client states they are actively looking to expand?

    Cowboy diplomacy just gets us closer to war.
     
  17. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #17
    I would be delighted if Russia expanded no further, but I have no trust in a regime that annexes territory, first denying it as Putin did, and then smugly admitting it, as Putin did. Like you, I worry about the possibility of war. The question is whether we are closer to war now that Putin annexed the Crimea. I cannot imagine anybody in their right mind would believe the answer is anything other than 'yes'.

    Agreed. Yippe ki yay.

    [​IMG]
     
  18. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #18
    As I pointed out earlier, they annexed nothing. They were well within the rights laid out by the treaty between Ukraine and Crimea to place forces there, a fact the US clearly knows but refuses to acknowledge.

    [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..._Status_and_Conditions_of_the_Black_Sea_Fleet[/url]

    I know that nobody in western media dares to mention that fact, but it doesn't stop it from being true.
     
  19. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #19
    They had rights to use the military bases there*, NOT to the entire peninsula. The did NOT have the right to hold a bogus referendum not supervised by the international community about whether Crimea should become part of Russia. They did NOT have the right to annex so much as a square meter of a sovereign nation. They did NOT have the right to use military and paramilitary forces to scare people out of there homes through violence and threats of violence. If all these actions sound like those of Germany in the 1930's, it is because they are like the actions of Germany in the 1930's. Anschluss by any other name would smell as rotten and corrupt....

    EDIT: *until 2017, NOT in perpetuity
     
  20. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #20
    And our electioneering doesn't bother you, how imperialist of you.

    Remember it's ok if its "our" team....

    Last I checked it's 2016, and treaties often sunset so they can be extended.
     
  21. thermodynamic Suspended

    thermodynamic

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #21
    If nothing else, making popcorn will become easier for a while...
    --- Post Merged, Apr 19, 2016 ---
    Aww man, uncensored pictures of centaurs! Or the results of a nuke test gone wild?

    Sorry, couldn't resist - and, yes, I'd make juvenile comments regardless who the person saddled was. If I remove my glasses and step back about 168 inches, he looks like Dick Cheney but with a better body.
    --- Post Merged, Apr 19, 2016 ---
    I didn't know and I'm in the US. But if their leaders were well within their rights per their treaties, it wouldn't be right for us to interfere, would it?
     
  22. blackfox macrumors 65816

    blackfox

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Location:
    PDX
    #22
    I feel that you misread my post.
     
  23. Raid macrumors 68020

    Raid

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Location:
    Toronto
    #23
    ... a little from column A, a little from column B...
     
  24. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
  25. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #25
    Not only would it not be right, it could be viewed internationally (legally speaking, of course not in our media) as an act of aggression. Throw clear election tampering in (voice recording of Victoria Nulan) and well what do you have?

    I can see why the Russians would be pissed.
     

Share This Page