Trump's appointment of son-in-law could rest on Clinton precedent

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by jkcerda, Feb 8, 2017.

  1. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #1
  2. samcraig macrumors P6

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #2
  3. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #3
    I , just like the rest of America , suffer the consequences of your inaction. :eek:
     
  4. samcraig macrumors P6

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #4
    Rally, Party of 1
     
  5. daflake macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    #5
    yes it is... ;)
     
  6. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #6
    pretty much how I feel at times :(
     
  7. LizKat macrumors 68040

    LizKat

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Location:
    Catskill Mountains
    #7
    For my money they could put Barron Trump in there if they wanted as long as they ditched Bannon & Co.
     
  8. DrewDaHilp1 macrumors 6502a

    DrewDaHilp1

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    All Your Memes Are Belong to US
    #8
    He's good at the computers. I bet he could get an Obamacare website up and running faster and cheaper.
     
  9. SusanK macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2012
    #9
    The issue at that time was a possible violation of a sunshine law. Clintons have/had transparency issues from the beginning. The then First Lady working on a health care law was not at issue. It was lack of transparency.

    There is an Office of the First Lady with staff funded by the government. To date there is no office of the son-in-law.

    This HRC fixation of the OP may benefit from professional intervention. HRC is finished.

    http://www.nytimes.com/1993/03/06/us/hillary-clinton-s-health-role-disputed.html
     
  10. WarHeadz macrumors 6502a

    WarHeadz

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2015
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #10
    He better go ahead and do that then, because I don't think Obamacare is going anywhere anytime soon. The words "repeal and replace" are slowly being phased out, and the word "repair" is being used more and more.
     
  11. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #11
    When she's jailed I'll let it go :D
    Son in law is not getting paid IIRC
     
  12. SusanK macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2012
    #12
    FLOTUS is not a paid position.
     
  13. Snoopy4 macrumors 6502a

    Snoopy4

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2014
    #13
    It's dying on its own. Doesn't need any help to go away.
     
  14. steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #14
    Yes so he can run his business with it dealing with those silly ethics laws.
     
  15. Desertrat macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2003
    Location:
    Terlingua, Texas
    #15
    Note that President John Fitzgerald Kennedy appointed his brother to be US Attorney General. 1961.
     
  16. Raid macrumors 68020

    Raid

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Location:
    Toronto
    #16
    At least he had a law degree...
     
  17. mudslag macrumors regular

    mudslag

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    #17


    It's not the he's using the power of EO, it's how he's using it.


    For example

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ting-us-president-jeff-sessions-a7572001.html


    He doesn't even have power at the state levels, so wtf is he even trying to accomplish. Then he makes a statement of "to break the back of the criminal cartels that have spread across our nation"...wtf does that even mean?

    He goes on rants about crime being high when statistics show crime and murder has dropped over the last decade. The man is not mentally sane.
     

Share This Page