Trump administration ending Michelle Obama's girls education program

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by samcraig, May 1, 2017.

  1. samcraig macrumors P6

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #1
    Perhaps because it's not about helping people in this country - and because it has an Obama named attached...

    " 'Let Girls Learn' had several years of funding already baked," she said. "We were hopeful that given that, it could continue. But obviously elections have consequences, and nobody knows that better than we."

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/01/politics/trump-michelle-obama-girls-education/index.html

    "Perdue was set to unveil a rule change "providing regulatory flexibility for the National School Lunch Program" during a visit to Catoctin Elementary School in Leesburg. It wasn't immediately clear how Perdue's announcement would alter the nutritional makeup of school lunches nationwide, though health advocacy groups warned that backtracking could prove dangerous for children."

    I do hope whatever is decided moves the needle forward not back when it comes to nutrition in schools.
     
  2. DrewDaHilp1 macrumors 6502a

    DrewDaHilp1

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    All Your Memes Are Belong to US
    #2
    "The "Let Girls Learn" program, which she and President Barack Obama started in 2015 to facilitate educational opportunities for adolescent girls in developing countries, will cease operation immediately, according to an internal document obtained by CNN."

    How about we worry about educating our own citizens before we go focusing on educating third worlders?
     
  3. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #3
    school lunch program needs to be scrapped.it's a waste with plenty of it going to .........waste.

    from link.
    so they are seemingly just killing the name of it.
     
  4. BeeGood macrumors 68000

    BeeGood

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Location:
    Lot 23E. Somewhere in Georgia.
    #4
    There is plenty of education to be had in this country for those who truly desire it.

    My understanding is that this program was focused on places where education was purposely withheld from girls, like places in the Middle East and Africa. I have no idea how effective it is/was, but it's interesting that the article states that most of the program activities will continue, just not under the name "Let Girls Learn".
     
  5. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #5
    extremist groups might target those learning there , so it makes sense to remove the name from it.
     
  6. samcraig thread starter macrumors P6

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #6
    Especially if that name is associated with a successful program under Michelle Obama. Why would Trump (any of them) want a success they can't take credit for? Rebrand it and call it their own!
     
  7. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #7
    http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-24379018
    in other stone age areas they get shot for going to school, Kudos to M.O for helping them learn, give it a different name and keep them as safe as possible.
     
  8. samcraig thread starter macrumors P6

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #8
    I'll wait to see what the new branding is called before I judge. I hear Trump U is available - and doesn't have the word girl in it...
     
  9. BeeGood macrumors 68000

    BeeGood

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Location:
    Lot 23E. Somewhere in Georgia.
    #9
    That's perfectly fine if that is what's going on. So why not state that? Why isn't the administration saying, "In the interest of protecting the girls the program serves from harm, we are changing the name to something less conspicuous".
     
  10. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #10
    because you can see through cheeto hitler, he is IMHO working on dismantling whatever obama did, this may be part of it but it's only being re-branded and not killed. IIRC that was his campaign promise and he is working on it
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidd...-undo-obamas-legacy-in-one-week/#217186141c4f

    http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-barack-obama-trump-transition-executive-orders-544838

    https://www.google.com/search?q=tru...rome..69i57.6159j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
     
  11. mac_in_tosh macrumors regular

    mac_in_tosh

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2016
    Location:
    Earth
    #11
    AP reports: "New nutrition standards for school lunches were announced today: Schools won't have to cut the salt in kids' meals just yet. And they can skip the whole grains and replace the non-fat milk with 1 percent. That's the word from the Trump administration on Monday."
     
  12. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #12
    hope kids start eating again instead of throwing it in the trash like they have been
     
  13. JayMysterio macrumors 6502

    JayMysterio

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Location:
    Rock Ridge, California
    #13
    That's a wonderful sentiment, unfortunately it's not one that this administration seems to share as strongly as you.

    http://www.politico.com/tipsheets/m...ding-outlook-bleak-under-trumps-budget-219012

    http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2017/03/trump_cut_teacher_funding_meaning_schools.html

    https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...18-billion-in-domestic-spending-cuts-for-2017

    It's one thing to make cuts to educational programs abroad, it's another thing to make cuts as well to domestic educational programs, and NOT use any savings to shore up the shortfalls. That's just plain making cuts en masse to educational as a whole.
     
  14. juanm macrumors 65816

    juanm

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Location:
    Fury 161
    #14
    It's called Miss USA.
     
  15. hulugu macrumors 68000

    hulugu

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    quae tangit perit Trump
    #15
    Got a source to back that claim up?
     
  16. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #16
  17. hulugu macrumors 68000

    hulugu

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    quae tangit perit Trump
    #17
    Read the article.

    First, the argument against the Obama program came from:

    Second, from the article:

    Nutrition went up, meal participation remained steady. Its as if the few anecdotes of students complaining about the lunch room food were just anecdotes.

    And, really, this is no surprise. Cafeteria food has always sucked, but the Obama-era structure tried to improve nutrition. The fact that some cafeteria decided to serve "mystery mush" is not because of the rules, instead that's because some school administrator decided to buy the cheapest thing he could find.

    (My college's cafeteria was widely known as the same contractor that served prison meals, so no wonder so much of the food was mystery goop. This is how I kept myself in beer money by making Sunday chili in the dorm's kitchen and charging people for $2 for a bowl.)

    Moreover, many schools used the program to build gardens and create food-to-table programs, allowing fresh organic vegetables to be included in the school lunch.

    As usual, conservatives rushed for an easy way to bash the Obamas without attempting to understand the implications of the program—kids got healthier lunches.
     
  18. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #18
    anecdote on your way, at my daughters school when the wife worked there plenty ended up in the trash. this is Murika, home of honey boo boo so it's easy to see kids just dumping it & complaining.........
     
  19. hulugu macrumors 68000

    hulugu

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    quae tangit perit Trump
    #19
    Sure, but how much food was rejected before the program was enacted? How was the program enacted? Did the program at that school change its contract? Did the change sustain over time, or did kids simply adjust?

    In other words, what confounding variables make this anecdote meaningless?

    And, moreover, if some students refuse to eat the carrots because they want french fries, should the school lunch program be about giving kids want they want, or what they need?

    Again, estimates showed that kids got more vitamins and most kids continued to get lunches, and since there wasn't a sudden malnutrition crisis, we can estimate that kids probably complained for a bit, but continued eating the food.

    Stop going for the easy answer. Why would a lobbying organization, along with conservatives, give a whit about the food habits of American school children?

    Because they care? (Cue for laughter)

    No, because the lobbying organization was working for contractors that made school lunches who believed the new rules under Michelle Obama's program made producing this food more expensive. Rather than using cheap fillers—like pink slime in "chicken nuggets"—they were required to dig up a vegetable or two. And, that hit their bottom line so they complained and turned this into political juice that "Freedom fry" conservatives were only too happy to carry.
     
  20. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #20
    it's a 4 BILLION "food" program, if course things got more expensive and we paid for it. my daughter took her own lunch till it was no longer "cool" to do so :( "Mija, these pendejos wish they could have a torta for lunch" oh well.
     
  21. vrDrew, May 1, 2017
    Last edited: May 1, 2017

    vrDrew macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #21
    Ending the "Let Girls Learn" program is just another example of what a petty, spiteful, small-minded, short-sighted little piece of human waste Donald Trump is.

    There really isn't any rational reason to do this: Most of the money comes from private sources or NGOs. The relatively small amount (<$50 million) of US Government funding is already "baked in" to the budgets. The program has had some demonstrated successes that far outweigh its costs.

    In developing countries, there is a very real problem with adolescent girls being excluded from the educational system. And research has shown that keeping girls in school combats everything from over-population and poverty to the spread of fundamentalist extremism.

    But Donald "grab 'em by the *****" Trump has got better things to do. Congress has just allocated an extra $120 million to provide security for Trump and his adult children. That's in addition to the hundreds of millions already budgeted for Presidential security. And $120 million is several times the annual "Let Girls Learn" budget.

     
  22. mac_in_tosh macrumors regular

    mac_in_tosh

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2016
    Location:
    Earth
    #22
    So we just sink to the lowest common denominator, give the kids the cheap junk they are used to eating and seeing in advertisements and don't try to reverse the continuing rise in the cost of health care that will ultimately bankrupt the nation? That seems like a great policy.

    I guess in addition to being climate change deniers, the GOP is also against well-established nutritional science. Of course, I wouldn't expect more from our overweight, junk-food loving Tweeter-In-Chief.
     
  23. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #23
    if you give the kids lobster & they throw it away, are they not hungry enough for you?
    kids don't eat apples/veggies at HOME, you think they will eat them at school?
     
  24. tgara macrumors 6502a

    tgara

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2012
    Location:
    Connecticut, USA
    #24
    Right on. People arguing otherwise obviously don't have kids! :D
     
  25. mac_in_tosh macrumors regular

    mac_in_tosh

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2016
    Location:
    Earth
    #25
    I thought the purpose of school is to educate kids.
     

Share This Page