Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by squeeks, Sep 16, 2008.
it goes both ways guys: OP
I might be (well, must be) missing some background to this or irony, or something , but what a load of crap.
edit: oh, I get it.
to each his own, i think the republican ones area load of crap
Oh yeah. The list of Republican failures ("Why I'm voting Republican" thread) is comparable to your list of right wing straw men.
There's barely a word of truth to your list. It's just a bunch of extreme right wing talking points.
There's plenty to pick on the Democrats for. Unfortunately, you didn't include it in this list. Start over, and this time try being a bit more honest. You think the Republican one is crap? I'd like proof please.
Yeah, if this list was more in the style of the one it is in response to it would have a little more validity. Granted I also don't completely agree with the other, it's just the first one seemed like it was more lighthearted where as this is an angry response to the other post.
I will agree with lee^^^
I am 100% positive you can find things to pick on the Dems for, but your list is just a bunch of smart ass remarks with little basis. Some of them have nothing to do with politics and are just a bunch of school yard name calling
Republicans = "Me, me, me, mine, mine, mine"?
Because I dont want a WW3!
No hostilities wanted please!
And that is why so many people will not vote Republican.
Seriously, this is the worst comeback since Neville Chamberlain got off his plane from Munich in 1938, claiming that peace was here to stay.
So immature it's unreal.
I'm still looking for the valid points in the list so that I can try to respond to anything, except I am finding name calling, Muslim-hating, uninformed rhetoric. And I thought this would be a great thread to see other points of view.
"Im voting Democrat because I care about the real victims of crime criminals."
Ok, ill agree with that one, but thats it
That's the neocon MO- appeal to the emotions, not the intellect.
Funny- that used to be the "liberal" MO. My how times have changed.
Ya know, it actually is frightening that there are people who really believe that bull about Democrats. At the risk of sounding Coulterish, I really wonder about the sanity of such people. They are in a different world from the rest of us.
Wow. Someone was aiming for satire but landed smack in the middle of stupid.
Anyone who doesn't already think the Republican one is crap will never be convinced. Even if the proof is laid out right in front of them.
Is that your final answer? I'd actually like to see refutation of that list (in the appropriate thread of course). More information is always better.
Really? Care to address it point by point? I'd really like you to debunk the one about Limbaugh's drug addiction. I really would like you to address that hypocrisy. Go down the rest of the list and tell me exactly how they aren't true.
How come we're not getting any answers?
If you can honestly sit there and claim that the republican version is accurate, and this one is bull-crap... then... wow. Just, wow.
Your bias is astounding, sir. The fact that you're demanding someone to give you reasons why the republican version wasn't accurate is pretty telling, and in the same breath claim that this one is a total and complete farce is incredibly amusing to me! Talk about BLINDERS!
Haha, anyway... enjoy that.
Debunk some points then, FFS.
The Democrat version at least raises some serious points instead of the polemic-stuffed, childish attempt at satire that might as well have been written by a 10 year old with alphabetty spaghetti.
Yep- Let's start with the very first one. When Limbaugh became a drug addict, all his followers felt sorry for him. He just needed "help". These are the very same people who scream that drug addicts need to be locked up. For some reason, when Limbaugh's an addict, everyone gets all touchy-feely-lovey. If it's anyone else (non-conservative), well- you know the reaction.
Would you really like us to continue?
BTW- I'm not the only one asking. Several other posters have as well. Your bias is astounding.
^ Meanwhile, the 'balanced other side' provides this gem:
Homosexuals = goats. What logic.
You're also missing the fact a Bonobo is:
That's the one comment that show what childish prats the Republicans really are.
"Bonobos, goats, parrots, homosexuals. They're all the same."