Stewart Pariodies Glenn Beck 15 min of pure gold!

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by macfan881, Mar 18, 2010.

  1. macfan881 macrumors 68020

    Feb 22, 2006
    Very Funny stuff he Mimiced his show did some glenn Ramblings at the end wound up proving bert from seasame street was a commie great stuff ill post a video when i can find one.
  2. yojitani macrumors 68000


    Apr 28, 2005
    An octopus's garden
    Although I watch the Daily Show fairly regularly, I rarely laugh. I don't find John Stewart to be a particularly good comedian. However, he hit my funny bone with that one!
  3. macfan881 thread starter macrumors 68020

    Feb 22, 2006
    ah I updated the main thread god that was awsome.
  4. yg17 macrumors G5


    Aug 1, 2004
    St. Louis, MO
  5. macfan881 thread starter macrumors 68020

    Feb 22, 2006
    Heck with a Emmy think he deserves a Oscar:D
  6. Full of Win macrumors 68030

    Full of Win

    Nov 22, 2007
    Ask Apple
    I post this only to show his true state of mind, in attacking a great man like Glenn Beck.

    I'm not posting this to derail or change topics to another one. If Jon Stewart wants to criticize another persons character, then I think his character is likewise open for criticism. As they say, turnabout is fair play.

    Yes, more rantings from the warped mind of Jon Stewart; a man who is so mentally twisted that he thinks President Truman should be tried as a WAR CRIMINAL for dropping the nuclear bomb(s) on Japan; even after the US gave Japan the Potsdam Declaration warning that they faced "prompt and utter destruction" if they did not surrender. I guess he would have been happy if hundreds of thousands of American died instead of people in a country that launched a sneak attack against the United States base and who aligned themselves with HITLER and the NAZIS beforehand.

    This man is SICK, and I post this to illustrate how mentally ill he really is. Sure, you might not agree with the actions of the US; but to call a sitting president a WAR CRIMINAL for it. Wow, his mental state is really in question to me.
  7. bobber205 macrumors 68020


    Nov 15, 2005
    Jon makes a great point. Why didn't we fire a warning shot first? (Into the ocean)
  8. Surely Guest


    Oct 27, 2007
    Los Angeles, CA
    I just finished watching it right now.

    That was absolutely brilliant.

  9. R.Perez macrumors 6502


    Feb 16, 2010
    Philadelphia, PA
    Did someone seriously just justify using nuclear weapons?

    What the **** kind of world do we live in?

    If I didn't live in Hawaii and feel disconnected from the U.S. just enough to get me by I would be trying emigrate somewhere else.

  10. Full of Win macrumors 68030

    Full of Win

    Nov 22, 2007
    Ask Apple
    We told them that they would be destroyed if they did not surrender. We did not fire a warning shot for the same reason they didn't not fire a warning torpedo when they did a sneak attack against the United States or or launch warning 'fire' ballons against the west coast of the US. Its called the element of surprise.

    However, we did warn them: We said surrender or "face prompt and utter destruction", as per the Potsdam Declaration. Those who say we did not warn Japan of "prompt and utter destruction", are either lying or ignorant of basic historical facts.

    Fact: They did not surrender, and we followed through with the Potsdam Declaration that was communicated to them beforehand.

    The point: to call a President a WAR CRIMINAL, not just disagreeing, but calling Truman a WAR CRIMINAL, for attacking Japan after warnings of "utter destruction" w/o surrender Well, I question his mental state. Moreover, need I remind you that Japan was partners with Hitler and the Nazis.
  11. IntheNet macrumors regular


    Oct 6, 2009
    Stewart is the Tickle-Me-Elmo of the left; he has no original comedy so he satirizes others, primarily those of the right, giving liberal leftists joy through his lame attempts at humor.

    Those on the right need no Stewart stooges for comedy; we just laugh at the original morons like Obama, Pelosi, and Reid. That's high comedy for us! Sheer idiocy of the Obama, Pelosi, and Reid type needs no amplification.
  12. Queso Suspended

    Mar 4, 2006
    As opposed to simply saying a sitting President is a SOCIALIST hell-bent on destroying the country?


    Hundreds of thousands of innocent Japanese died when there were military targets that could have been used to demonstrate the weapons' effectiveness. The idea of Truman having committed war crimes is a perfectly valid opinion to hold taking the evidence into account, even if you disagree with that assessment. Interesting how you dismiss it though. Did you froth at the mouth whilst posting that?
  13. Lord Blackadder macrumors G5

    Lord Blackadder

    May 7, 2004
    Sod off
    That was hilarious! :D Jon Stewart has done it again (and again and again and again).
  14. beatzfreak macrumors 6502

    Jan 11, 2006
    And two days later he admitted it was a stupid thing to say and said he really didn't think Truman was a war criminal.

    Lighten up. Glenn Beck is the one with alcohol, drug and mental issues.
  15. flopticalcube macrumors G4


    Sep 7, 2006
    In the velcro closure of America's Hat
    Really? I thought Beck was your comedy stooge. He himself admits he is a rodeo clown.
  16. Rt&Dzine macrumors 6502a


    Oct 8, 2008
    Thanks for my laugh of the day! :) Glenn Beck is such a whiney scumbag.
  17. rdowns macrumors Penryn


    Jul 11, 2003
    Comedy gold.

    Comedy gold.
  18. Queso Suspended

    Mar 4, 2006
    Just seen it as we get The Daily Show a day late over here. That was funny :D
  19. NT1440 macrumors G4


    May 18, 2008
    What exactly makes a "great man" in your book other than spoon feeding you the crap you want to hear?:confused:
  20. Eraserhead macrumors G4


    Nov 3, 2005
    It was pretty funny, scary seeing all the propaganda in the Beck clips.
  21. freeny macrumors 68020


    Sep 27, 2005
    Location: Location:
    You can really tell when the conservatives buttons are pushed in posts like this. All their responses sound like they've popped a vein and are foaming at the mouth :p
  22. TuffLuffJimmy macrumors G3


    Apr 6, 2007
    Portland, OR
    So you're equating our bombing of Japan with their attack on Pearl Harbor? Yet you don't think it was criminal? Way to do some mind gymnastics. And how did we have the element of surprise when we dropped the second bomb?

    I know you're not the best debater, but if you could try your best to rebut this I would like to continue the conversation.
  23. Full of Win macrumors 68030

    Full of Win

    Nov 22, 2007
    Ask Apple
    So, no - I'm not equating just their sneak attack aganist Pearl.

    Japan did a lot more than Pearl Harbor. We can look at the forced death marches of American captured. How about the millions of Chinese killed by Japan; while the total number murdered by Japan is not know, 10,000,000 to 20,000,000 is a common guesstimate. Finally, we can look at their alliance with pure evil (IMHO) with Hitler and Nazi Germany.

    You also seem to also forget the Potsdam Deceleration; which they REJECTED a few weeks before the attack. We warned Japan that they faced "prompt and utter destruction" if they did not give us a complete surrender.

    I'm puzzled by your last comment about "element of surprise". The US waited for dropping the second bomb to see if they would accept the Potsdam Declaration. If we were out to just kill them for grins, we would have bombed two cities at the same time. However, we did not. We waited after the first bomb, and they still did not surrender. I think the fact that we waited two days shows we were not out for blood. If we were, the better way would be to bomb two cities at the same time to keep the element of surprise.

    In my mind, President Truman had to give Japan a bloody nose to make them stop; something that does not make him a war criminal (according to Jon Stewart). If it was just for blood, we would have not given them a final chance w/ the Potsdam, we would have bombed two cities at the same time, and them we would have continued other bombing methods after the nuclear attack (e.g. fire bombing and high explosives).

    Once they surrendered, all fighting stopped. We did not rape and pillage Japan; quite the opposite, we helped them make a new Constitution and let them self govern soon after the war ended. Hardly the action of a War Criminal.

    Here is my final point: Japans actions against the United States (where 100,000 were killed), actions against China and Korea (where 10,000,000 - 20,000,000+ were killed) , and their alliance with Hitler/Nazi Germany in toto made total surrender the only acceptable outcome. Notice, I did not say their actions equated to the use of atomic bombs; it was their rejection of the Allies terms (US, China, ect...) that lead to this. If we had used them on a country that had already gave a complete surrender, then that would be criminal in my opinion. However, that is not what happened because we gave them a final chance and they rejected it.. Moreover, once they accepted the Potsdam Declaration; we stopped bombing them with conventional weapons. Look at President Truman actions BEFORE and AFTER the two atomic bombs, and tell me they were the actions of a War Criminal, according to Jon Stewart.

Share This Page