Why you should not vote for Hillary Clinton

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by thewap, Feb 28, 2016.

  1. thewap macrumors demi-god

    thewap

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    #1
    In this video Luke Rudkowski breaks down critically important information about Hillary Clinton's Presidential announcement and her personal history.

     
  2. Robisan macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    #2
    Welp, it only took 45 seconds and the first assertion of the video to find the first flat out lie. How many more spamming, lying videos will you be posting?
     
  3. thewap thread starter macrumors demi-god

    thewap

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    #3
    Source of your assertions please - thank you.

    Oh SNOPES ! LMAO!
     
  4. aaronvan Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #4
    I'd vote for Hillary except that she supports NAFTA and the off-shoring of millions of American jobs, supported the DOMA, supported the repeal of Glass-Steagall which resulted in the destruction of the American economy
    and the American middle class, accepted bribes and laundered the money as "cattle futures," destroyed the reputation of rape victims to defend her rapist husband, blames Bill for Webb Hubble's daughter's tremendous overbite, voted for and supported George W. Bush's illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq, conducted regime-change in Libya, continues to support regime-change in Syria, supported TPP and the off-shoring of millions of American jobs, supported Keystone XL, was a very unremarkable SecState, received millions of dollars from Goldman-Sachs and other Wall Street criminals, yet refuses to release the transcripts of her speeches, and she is a "congenital liar" married to "an unusually good liar."

    Otherwise, she's great!
     
  5. mudslag macrumors regular

    mudslag

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    #5

    To be fair, if you have a problem with snopes or even the counter point being made, then you should post why it's wrong with your own source.
     
  6. thewap, Feb 28, 2016
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2016

    thewap thread starter macrumors demi-god

    thewap

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    #6
    OK -
    http://accuracyinpolitics.blogspot.com/2013/05/snopes-got-snoped.html

    Snopes.com has been considered the 'tell-all final word' on any comment, claim and email. Once negative article by them and people point and say, "See, I told you it wasn't true!" But what is Snopes? What are their methods and training that gives them the authority to decide what is true and what is not? For several years people have tried to find out who exactly was behind the website Snopes.com. Only recently did they get to the bottom of it. Are you ready for this?

    It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators scouring public records in Washington, no researchers studying historical stacks in libraries, no team of lawyers reaching a consensus on current caselaw.
    No, Snopes.com is just a mom-and-pop operation that was started by two people who have absolutely no formal background or experience in investigative research.
     
  7. FieldingMellish Suspended

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    #7
    A Hillary run might have us seeing her get back at Bill by blowing a male page in the Oval Office.
     
  8. mudslag macrumors regular

    mudslag

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    #8


    And yet that still doesn't mean the info is inaccurate. Again you, you're disputing the source and not the material. If you have a problem with what snopes says, show why the info is wrong. Whining about snopes itself doesn't dispute what's said. What you're doing is deflecting.
     
  9. Rhonindk macrumors 68020

    Rhonindk

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2014
    Location:
    Bloom County: Meadow Party
    #9
    a seriously desperate page :eek:
     
  10. thewap thread starter macrumors demi-god

    thewap

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    #10
    Keep quoting snopes then, it will make you very politically savy *in your own mind*. :D
     
  11. mudslag macrumors regular

    mudslag

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    #11

    I never quoted it but keep on deflecting.
     
  12. SwiftLives macrumors 65816

    SwiftLives

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2001
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    #12
    And yet, Snopes lists its sources.

    Are you saying they aren't credible because there are only two people running it? And they aren't researches because they research political myths and you don't agree with the truth?

    Your lack of credibility is making it seem like you are very afraid of Hillary Clinton. And that just makes me like her more.
     
  13. Robisan macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    #13
    Meanwhile there's nothing that debunks the well-researched material at the Snopes link. Here's another source by Carl Cannon at Real Clear Politics.
     
  14. thermodynamic Suspended

    thermodynamic

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #14
    But mom and pop stores are healthy for an economy! Competition is good! Regulations would just drive this company under!
     
  15. Macky-Mac macrumors 68030

    Macky-Mac

    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    #15
    Is that the same 9/11 truther Luke Rudkowski (or Milewski as some in the 9/11 truther community claim his name is) who was accused of embezzling donations to WeAreChange? charged and convicted in CL Court it appears.
     
  16. thewap thread starter macrumors demi-god

    thewap

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    #16
    Character assassination of any witnesses to Hillary's shenanigans is the hallmark of Hillary's political backing and pattern to obfuscate any testimony against her.
    http://www.msfanpage.link/hillary-c...-and-dishonest-but-i-bet-you-didnt-know-this/
     
  17. thewitt macrumors 68020

    thewitt

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    #17
    Not just character assassination...don't forget Vince Foster
     
  18. Macky-Mac macrumors 68030

    Macky-Mac

    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    #18

    you're retreating into denial which reveals that you need to open your mind and stop hiding from facts that you don't want to learn about.

    Anyway, the indictment and evidence against Rudkowski (or Milewski if that he's real name) can be found online when you're ready to stop deceiving yourself.
     
  19. thekev macrumors 604

    thekev

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    #19
    Kenneth Starr spent a significant amount of time on that case, yet he couldn't dig up anything. It seems you are going to cling to that one forever based on bizarre circumstances and speculation of motive.
     
  20. thewap thread starter macrumors demi-god

    thewap

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    #20
    An indictment does not evidence make..
     
  21. Macky-Mac macrumors 68030

    Macky-Mac

    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    #21
    in this case the indictment contains copies of the evidence (bank statements, wire transfers, etc)
     
  22. aaronvan Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #22
    His blood ran...uphill. :eek:
     
  23. thewap thread starter macrumors demi-god

    thewap

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    #23
  24. Macky-Mac macrumors 68030

    Macky-Mac

    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    #24
  25. thewap thread starter macrumors demi-god

    thewap

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    #25
    Indictment by a common court of law..right....and if embezzling of funds was found to be true, wouldn't a real civil or criminal lawsuit be more appropriate? Or referenced to authorities? Again I repeat, indictment is not proof of wrongdoing (especially in a common court of law) , it is a precursor to have if enough evidence for the matter to proceed and be resolved at trial. Indictments do not prove anything at all.
     

Share This Page