The Time Ted Cruz Defended a Ban on Dildos


FieldingMellish

Suspended
Jun 20, 2010
2,440
3,079
he needed something to satisfy his girlfriends after they found out that being a huge dick did not mean he had one :p
Excellent. Hats off to you, sir. :)

But we still need a guy like Cruz to head off at the pass the unrestrained Sodom and Gammorah of where portions of the US has been heading. It's as unrestricted as the porous American border.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meister

MadeTheSwitch

macrumors 6502a
Apr 20, 2009
825
15,188

thermodynamic

Suspended
May 3, 2009
1,336
1,175
USA
...the unrestrained Sodom and Gammorah of where portions of the US has been heading. It's as unrestricted as the porous American border.
Like this passage, Ezekiel 23:20? Oops, I mean Ezekiel 16:49, that's easy to mix up...

"'Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.

Oh, wait, S&G were Old Testament cities. As Christians love to cite when being reminded of shellfish and divorce and copulation and stuff, the Old Testament was overrode by the New - so the tale of S&G doesn't apply.

Unless you consider Matthew 5:17-19 since it's obvious who's read it and who hasn't...

Pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheHateMachine

FieldingMellish

Suspended
Jun 20, 2010
2,440
3,079
Like this passage, Ezekiel 23:20? Oops, I mean Ezekiel 16:49, that's easy to mix up...

"'Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.

Oh, wait, S&G were Old Testament cities. As Christians love to cite when being reminded of shellfish and divorce and copulation and stuff, the Old Testament was overrode by the New - so the tale of S&G doesn't apply.

Unless you consider Matthew 5:17-19 since it's obvious who's read it and who hasn't...

Pathetic.
Struggling for a response much? :)

That's pathetic.
 

Robisan

macrumors 6502
Jan 19, 2014
337
2,035
Heh, indeed!

In perhaps the most noticeable line of the brief, Cruz’s office declared, “There is no substantive-due-process right to stimulate one’s genitals for non-medical purposes unrelated to procreation or outside of an interpersonal relationship.” That is, the pursuit of such happiness had no constitutional standing.
[doublepost=1460647212][/doublepost]Cruz's college roommate @clmazin:

Ted Cruz did not have a dildo stashed under his pillow. Ted Cruz slept on top of his pillow.​
 
  • Like
Reactions: hulugu

PracticalMac

macrumors 68030
Jan 22, 2009
2,745
3,706
Houston, TX
Heh, indeed!

In perhaps the most noticeable line of the brief, Cruz’s office declared, “There is no substantive-due-process right to stimulate one’s genitals for non-medical purposes unrelated to procreation or outside of an interpersonal relationship.” That is, the pursuit of such happiness had no constitutional standing.
Well, technically he is correct.
"Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." is in the Declaration of Independence.

Does not make him any less evil, anyway.

....
WOW, reading the article makes me really hate him. He wants to impose Christian Sharia law on everyone. (edit spelling)

.....
BTW, here is the status on the law § 43.23. OBSCENITY. , which amazingly is still being enforced.
More here, and here.

And a DOOZY of comment in this article.
Ted Cruz thinks people don't have a right to "stimulate their genitals." I was his college roommate. This would be a new belief of his.
9:35 AM - 13 Apr 2016
https://twitter.com/clmazin/status/720259227067920385

Republicans really want to be in everyone's bed (let alone bedroom, or any room)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HEK and Robisan