Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Air looks bad comparing to that 16 Pro. What’s even the point of upgrading from 16 pro to Air?
Aesthetical reason (new form), plus 16 Pro has awful battery, with 90 cycles it gives me about 4.5 hours of screen time. Today I used Air with Maps and stuff, it gave me 6 hours of screen time and I even have 10% more percents of the battery
 
So true regarding Samsung panels and diamond pentile panels. I remember this discussion when Samsung introduced this also at the time. The article that the poster linked to was nothing more than hearsay. Personally I don’t buy into Samsung panel P or Q or N having any sort of grading attributes to them.
You know what would be cool? Discovering these panels have been made by LG all this time, or some of them (like the beloved G9N), and Samsung making GVC or GH3.

Imagine that of a conspiracy 😂
 
I have a strange issue. Left is iPhone Air, right is 16 Pro. Both phones have GVC according to 3utools. But on Air white looks... a bit strange. Also Air gives me eyestrain and just a little bit dizziness. It didnt on 1-2 days, but since the 3rd day it does (now the 5th). Was thinking about selling my 16 Pro, but now i'm on a fence
Is the true tone enable? It's not possible such a difference.
 
Is the true tone enable? It's not possible such a diffence
Nope, both screens without True Tone. You can see the difference in the dark too. Again the same brightness (about 2000nits), no true tone
 

Attachments

  • photo_2025-11-07_00-03-08.jpg
    photo_2025-11-07_00-03-08.jpg
    68.2 KB · Views: 37
  • Sad
Reactions: nickelro
Probably just a bad unit, but damn, when an LG panel comes out bad, it really comes out bad, lol.
Mick, can I ask you something? I got a nice panel, at least for my liking, but this 17 pro has a weird gap on the top right, it’s not that big, but I can see some internals there between frame and screen. I’m thinking to return it, idk. What would you do?
 
It’s a very poorly documented article that also does a disservice to Samsung panels by using as an example something that has always been considered a botched design in circles that discuss OLED panels. In this very forum there are dozens of threads talking about PenTile or, as Samsung perhaps calls it for marketing reasons, Diamond Pixel.

In any case, one thing must also be taken into account: user preferences. Ninety percent of the new participants in this thread judge a panel’s quality solely by whether or not it shows color shift when tilted. In the past, as in the thread I shared recently, people tended to prioritize uniformity and color tint when viewed head-on as the main criteria for evaluating an OLED panel’s quality.

I suppose times change, and so do users. I know what matters to me, and I’m not trying to convince anyone to think like I do—but I do like discussing the many other factors that affect the quality of an OLED panel.
In my case, as a hobbyist photographer for over 20 years with many paid gigs, I use apple products mainly for the Color. For the color calibration in their screens (MacBook iPad iPhone) and for the coloring in the cameras. I can’t stand any android phone, Apple delivers the Colors I’m expecting to see when I edit my pictures. I am very sensitive to color. For the same reason I left Sony and I can only use Canon nowadays.

My first oled display in a phone was the iPhone X and that screen was perfect. Then I switched to the 13 pro max and the screen had a slight green tint that I could see. Not as bad as Samsung phones I used to see from friends, but still I could notice. Now this 17 pro max is just a tad greener than the 13 pro. Am I wrong wanting a more color neutral screen than in the phone I used to have 8 years ago?

Fortunately I haven’t experienced uniformity issues. But yes this one also shows worse viewing angles than my previous phones. And I’m so pissed because in the Apple Store all the Pro had a gorgeous screen and all the pro max had this green tinting screen, but I wanted the bigger size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alien_a
This is I think the whole entire reason some peole
Cannot be unconvinced all LG = crap

They haven’t seen a good one and LG seems to have lower standards on average. Anecdotally …
Man, let’s get out of this endless loop. I don’t do it because I don’t have the time — and someone would probably say I need to get a life — but if I started collecting examples of really bad Samsung panels with terrible uniformity and more color tint than the Pink Panther, I’d never finish.

There are truly bad panels in every manufacturer.
 
In my case, as a hobbyist photographer for over 20 years with many paid gigs, I use apple products mainly for the Color. For the color calibration in their screens (MacBook iPad iPhone) and for the coloring in the cameras. I can’t stand any android phone, Apple delivers the Colors I’m expecting to see when I edit my pictures. I am very sensitive to color. For the same reason I left Sony and I can only use Canon nowadays.

My first oled display in a phone was the iPhone X and that screen was perfect. Then I switched to the 13 pro max and the screen had a slight green tint that I could see. Not as bad as Samsung phones I used to see from friends, but still I could notice. Now this 17 pro max is just a tad greener than the 13 pro. Am I wrong wanting a more color neutral screen than in the phone I used to have 8 years ago?

Fortunately I haven’t experienced uniformity issues. But yes this one also shows worse viewing angles than my previous phones. And I’m so pissed because in the Apple Store all the Pro had a gorgeous screen and all the pro max had this green tinting screen, but I wanted the bigger size.
What this thread is meant to say is that you can get a bad experience with Samsung panels too, and here I believe we can all agree on this part.

The human eye spots the green faster than the pink/reddish tint, and you are not in the wrong for wanting a good panel - in fact all of us want this and that's the very issue of this thread and its many pages - you're by no means protected by a Samsung panel just because it's Samsung, that's the thing.

We also came to agree that LG panels tend to be more colour accurate than Samsung's which tend to oversaturate colours.

So whether it's green or reddish tint, I believe it's more important to focus on uniformity and lack of grain. We also discussed how all OLEDS have weird tints when viewed at an angle, it's just that green is more obvious than red.

Samsung is just a popular choice, but as we discussed here, it's popular without any clear evidence - hell, Samsung panels can have green tint and grain too.
 
BTW, I’ll say it again. Once properly calibrated, my Samsung QD-OLED TV has the best IQ I’ve ever seen.

It actually reminds me (though not quite the same) of those wonderful plasma TVs Panasonic used to make back in the day.

I’m saying this so no one thinks I have anything against Samsung.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: kirk.vino
What this thread is meant to say is that you can get a bad experience with Samsung panels too, and here I believe we can all agree on this part.

The human eye spots the green faster than the pink/reddish tint, and you are not in the wrong for wanting a good panel - in fact all of us want this and that's the very issue of this thread and its many pages - you're by no means protected by a Samsung panel just because it's Samsung, that's the thing.

We also came to agree that LG panels tend to be more colour accurate than Samsung's which tend to oversaturate colours.

So whether it's green or reddish tint, I believe it's more important to focus on uniformity and lack of grain. We also discussed how all OLEDS have weird tints when viewed at an angle, it's just that green is more obvious than red.

Samsung is just a popular choice, but as we discussed here, it's popular without any clear evidence - hell, Samsung panels can have green tint and grain too.
I agree. The calibration in this panel is better than other brands from my workmates around, and so are the viewing angles with compared to Samsung s24+ etc.
however for example a mate has the iPhone 14 with Samsung G9P panel and it’s just perfect compared to mine. It’s a bit embarrassing seeing how a 3 year newer phone and way more expensive has a worse panel.

But yes, so far the uniformity of this panel is perfect, quite sharp and very good calibration. And in this case this one is a bit punchier in color than my previous 13 pro max (and this is LG, the 13 is Samsung).

At home I have a LG OLED and spent sometime calibrating it and decided not to obsess that much, I’ll do same with this phone for my mental health xD.
 
I agree. The calibration in this panel is better than other brands from my workmates around, and so are the viewing angles with compared to Samsung s24+ etc.
however for example a mate has the iPhone 14 with Samsung G9P panel and it’s just perfect compared to mine. It’s a bit embarrassing seeing how a 3 year newer phone and way more expensive has a worse panel.

But yes, so far the uniformity of this panel is perfect, quite sharp and very good calibration. And in this case this one is a bit punchier in color than my previous 13 pro max (and this is LG, the 13 is Samsung).

At home I have a LG OLED and spent sometime calibrating it and decided not to obsess that much, I’ll do same with this phone for my mental health xD.
If when you say "perfect" you mean brighter, that's because newer phones hit maximum brightness only outdoors, peak brightness for 17 series, indoors, is around 1600 nits only...

If you mean the lack of tint when viewed at an angle, that's unfortunately screen lottery - we've seen some really bad and grainy G9P panels in this thread :')
 
If when you say "perfect" you mean brighter, that's because newer phones hit maximum brightness only outdoors, peak brightness for 17 series, indoors, is around 1600 nits only...

If you mean the lack of tint when viewed at an angle, that's unfortunately screen lottery - we've seen some really bad and grainy G9P panels in this thread :')

I mean viewing angles and whiter whites.
 
Depends but i have a great LG even at low brightness so they arent bad by the end of the day.
Keep comparing mine to my 13 pro max.
The GH3 in the 17 pro max is perfect in low light brightness greys, whereas the Samsung G9N in the 13 pro max is super green (viewing up front).
In the new phone the pictures pop out a bit more (even when comparing to a 15 pro max with G9N here at work), so overall the panel is good (also I guess because of the higher nits), but the bottom green tint when tilting a bit is quite annoying.
I live in Hong Kong, so not possible to return to play the panel lottery. You can only return if something is really defective, which is not easy to proof, especially because all pro max I have seen in the apple stores here have the same issue...
 
Keep comparing mine to my 13 pro max.
The GH3 in the 17 pro max is perfect in low light brightness greys, whereas the Samsung G9N in the 13 pro max is super green (viewing up front).
In the new phone the pictures pop out a bit more (even when comparing to a 15 pro max with G9N here at work), so overall the panel is good (also I guess because of the higher nits), but the bottom green tint when tilting a bit is quite annoying.
I live in Hong Kong, so not possible to return to play the panel lottery. You can only return if something is really defective, which is not easy to proof, especially because all pro max I have seen in the apple stores here have the same issue...
I share your impressions. I had a 15 Pro G9N, not greenish like your 13 Pro Max but pinkish at the bottom, and now an LG panel which, like yours, is perfectly uniform even at low brightness, and where photos also look better and more natural than on the G9N.

Does the color shift when tilted bother me a bit? Of course, I’m not going to deny it. But paraphrasing MrGimper, they’d have to take this phone from my cold dead hands.
 
  • Love
Reactions: nickelro
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.