The 11/13/15 Paris Attacks and the US 2A

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Praxis91, Nov 13, 2015.

  1. Praxis91 macrumors regular

    Praxis91

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
    #1
    If only those 35+ victims could have defended themselves against the savage.
     
  2. nbs2 macrumors 68030

    nbs2

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Location:
    A geographical oddity
    #2
    As many have rightly pointed out, the original Paris Attacks thread is not the place to discuss the relationship between events in France and the American 2A. I thought a new thread might help relieve that pressure.

    My views on the topic are as follows:

    1) There is some relationship worth noting between events like this and the 2A. With reports of one by one executions, what would it have hurt to have a CC there? Let's go through the outcomes:

    A) CC does nothing. People die as they have here
    B) CC shoots and hits someone who is already among the dead while trying to kill the attacker. Tragic, but the net result is the same. Only difference is the CC has to live with that - a choice they made. What the final tally would have been in absentia remains unknown.
    C) CC hits someone who would have lived. If some of those who died end up living it becomes a philosophical question. If it is in addition, we still have a CC who has to live with that choice. What it could have been remains unknown.
    D) CC accomplishes nothing but enrages the attackers who continue to kill, perhaps more quickly. This a a calculated risk by one person who had an impact on others. I'm not sure how it would be different from a government who refuses to negotiate or a segment of hostages who resist, leading to other deaths.

    E) I separate this because it could happen in any circumstance. The government storms the building and kill the CC, thinking there is another attacker. That was a choice made by the person.

    2) I'd like to wait until later to sort out how this should impact our behaviors, but is it really any different than those who attacked campus carry in the immediate aftermath of Oregon? It seems illogical to do one and not the other. I expect that there will be calls in the coming days to ban the weapons used there in the US, as if that ban served purposes in France.

    3) It is tragic that this happened, but this is part of being a free and open society. Acceptance is painful, but hopefully the French don't follow the path that we and the UK have laid down.
     
  3. aaronvan Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #3
    Well, I'm not sure we'd want a bunch of people at a heavy metal concert packing heat, but if they had armed security guards they might have stopped it when it started. We'll never know, though.
     
  4. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #4
    If guns worked as defence in this situation they'd work when the US has a school shooting.
     
  5. Moyank24 macrumors 601

    Moyank24

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Location:
    in a New York State of mind
    #5
    Or mall shootings, or theater shootings, or church shootings...
     
  6. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #6
    I thought about debating this topic, but instead I'll engage in something more worthwhile, and just bash my head repeatedly against a brick wall.
     
  7. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #7
    France can do what ever they wish to do based on their culture and laws, just like we do here .
     
  8. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #8
    A nice padded wall would be better for your head. But have fun
     
  9. .Andy macrumors 68030

    .Andy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Location:
    The Mergui Archipelago
    #9
    How I can make the deaths of 100+ innocent people about me and my love of guns.

    *posts thread*
     
  10. Mac'nCheese macrumors 68030

    Mac'nCheese

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    #10
    Right, its like everybody on facebook posting their support. A post does nothing other than say hey! Don't forget about me.

     
  11. Praxis91 thread starter macrumors regular

    Praxis91

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
  12. aaronvan Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #12
    You WILL be disarmed...just as soon as we can convene a Constitutional Convention and repeal the 2A. Probably happen any century now.
     
  13. steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #13
    Put your hackles down and calm down this is not about you.
     
  14. steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #14
    How sounds before we hear how carson and the donald would have delt with it?
     
  15. .Andy macrumors 68030

    .Andy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Location:
    The Mergui Archipelago
    #15
    Congratulations on a gun ideology so extreme that it precludes yourself from commercial air travel. You're missing out a many great experiences around the world.
     
  16. Renzatic Suspended

    Renzatic

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Location:
    Gramps, what the hell am I paying you for?
    #16
    Now's not the time to shed tears for the tragically slain! We gotta worry about gun grabbers grabbing our guns!

    Mass murders only happen every so often, and yeah, I guess they're sad and all, but our rights are ALWAYS under attack!
     
  17. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #17
    Since I knew someone would bring this up I starting to give it some thought.

    Lets say that there were some legal gun owners in the theatre when the attacks happened. Who in there would know the difference from a terrorist and a legal gun owner shooting at each other. And lets say we get past that point, when the cops do storm the building are they going to ask, ok who here is legal to carry? I don't see how any good would come out of that.
     
  18. AustinIllini macrumors demi-god

    AustinIllini

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #18
    Alley shootings, military base shootings, gun range shootings...
     
  19. AustinIllini macrumors demi-god

    AustinIllini

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #19
    No one. There would have been a violent firefight which would have killed people, and if the terrorists won the firefight, no one would be any safer for it.
     
  20. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #20
    This is why I don't buy the argument for "well if there were other people with guns everyone would be safer" It would be such a blood bath that nobody would come out a hero.
     
  21. AustinIllini macrumors demi-god

    AustinIllini

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #21
    Agreed 100%
     
  22. throwthedice macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2015
    #22
    Any reason to talk about the miracle cure that is 2nd Amendment, eh?


    Face. Palm. Smack.
     
  23. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #23
    Well some people have to show that their penis can't grow One More Inch! So they turn to guns.
     
  24. mrkramer macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #24
    This is likely what would have happened. The only difference that this happening somewhere with gun laws like the US might have made is that the terrorists might have gone for the easier to get semi automatics instead of fully automatic weapons. The slower rate of fire and smaller clips might have given people more of a chance to escape. I say that because I'm pretty sure most criminals go with what is easy to get, in the US that is guns bought legally, through a straw purchaser, or stolen from a law abiding gun owner, in Europe on the other hand nothing is easy to get so for the criminals that do manage to get them smuggled in it is just as hard to get an AK-47 from the middle east/eastern europe as it is to get anything else.
     
  25. nbs2 macrumors 68030

    nbs2

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Location:
    A geographical oddity
    #25
    Directly? No. Which is why I tried to break this out of the main attack thread. What really gets me entertained is that you can tell who didn't take 30 seconds to read the initial post and see that I already explained this is why I started the thread. That type of knee-jerk illiteracy is a great reminder of why I stopped coming here for years.

    Indirectly? An attack anywhere should be discussed in light of how it could or would affect you locally. Are you suggesting that air traffic and sky-jacking shouldn't have been discussed in France from the perspective of the French or mass transit attacks in South Korea from the perspective of the Koreans? Any conversation about how such an attack as today's, taking place in the United States, would necessarily connect closely to the 2A.
     

Share This Page