First the Obama adminstration said that GM, Ford, Chrysler were "too big to fail", plunking billions of dollard down to save them, and now they're requiring that Chrysler merge with Fiat to receive more billions of dollars in government funds... Apparently being 'to big to fail' is something to aspire to? Something the U.S. taxpayers should pay to see happen? Maybe a supporter of the Obama administration could help us out on this one? I, like I think most free market Americans, and apparently the Canadian Industry Minister Tony Clement tend to think otherwise... that no company is or should be "too big to fail." We know that in the end, propping up failing businesses and allowing the bubble to ever expand... just means that you'll deal with more pain, more suffering, more jobs lost, a larger depression, later on.