US Army gets new Camo Pattern...$5 billion later.

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Technarchy, Aug 1, 2014.

  1. Technarchy macrumors 603

    Technarchy

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    #1
    Budget cuts. Benefit reductions. Witch hunts to get down headcount among enlisted and officers down...$1 TRILLION for the F35

    And here we are, the Army has finally selected a new camo pattern to replace the abhorrent ACU UCP (Universal-LOL-Camo-Pattern).

    That new pattern is Scorpion W2 or OCP.

    And here it is...

    [​IMG]

    It replaces this cluster...

    [​IMG]

    The cluster of UCP and adoption of OCP is interesting because back in 2004 the Army had the chance to use something very similar to Scorpion W2 called Multicam.

    Army didn't want to paying a licensing arrangement to the pattern owners so they went with their own 3 color digital UCP.

    AND IT SUCKED!!!! It flat out doesn't work in most environments. So what does the army do? Double down and spend $5 billion on UCP uniforms and gear. Well soldiers keep bitching because it still doesn't work. All operators start buying Multicam, while the big army rabble are saddled with the digital nightmare.

    Well here we are...doing in 2014 what we had the chance to do in 2004. UCP was supposed to save money, well it's already $5, billion in the hole as far as I am concerned.

    Tax dollars at work.
     
  2. noodlemanc macrumors regular

    noodlemanc

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Location:
    Australasia
    #2
    Ah, just imagine how rich our species could be if we did away with all this sort of ****.
     
  3. Chundles macrumors G4

    Chundles

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2005
    #3
    Wait, so the US army has been in Afghanistan/Iraq since 2001 in a uniform made mostly of different shades of green?
     
  4. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #4

    And? You think we go places and blow **** up without having our uniforms matching the money we spend?
     
  5. satcomer macrumors 603

    satcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Location:
    The Finger Lakes Region
    #5
    So since I was born we went from the solid green to pickle to pixelated to now less pixelated. :D
     
  6. G51989 macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #6

    I am not a military man, I'm a drinker and a lover, not a fighter.


    But I never got the digital camo thing, I mean how CAN"T you see it in almost every environment?
     
  7. Technarchy thread starter macrumors 603

    Technarchy

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    #7
    You don't say...

    [​IMG]
     
  8. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #8
    I think the pixelated camo was meant for urban environments. In any case, there is still a lot of research on what makes good camouflage. Seems to me that many armies in Asia were onto something - wearing actual branches on their helmets and uniform.

    In any case, is the 5 billion for the research or for replacing the uniforms? If it is the later, then let us hope the uniforms last awhile...
     
  9. Huntn macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #9
    Obviously lunatics are in charge of the asylum. :(
     
  10. Technarchy thread starter macrumors 603

    Technarchy

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    #10
    Given the constant budgetary issues guys on the ground deal with, watching $5 billion get pissed into the wind certainly grinds my gears.

    The new camo will be great, it's just a decade and two wars too late.
     
  11. Huntn macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #11
    That price tag, if it is just for the development of new camo is so offensive it's another strike against the military-industrial complex. If it is to supply new uniforms, I'd like to know how much that works out per an individual set- shirt, pants, and hat. Our financial priorities are going to be this nations undoing.
     
  12. Technarchy thread starter macrumors 603

    Technarchy

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    #12
    That $5 billion was the cost for deploying the old pattern. One can assume the new pattern will be another $5 billion to get fully deployed.

    That's a lot of money. Criminal potentially considering we had the chance to use scorpion W2 in 2004 and the army passed on it.
     
  13. Huntn, Aug 2, 2014
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2014

    Huntn macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #13
    I guess when you give people an unlimited budget, this can be the result. I still want to know what that's works out to be per set.. :mad:
     
  14. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #14
    The U.S. military spends and wastes a crap-load of tax dollars?

    Who knew?

    But for anyone interested, here's a short article from The Economist on the subject ...

    So the same company, Crye Precision, makes both versions and wants to charge more for the one that actually works? Considering the money at stake it's amazing to me that this can't be negotiated. If I were to guess, I'd say it's connected to the 2012 GAO investigation into uniform costs. There are now more eyeballs watching the process and working to keep the cost down ... at the expense of the soldier.
     
  15. Southern Dad macrumors 65816

    Southern Dad

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Location:
    Georgia
    #15
    After the initial issue of uniforms in BASIC training, our ARMY service members purchase their own replacement uniforms. Enlisted are given an allowance each year to do this, it's currently $306 for males and $327 for females. Officers purchase their own clothing after the initial allowance without reimbursement.

    While I was in the service, the uniforms changed from the green utility uniforms to the woodlands camouflage uniforms. There was no exchanging the old for new. You simply purchased your new ones to replace the old during the phase out period.

    Old uniforms won't just be gathered up and replaced with new ones wasting all that money. There are exceptions where uniforms are swapped such as deployment into a hostile theater of operations, uniforms destroyed due to a combat injury, uniforms that are destroyed when rendering aid to another. This is all covered by the AR 670-1.
     
  16. Happybunny macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    #16
    That might all be true but the US forces main threat now in Afghanistan are their own allies!

    Camo doesn't help then.
    Green on Blue attacks

    It has been more than a decade since U.S. and allied troops rolled into Afghanistan to battle insurgents linked to al-Qaeda.

    Violence is still rampant in the South Asian country of 35 million; ethnic divisions, political corruption and a still-active insurgency continue to threaten civilians’ safety. But a planned drawdown will have nearly all foreign forces out of the war-torn country by the end of next year.

    International troops are still suffering casualties, even as the war draws to a close. For those soldiers, militant insurgents are not the only ones who pose a threat. Members of Afghan security forces, who are allies, are often the ones to point their guns at members of the coalition.

    These insider attacks account for a significant percentage of ISAF deaths in Afghanistan; last year, the figure was 15 percent. The incidents are referred to as green-on-blue attacks, in accordance with a color-coding system used by the U.S. military where blue represents American forces and green represents allies. (Enemies are red.)

    The frequency of insider attacks has become something of a yardstick for the international operation, which has the ultimate goal of entrusting Afghan troops with domestic security. As U.S. and other troops prepare to lighten their footprint, one question becomes increasingly important: Are green-on-blue attacks -- which should be inversely proportional to mission success -- on the decline?

    It would seem so at first glance. The situation has certainly calmed down since 2012, which was the worst year on record for insider attacks.

    Figures from The Long War Journal, which uses military data and media reports to keep a running tally of attacks committed against foreign troops by Afghan police or military members, indicate that 44 insider attacks occurred in 2012, up from 16 the year before and five the year before that.

    The 44 green-on-blue attacks last year killed 61 members of the international coalition currently engaged in Afghanistan, including troops and support personnel. 35 people were killed by insider attacks in 2011, and 16 in 2010. Helmand and Kandahar provinces are the most dangerous by far, followed by Kabul Province -- which includes the capital city of Kabul -- and Wardak Province.

    http://www.ibtimes.com/green-blue-fade-black-are-insider-attacks-drawing-down-afghanistan-1120935
     
  17. Technarchy, Aug 2, 2014
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2014

    Technarchy thread starter macrumors 603

    Technarchy

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    #17
    Just some clarification.

    Crye designed Multicam and Scorpion W2.

    Crye owns Multicam. They didn't want to give up rights to the army. The army didn't wan't to pay licensing fees to use Multicam, which would increase the cost quite a bit.

    The army did issue Multicam on a limited basis for use in Afghanistan as a stopgap measure.

    Army then has Crye design Scorpion W2, which is similar to Multicam but not the same...it's close though.

    The difference? The USA Army OWNS Scorpian W2, so Crye is not paid licensing fees per garment.

    At a glance, you might fail to notice the difference. I wore Multicam in Afghanistan it works much better than ACU UCP.

    The differences are subtle.

    [​IMG]

    The Army is mimicking what the British did for their camo. They didn't want to pay Crye so they had Crye design something similar that they would own.

    Here is Prince Harry in the Crye designed MTP (Multi-terrain-Pattern)

    [​IMG]

    Subtle difference in looks. Big difference in ownership.
     
  18. tevion5 macrumors 68000

    tevion5

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Location:
    Ireland
    #18
    I love your signature.
     
  19. Technarchy thread starter macrumors 603

    Technarchy

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    #19
    Everyone has an opinion. Not all opinions are equal.

    I'll use my my own experiences in a combat zone over any keyboard commando-ing.
     
  20. samiwas macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    #20
    Now let's all just step back and realize that no amount of military spending is too much.
     
  21. aaronvan Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #21
    Looks like the multicam we've been wearing downrange for years.
     
  22. AustinIllini macrumors demi-god

    AustinIllini

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #22
    $5 billion dollar for a uni with retina display. Seems like quite a markup. Thanks, Obama.;)
     
  23. G51989 macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #23
    So if soldiers have to pay for their own uniform?


    Why are the taxpayers on the line for 5 billion dollars?
     
  24. noodlemanc macrumors regular

    noodlemanc

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Location:
    Australasia
    #24

    For "researching" the design ;)
     
  25. Shrink macrumors G3

    Shrink

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Location:
    New England, USA
    #25
    Wait...are there pictures in Post# 1?!

    That camo is so good I can't see therm!

    Money well spent...:rolleyes:
     

Share This Page