The Intercept: EXCLUSIVE: New Email Leak Reveals Clinton Campaign’s Cozy Press Relationship

Jess13

Suspended
Original poster
Nov 3, 2013
464
2,402
Clinton Media Operatives given “their” stories from Team Hillary! These dishonest Clinton Media Operatives never gave the disclosure that “their” stories were written by Team Hillary. Haha. :p


EXCLUSIVE: New Email Leak Reveals Clinton Campaign’s Cozy Press Relationship

https://theintercept.com/2016/10/09/exclusive-new-email-leak-reveals-clinton-campaigns-cozy-press-relationship/

Internal strategy documents and emails among Clinton staffers shed light on friendly and highly useful relationships between the campaign and various members of the U.S. media, as well as the campaign’s strategies for manipulating those relationships.

[...]

At times, Clinton’s campaign staff not only internally drafted the stories they wanted published but even specified what should be quoted “on background” and what should be described as “on the record.”

One January 2015 strategy document – designed to plant stories on Clinton’s decision-making process about whether to run for president – singled out reporter Maggie Haberman, then of Politico, now covering the election for the New York Times, as a “friendly journalist” who has “teed up” stories for them in the past and “never disappointed” them.

[continue]​
 
Last edited:

nfl46

macrumors 604
Oct 5, 2008
6,908
3,977
Welcome to the world of politics. None of this crap surprises me anymore.
 

Jess13

Suspended
Original poster
Nov 3, 2013
464
2,402
Welcome to the world of politics. None of this crap surprises me anymore.
Welcome to the world of Hillary Apologista, where they have to auto-defend planted stories in mainstream media, stories published without proper, standard disclosure.
More attempts by the Russian state to interfere in the US election :(.
No evidence the Russian state has been responsible for any of these hacks. The newly released DNI paper states:
Haha. :p

Seven Reasons the New Russian Hack Announcement Is a Big Deal

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/seven-reasons-the-new-russian-hack-announcement-is-a-big-deal-214330

1. There's probably serious evidence. DHS statement formally accuses the Russian government of hacking emails and passing them to organizations like WikiLeaks, but stops short of blaming the Kremlin for hacking voter machines. The latter, according to this joint statement from the U.S. intelligence community, “in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company.” It goes to note: “However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government.” That is: There was enough there for the intelligence community to mention the breaches and their connection to Russia, but not quite enough to truly tie it to the Kremlin. That makes the opening of the statement—“that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized” the hack and handoffs—that much more glaring. You don’t make a declaration like that unless you really have that evidence.​
 

Eraserhead

macrumors G4
Nov 3, 2005
10,300
10,384
UK
No evidence the Russian state has been responsible for any of these hacks. The newly released DNI paper states:
It's Guccifer 2.0 a "Romanian" source who refused to speak Romanian to the New York Times.
 

Jess13

Suspended
Original poster
Nov 3, 2013
464
2,402
It's Guccifer 2.0 a "Romanian" source who refused to speak Romanian to the New York Times.
And that proves nothing about Russian state involvement, so again, from the DNI:
Haha. :p

Seven Reasons the New Russian Hack Announcement Is a Big Deal

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/seven-reasons-the-new-russian-hack-announcement-is-a-big-deal-214330

1. There's probably serious evidence. DHS statement formally accuses the Russian government of hacking emails and passing them to organizations like WikiLeaks, but stops short of blaming the Kremlin for hacking voter machines. The latter, according to this joint statement from the U.S. intelligence community, “in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company.” It goes to note: “However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government.” That is: There was enough there for the intelligence community to mention the breaches and their connection to Russia, but not quite enough to truly tie it to the Kremlin. That makes the opening of the statement—“that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized” the hack and handoffs—that much more glaring. You don’t make a declaration like that unless you really have that evidence.​
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrewDaHilp1

Peace

macrumors Core
Apr 1, 2005
19,467
3,833
Space--The ONLY Frontier
Hmm...Interesting how these things work.

My guess as to one of the reasons Clinton talks to most of the news outlets. Which is what this is. Is because she will talk to them.

Drumpf on the other hand will only talk to Hannity.
 

Jess13

Suspended
Original poster
Nov 3, 2013
464
2,402
Hmm...Interesting how these things work.

My guess as to one of the reasons Clinton talks to most of the news outlets. Which is what this is. Is because she will talk to them.

Drumpf on the other hand will only talk to Hannity.
Trump has been the most accessible candidate in U.S. history, appearing on the record on more networks, shows and programs than anyone prior.

It proves they aren't Romanian as claimed.
Thank you for proving my point: No evidence showing Russian state involvement
 

Eraserhead

macrumors G4
Nov 3, 2005
10,300
10,384
UK
Thank you for proving my point: No evidence showing Russian state involvement
Other than the US security services and the DNC investigators saying it is the Russians.

And it shows they are lying about their nationality. Why bother?
 

webbuzz

macrumors 68000
Jul 24, 2010
1,522
5,641
Also wouldn't be surprised if there is some iteration of the JournoList working again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jess13

Jess13

Suspended
Original poster
Nov 3, 2013
464
2,402
Other than the US security services saying it is the Russians.
You should try to read what you’re replying to before you reply to it.


Seven Reasons the New Russian Hack Announcement Is a Big Deal

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/seven-reasons-the-new-russian-hack-announcement-is-a-big-deal-214330

1. There's probably serious evidence. DHS statement formally accuses the Russian government of hacking emails and passing them to organizations like WikiLeaks, but stops short of blaming the Kremlin for hacking voter machines. The latter, according to this joint statement from the U.S. intelligence community, “in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company.” It goes to note: “However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government.” That is: There was enough there for the intelligence community to mention the breaches and their connection to Russia, but not quite enough to truly tie it to the Kremlin. That makes the opening of the statement—“that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized” the hack and handoffs—that much more glaring. You don’t make a declaration like that unless you really have that evidence.​
 

Peace

macrumors Core
Apr 1, 2005
19,467
3,833
Space--The ONLY Frontier
Trump has been the most accessible candidate in U.S. history, appearing on the record on more networks, shows and programs than anyone prior.


Thank you for proving my point: No evidence showing Russian state involvement
Can you refine that to what "news" shows he personally appears on ? Regularly.
 

samcraig

macrumors P6
Jun 22, 2009
16,610
35,229
USA
Trump has been the most accessible candidate in U.S. history, appearing on the record on more networks, shows and programs than anyone prior.
Trump is a publicity whore who would call a press conference to show people he knew how to tie his own shoes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plutonius

Michael Goff

Suspended
Jul 5, 2012
13,262
7,298
But did they make Trump say things that make him seem like an ignorant, xenophobic, rapist?
 

Eraserhead

macrumors G4
Nov 3, 2005
10,300
10,384
UK
You should try to read what you’re replying to before you reply to it.


Seven Reasons the New Russian Hack Announcement Is a Big Deal

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/seven-reasons-the-new-russian-hack-announcement-is-a-big-deal-214330

1. There's probably serious evidence. DHS statement formally accuses the Russian government of hacking emails and passing them to organizations like WikiLeaks, but stops short of blaming the Kremlin for hacking voter machines. The latter, according to this joint statement from the U.S. intelligence community, “in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company.” It goes to note: “However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government.” That is: There was enough there for the intelligence community to mention the breaches and their connection to Russia, but not quite enough to truly tie it to the Kremlin. That makes the opening of the statement—“that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized” the hack and handoffs—that much more glaring. You don’t make a declaration like that unless you really have that evidence.​
Why would the US security services blame the Russian government if they didn't think it was them?
 

Jess13

Suspended
Original poster
Nov 3, 2013
464
2,402
Trump is a publicity whore who would call a press conference to show people he knew how to tie his own shoes.
True, Trump is and that is why he has been the most accessible in U.S. history.
 

samcraig

macrumors P6
Jun 22, 2009
16,610
35,229
USA
He has appeared on too many to count.
[doublepost=1476049081][/doublepost]
Prove it, post your evidence or delete your comment.
I'm not deleting my comment. Let me know when you delete everything you've said and positioned as fact vs opinion.
 

Jess13

Suspended
Original poster
Nov 3, 2013
464
2,402
I'm not deleting my comment. Let me know when you delete everything you've said and positioned as fact vs opinion.
No evidence? Take your defeat for fake facts in stride.

Prove it, post your evidence or delete your comment.
Remember yesterday, when you said the same to me about war crimes and I did then you shut right up and didn’t say another word? Yeah, I could do the same with Trump being most accessible in history, but if you had been watching mainstream media the past year you would already know that he has been on TV constantly, throughout the political spectrum.