Two-thirds of likely Republican primary voters support Trump's Muslim ban proposals

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by jnpy!$4g3cwk, Dec 9, 2015.

  1. jnpy!$4g3cwk macrumors 65816

    jnpy!$4g3cwk

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    #1
    [​IMG]
    http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...mberg-politics-poll-trump-muslim-ban-proposal

    It is an online poll, so, I don't expect great accuracy, but, disturbing none the less.
     
  2. jnpy!$4g3cwk thread starter macrumors 65816

    jnpy!$4g3cwk

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    #2
  3. mrsir2009 macrumors 604

    mrsir2009

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #3
    All Muslims who are citizens of foreign countries? Then why is everyone getting worked up over the whole "Muslim servicemen not being able to return to their country" stuff?
     
  4. PracticalMac macrumors 68030

    PracticalMac

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    #4
    No one should be surprised with results and why.

    Even excluding the "not involved" group, it is very likely the "pro ban" group is still in majority.
    After all, the Republicans want to keep they While Male Christian dominance, and will eagerly point to the (half) "Black Muslim president" "destroying" America as an example of WMC superiority.
     
  5. FieldingMellish Suspended

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    #5

    Naww. Just time to apply some brakes to an ineffective and wildly out of control President.
     
  6. PracticalMac macrumors 68030

    PracticalMac

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    #6
    "ineffective and wildly out of control"??

    you joking? Those statements contradict!
    How can something be "out of control", wildly even, when it is "ineffective" at doing anything??
    IOW, you just said the President is incapable of doing much, if anything.
     
  7. .Andy macrumors 68030

    .Andy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Location:
    The Mergui Archipelago
    #7
    Sounds like 2/3 of likely primary voters are morons who are seduced by divisive, xenophobic, knee-jerk, expensive, and utterly undeliverable policy. As are 18% of Democratic voters.
     
  8. stylinexpat macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2009
    #8
  9. thermodynamic Suspended

    thermodynamic

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #9
    Banning is extreme. Vetting is a fair compromise, even if it takes time and money for the needed resources. But banning is cheaper, is all that matters, and there are certainly no consequences to that... or are there? Has Trump's supporters asked that yet? I've not kept up with any of the candidates and should...
     

Share This Page