Russian jets keep buzzing U.S. ships and planes

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by ericgtr12, Apr 19, 2016.

  1. ericgtr12 macrumors 6502a

    ericgtr12

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2015
    #1
    Under President Trump a late night Twitter threat would go out to Putin and we would be in a nuclear standoff with them within a week.

     
  2. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
  3. imhereareyou macrumors regular

    imhereareyou

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    #3
    30 feet is pretty damn close for a aircraft.
     
  4. BoxerGT2.5 macrumors 68000

    BoxerGT2.5

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    #4
    Just start putting missile systems up in Poland like no ones business.
     
  5. steve knight Suspended

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #5
    just let the sailors fly quad captors or drones around for fun see if they actually cause a plane to crash. when russ complains we say a toy took down their plane?
     
  6. ericgtr12 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    ericgtr12

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2015
    #6
    Provocative for sure, Putin sure likes to push things. Although it's worth noting that they were noticeably unarmed.
     
  7. imhereareyou macrumors regular

    imhereareyou

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    #7
    Who's to say Putin was even involved? Could be a show off pilot screwin around.
     
  8. keysofanxiety macrumors 604

    keysofanxiety

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #8
    Yeah, Russia do the same for the UK as well. It's just all flexing, really. That's politics for you.
     
  9. boast macrumors 65816

    boast

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Location:
    Phoenix
    #9
    This will become the norm with president Clinton.
     
  10. vrDrew macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #10
    The Russians already know there is a red line. They deliberately crossed it. But it was a red line. Not an invitation to go to war with Russia.

    This incident happened in the Baltic Sea; about 70 miles from Kaliningrad; which is the capital of the little Russian enclave sandwiched between Poland and Lithuania. And the Russians are kind of pissed because both Poland and Lithuania are now friends with the US. And the Russians are also kind of pissed at the US Navy vessel in question, the USS Donald Cook; which last year spent a few months cruising around the Black Sea (on the other end of Europe) in support of Romania; Bulgaria; and Ukraine - which also are now buddies with the US, after being for decades in the Soviet orbit.

    The Russians don't want to spark a war with the US. They don't want the US to shoot down their planes. They just want to make it uncomfortable for US navy sailors. The US could lodge a protest with the UN, since such behavior violates the terms of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea; but since we have failed to ratify that Treaty (thanks Republicans!) we don't have legal standing to do so. So its up to our State Department to send nasty notes to their opposite numbers in Moscow.

    So we are stuck with this choice: Either we get into a shooting war with Russia. Or we accept the fact that if we sail Naval vessels near odd bits of Russia (China; North Korea, Cuba; etc.) there is a possibility they might fly a plane or helicopter low overhead.

    The problem comes down to this: The captain of a US Navy ship has the obligation (not just the right) to defend his vessel. His orders demand he do that. But he cannot set standing orders to shoot down any aircraft that comes close his ship, because we aren't at war. And because bad things have happened, and will happen again, when military officers start shooting down unidentified aircraft during peacetime. The US President, as Commander in Chief, could order the Navy to change their policy to shoot down any unidentified aircraft that entered a specified radius. But that would probably count as a War Crime. It would inevitably end up with a very serious international incident. Which would be bad if we (deliberately) shot down a Russian fighter plane. It would be worse if we shot down a civilian airliner.
     
  11. Raid macrumors 68020

    Raid

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Location:
    Toronto
    #11
    Ah I remember the good 'ol cold war sabre rattling back in the 80's I guess it's so retro it's popular again.
     
  12. ericgtr12 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    ericgtr12

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2015
    #12
    Reagan handled that pretty well and cooler heads prevailed. Basically the opposite of what would happen with a president Trump.
     
  13. thewitt, Apr 19, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 21, 2016

    thewitt macrumors 68020

    thewitt

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    #13
    You're welcome.

    Since that treaty would have moved billions of dollars worth of oil and mineral rights in US Territorial waters into the hands of an international committee for license and distribution, the treaty is not in our best interest.

    The world socialist economy is not anything any American should support.

    The US has voluntarily accepted all other aspects of the treaty however, and continues to do so.

    Though he would never do it, we should just start buzzing the Russians at every opportunity.

    IDGAS why they are buzzing our ships.

    I hope our ships are at least locking radar tracking on these guys so they wet their flight suits on the way by.
     
  14. ericgtr12 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    ericgtr12

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2015
    #14
    The planes were unarmed. I would hope we wouldn't act unless there's a real threat, there's just no need to.
     
  15. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #15
    Damnit VR, do you have to be so damn reasonable in looking at the bigger picture here? We came here for a hyper-masculine Russia bashing and you have to bring in this drivel? :mad:
     
  16. giantfan1224 macrumors 6502a

    giantfan1224

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    #16
    Yet not that bad since Russia got away with it. ;)
     
  17. vrDrew macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #17


    You seriously do not know what you are talking about.

    The Treaty would give legal standing to US claims on resources out to the 200-mile limit. Which is why both the US Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers and the American Petroleum Institute testified in favor its passage. So did environmental groups and the professional heads of every US military service.

     
  18. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #18
    You and your damn facts! I've had it to hear with them!

    :p
     
  19. zioxide macrumors 603

    zioxide

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    #19
    Clearly Obama needs to call up Maverick and Goose so they can go communicate with these Russians.
     
  20. thewap macrumors demi-god

    thewap

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    #20

    More NWO drivel coming from the UN under the auspices of trade and "environment concerns" they treaty global domination by international corporations and banks. Much like the Trans Pacific Partnership deal they are trying to shove down our throats (congress) that would give the same groups power over our sovereignty.
     
  21. haxrnick macrumors 6502a

    haxrnick

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Location:
    Seattle
    #21
    I guess you and I have different views on what a threat is. Regardless of being unarmed, a military jet coming within 30 feet of me isn't something I'm sure many people are comfortable with.
     
  22. lostngone, Apr 19, 2016
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2016

    lostngone macrumors demi-god

    lostngone

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Location:
    Anchorage
    #22
    Would it be too provocative if they just let the CIWS radar(s) paint the incoming target? I would imagine it would at least scare the pilot to see a Phalanx tracking him as he flew by.
     
  23. ericgtr12 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    ericgtr12

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2015
    #23
    We agree there, I guess the question is what's an acceptable reaction short of shooting one down. Not that they didn't ask for that even but we have to wonder if the ship knew it was safe and acted accordingly. Of course one of those pilots almost went kamikaze so who's to say.
     
  24. webbuzz macrumors 65816

    webbuzz

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    #24
    With hashtags.
     
  25. Ironduke Suspended

    Ironduke

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Location:
    England
    #25
    we need to shoot the pilot down then give him a severe smacked bottom.
     

Share This Page