What I don't get: Why doesn't apple acquire companies like corning?

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by brinycbri, Jun 4, 2012.

  1. brinycbri, Jun 4, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 4, 2012

    brinycbri macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    #1
    I mean they can edge the competition out if they just acquire corning, gorilla glass, that new thing that makes the iphone waterproof, and other pivotal companies that everyone uses.

    Any idea why they just don't do that?
     
  2. basesloaded190 macrumors 68030

    basesloaded190

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    #2
    They aren't for sale?
     
  3. lordofthereef macrumors G4

    lordofthereef

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2011
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #3
    Monopoly issues, most likely.

    ----------

    Or this.
     
  4. bigsexyy81 macrumors 6502a

    bigsexyy81

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    #4
    Corning is huge. It wouldn't be a little purchase.

    Consumer electronics glass is only a part of their business. They are also the leading manufacturer of fiber optic glass in the world.
     
  5. isoft7 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    #5
    Because then Apple would be in the dinner plate business. Not exactly a strategic move that would sit well with the share holders.
     
  6. kdarling macrumors demi-god

    kdarling

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Location:
    Cabin by a lake
    #6
    Man, if we each had a nickel for every time someone wanted Apple to buy up a company... we could've bought Apple! :)

    Not long ago, Apple paid an unspecified amount for a perpetual license to use Liquid Metal (tm) in consumer electronics devices.

    So Samsung, who had been using it for years for phone hinges and trim, stopped using it. No big loss for them. In turn, Apple has never used it except for their SIM ejection tool.

    Pretty much a waste of money all around so far. Didn't hurt Samsung. Hasn't helped Apple. And probably wasn't a good idea longterm for the inventors.

    If Apple bought rights to Gorilla Glass, it would probably be a loss for Corning, and it wouldn't prevent similar glass from being invented or used.

    Not to mention that the last thing you want to do, is force your competitors to come up with something else just as good or better. At that moment your attempt at locking down the older method becomes moot.
     
  7. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #7
  8. prvt.donut macrumors 6502a

    prvt.donut

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2008
    #8
    If they did, I would hope that they allowed them to still sell to other companies, my Sony Bravia uses Gorilla glass too!
     
  9. brinycbri thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    #9
    funny how some of you get so pissy about reading this thread, just don't read it lol...

    i mean i feel that they would get a better return on investment than repurchasing shares, it's not like they need additional rewards to shareholders for a higher total return

    you're right, corning doesn't make sense because it's so huge at like 20b market cap..

    but like liquid metal they could...and a jv is different
     
  10. JAT macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2001
    Location:
    Mpls, MN
  11. ChrisTX macrumors 68030

    ChrisTX

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2009
    Location:
    Texas
    #11
    This reminds me of the whole "Apple is going to buy Sony" rumors. Never going to happen.
     
  12. quietstormSD macrumors 6502a

    quietstormSD

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2010
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    #12
    I think they just don't want to create the glass for their iPhone in house. It's probably better for them to purchase it from a 3rd party (Corning). And if something comes out that is better than Corning Gorilla glass Apple can go to that other company and purchase there glass or whatever from them.

    You have to understand that just about every end product that Apple makes (laptops, desktops, phones, music players etc), all the individual parts that goes into making that end product are from at least hundreds of other companies.
     
  13. ejb190 macrumors 65816

    ejb190

    #13
    Given that Apple seems to have some expertise with construction glass (see the Apple Stores) it would make a certain amount of sense. However, look at Corning's whole profile. Ceramic Substrates, Diesel Particulate Filters, Fiber Optics, Fluoride Crystals, Custom Materials. If you are good at consumer electronics, why in the world would you want to dive into material science and chemistry?

    In fact, look at the food processing industry. It seems someone is always buying one product line or another, mining the profit out of it, mismanaging it, then selling it to someone else. It's not that they have a speciality or interest in, oh say peanuts or ice cream. It's the fact that brand is making money.

    Personally, I think Apple has been very wise with their acquisitions. Over-reach is the one thing you want to avoid.
     
  14. Funkymonk macrumors 6502a

    Funkymonk

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    #14
    Gorilla glass is like a must have feature in any high end device though. Would be messed up if only Apple could use it. There might be monopoly issues perhaps.
     
  15. macMD macrumors 6502

    macMD

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    Location:
    New York
    #15
    If anything Apple could offer to make an exclusive license of Gorilla Glass or some special variant, but Corning does far more than just consumer products. Most of their business does not fit within Apple's core competencies or products.
     
  16. sulpfiction macrumors 68030

    sulpfiction

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Location:
    Philadelphia Area
    #16
    Why doesn't apple just buy Google and call it a day?:rolleyes:
     
  17. Sedrick macrumors 68030

    Sedrick

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2010
    #17
    I think Apple should just by America. I hear it's going cheap.
     
  18. jwingfie macrumors 6502a

    jwingfie

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Location:
    Athens, GA
  19. isoft7 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    #19
    :D:D:D

    His name IS Tim Cook is it not??? ;)
     
  20. nostresshere macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    #20
  21. Rodimus Prime macrumors G4

    Rodimus Prime

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    #21
    Umm just because Apple stores use glass does not mean they have any experience in building with it. The architecture company might and the gc who built but more it would really be the sub who put it together and did a bulk of the design work to meet the requirements.

    Sorry but the share amount of stuff wrong in this post is beyond sad.
     
  22. BaldiMac macrumors 604

    BaldiMac

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    #22
    What was actually wrong in the post? Other than your assumption that Apple has no expertise with construction glass despite Steve Jobs clearly implying that they did?
     
  23. Rodimus Prime macrumors G4

    Rodimus Prime

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    #23
    It was saying they have all this experience with it. Yeah a lot of stories have it and they know what looks pretty.

    As someone who has worked in commercial construction it had problems left and right.

    Also what Steve Jobs imply means very little. Apple would of given it to a general contractor who would of given that part of the job to a sub.
     
  24. BaldiMac macrumors 604

    BaldiMac

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    #24
    What you would assume Apple would have done means even less that what Steve Jobs implied. The claim isn't wrong because you assume it is. Apple even applied for a patent for the glass design of the Shanghai store. I think it's reasonable to assume that Apple has had significant involvement in the design of the glass features in many of their flagship stores and their new headquarters.
     
  25. mrsir2009 macrumors 604

    mrsir2009

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #25
    Or maybe they should buy Samsung :rolleyes:
     

Share This Page