UK to invade Zimbabwe ???

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Macky-Mac, Nov 18, 2007.

  1. Macky-Mac macrumors 68030

    Macky-Mac

    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    #1
    hmmmm, what are you Brits up to now??

    from a BBC report; the full report

     
  2. Swarmlord macrumors 6502a

    Swarmlord

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    #2
    Is there anyone outside his immediate family that would miss Robert Mugabe?
     
  3. Desertrat macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2003
    Location:
    Terlingua, Texas
    #3
    HMG threw Ian Smith to the wolves; I rather doubt there's been any major epiphany in Merrye Olde England.

    At the rate things are going in Africa, at some point Zimbabwe and South Arica could have a championship football match, calling it the Toilet Bowl. Mugabe could go down to the plumber's and be a Plumber's Friend.

    The only way Mugabe would be missed would be if the sights were misaligned. That nutzoidal lunatic is the perfect candidate for retroactive birth control.

    'Rat
     
  4. pseudobrit macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #4
    Hook, line and sinker. They'd never suspect the PPP to be the true culprits...
     
  5. edesignuk Moderator emeritus

    edesignuk

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2002
    Location:
    London, England
    #5
    The Zimbabwean government is completely crackers.
     
  6. arkitect macrumors 601

    arkitect

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Location:
    Bath, United Kingdom
    #6
    Wow! I never knew Zimbabwe is an Oil-producing country? :rolleyes:

    Isn't that what gets Western governments all concerned about "human rights violations" and looking for excuses to invade and overthrow?

    Pity Zimbabwe only has Tobacco… not exacty an in-demand commodity these days.
     
  7. Queso macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    #7
    These are currently South Africa's glory years. You wait until Zuma takes over, then you'll see just how good ZA has it now.
     
  8. arkitect macrumors 601

    arkitect

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Location:
    Bath, United Kingdom
    #8
    So you reckon Mbeki is not going to get his life-presidency? :confused:;)
     
  9. Queso macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    #9
    Not with Jacob waiting in the wings. Not a chance.
     
  10. arkitect macrumors 601

    arkitect

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Location:
    Bath, United Kingdom
    #10
    I guess I have to agree… either way it isn't going to be pretty. :(
     
  11. Stella macrumors 604

    Stella

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Canada
    #11
    There's no way the UK could invade any country these days - it just doesn't have a large enough resources to mount such an operation ( Army, RAF, Navy ). Also there's Iraq and Afganistan commitments.

    It couldn't mount another Falklands operation if required.

    The UK policy is that it won't go to war on its own - only with other countries participating.

    Mugabe blames everyone but himself. Zim. used to be the food bowl of the region.. until they took over the white farms. Strangely (NOT!!), the white farm owners didn't want to help the new owners... Mugable, through its stupidity alone has crippled that country.
     
  12. Desertrat macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2003
    Location:
    Terlingua, Texas
    #12
    "...the white farm owners didn't want to help the new owners..."

    Sorta hard to help when you're run out of your ancestral home, or have any advice ignored. The handwriting on the wall was obvious many, many years ago. My question has always been why didn't the white farmers bail out ASAP? It was patently obvious they were doomed.

    When you enter into kleptocracy, thugocracy or a Chavez-style socialism, an economy is pretty much gone to the toilet.

    'Rat
     
  13. Queso macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    #13
    It should be remembered that the ancestors of the "white farm owners" stole the land in the first place.

    However, the British Government offered money to Zimbabwe to buy back the land from the then current owners, which would have allowed the farm workers to continue producing food from the land itself, only working for the Zim Government rather than a private individual. Mugabe however felt that this would be rewarding the farm owners for their forefathers' theft so sent in his lieutenants, who not only ran the owners off the land but prevented those that had worked for them from working it afterwards. As a result, food production fell through the floor, and the Zim economy headed down the porcelain bowl.
     
  14. Desertrat macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2003
    Location:
    Terlingua, Texas
    #14
    "Stole" the land? The long-extant problem with that sort of idea is that if land is not being used or lived on but merely travelled across, who "owns" it?

    The history of civilization is transitioning from nomadism to agrarian. The only difference between Area A and Area B is the timeline.

    So, your group moves into unutilized lands which are suitable for farming and ranching and you establish a culture. A few generations later and you feel like you are as much a part of that land as anybody on earth could be. You really don't want a bunch of outsider town-clowns coming in to try to wipe out your lifestyle, to ruin your world.

    We had the same sort of problem in the U.S., when the farmers started moving into country which previously had only been used for ranching.

    And who'd want to be a government employee under a Mugabe? That would exemplify the same smarts as opting for major surgery without anesthetic.

    'Rat
     
  15. Queso macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    #15
    The entire world didn't develop as the USA did. Zimbabwe was the centre of the Mutapa Empire long before the Portuguese started the European settlements in the area. It had two staples to its economy, agriculture and gold mining. So the land was "stolen" in this case.
     
  16. Swarmlord macrumors 6502a

    Swarmlord

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    #16
    Well said. Bravo.
     
  17. bigandy macrumors G3

    bigandy

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Location:
    Murka
    #17
    Surely most countries have a policy that they only go to war when there are other participants? :p
     
  18. Cloudane macrumors 65816

    Cloudane

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Location:
    Sweet Apple Acres
    #18
    First time I've heard of it!

    Just some crackpot accusation from a crackpot dictatorship.
     
  19. Queso macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    #19
    Too right. And they could invade in 45 minutes too :D
     
  20. Cloudane macrumors 65816

    Cloudane

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Location:
    Sweet Apple Acres
  21. Peterkro macrumors 68020

    Peterkro

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Location:
    Communard de Londres
    #21
    Interesting point here about "nomadism" and "agrarian",that fact being the nomads (hunter gatherers) stayed essentially in their own areas,the agrarians on the other hand have wandered and plundered the face of the earth.So you can see " nomads" is a bit of a false title.

    As for the white farmers in Zimbabwe (and South Africa and many other countries) tossing them out of the country with nothing would be my preferred solution.
     
  22. Stella macrumors 604

    Stella

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Canada
    #22
    Yep, I don't blame them for not helping either... they'd be pretty bloody bitter.

    Civil War! :p

    Read the article, the British government did actually talk about a possible invasion, and seek advise from the army. Though I'd expect it was fairly routine. Mugabe is even more senile than GWBush.
     
  23. Cloudane macrumors 65816

    Cloudane

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Location:
    Sweet Apple Acres
    #23
    I did read the article, and your point in bold is the key. They have plans for just about every scenario, probably including throwing nukes around. Possibly even at our allies. It's good to plan for every possible scenario, however absurd it may be, when it comes to war.

    This certainly doesn't mean there's any intention to carry those plans out... someone once holding a discussion about it with Mr Blair doesn't constitute an intended invasion IMO.

    Not that I'd oppose the idea of taking down that murdering scum, preferably through careful assassinations rather than wading in killing everything in sight like we did with Iraq.
     
  24. arkitect macrumors 601

    arkitect

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Location:
    Bath, United Kingdom
    #24
    Ok… so then what? :confused:


    Food production in Africa is always a desperate affair — even with well-organised farms…

    Just rely on food-Aid? :rolleyes:

    A Shamba-system doesn't feed a hungry nation.

    Oh and on a related note… Ian Smith dead.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/7104552.stm
     
  25. Macky-Mac thread starter macrumors 68030

    Macky-Mac

    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    #25
    That's not a solution to any problem. It's simply a racist vendetta.

    Whatever happened with revolutionaries and their opposition to racism? That used to be a key tennet of any revolutionary's program, but now it seems so many have embraced positions that promote ethnic and racial hatred.

    It's like the world has gone backwards.
     

Share This Page