Supreme Court rules states can legalize sports betting

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by obeygiant, May 14, 2018.

  1. obeygiant macrumors 68040

    obeygiant

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Location:
    totally cool
    #1
    The Supreme Court on Monday struck down a federal law barring sports gambling, in a sweeping decision that could soon lead to legalized sports betting in dozens of states.

    The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to strike down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act.

    The decision marked a defeat for the federal government and sports organizations who fought to uphold the current ban in most states.

    The 1992 law had barred gambling on football, basketball, baseball and other sports with some exceptions, like allowing people to wager on a single game only in Nevada. The Supreme Court ruling now gives states the go-ahead to legalize sports betting if they want.

    "The legalization of sports gambling requires an important policy choice, but the choice is not ours to make," the opinion by Justice Samuel Alito said.

    "Congress can regulate sports gambling directly, but if it elects not to do so, each State is free to act on its own. Our job is to interpret the law Congress has enacted and decide whether it is consistent with the Constitution. PASPA is not,” the ruling said.

    One research firm estimated before the ruling that if the Supreme Court were to strike down the law, 32 states would likely offer sports betting within five years.

    The court's decision came in a case from New Jersey, which has fought for years to legalize gambling on sports at casinos and racetracks in the state.

    More than a dozen states had supported New Jersey, which argued that Congress exceeded its authority when it passed the 1992 Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, barring states from authorizing sports betting. New Jersey said the Constitution allows Congress to pass laws barring wagering on sports, but Congress can't require states to keep sports gambling prohibitions in place.

    All four major U.S. professional sports leagues, the NCAA and the federal government had urged the court to uphold the federal law. In court, the NBA, NFL, NHL and Major League Baseball had argued that New Jersey's gambling expansion would hurt the integrity of their games. Outside court, however, leaders of all but the NFL have shown varying degrees of openness to legalized sports gambling.


    I can finally bet on my daughter's soccer game!
     
  2. quagmire macrumors 603

    quagmire

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    #2
    Before this gets moved to PRSI and the usual suspects argue that this is proof that the right is selling out our country, this is a state vs federal issue more than anything. While I don't like gambling, this is rightfully a state issue and not a federal one.
     
  3. DoubleFlyaway macrumors 6502a

    DoubleFlyaway

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2017
    #3
    That’s not really what the Court is saying here. Congress still has the power to ban it. They just don’t have the power to “commandeer” the states into continuing to do so.
     
  4. SactoGuy18 macrumors 68030

    SactoGuy18

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA USA
    #4
    I think this could open the door for both Ladbrokes Coral and William Hill to make huge inroads into the USA market. And both companies are among the most experienced sports betting companies in the world.
     

Share This Page