I was skimming Wired's site, and came across this article about a DNA test that can determine the racial background of the source. What I found disturbing is that so many officials find it disturbing. I don't understand their line of thought that finding race in DNA could lead to "why they committed the crime" in DNA. This seems no different to me than using DNA to determine if the suspect has a penis or a vagina. I mean, is there any rational argument for not using this test (other than cost - which I imagine would come down over time)? What's with all of this letting emotion and historic belief get in the way of science. No different than trying to stop evolution.