Wikileaks Phase 3

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Herdfan, Nov 1, 2016.

Most Liked Posts
  1. Herdfan, Nov 1, 2016

    Herdfan macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    #1
    It has been reported in a couple of places (don't care if you don't like the reporting source because it doesn't necessarily mean they are wrong) that Wikileaks is about to launch Phase 3.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...t-launching-phase-three-its-election-coverage

    And it has been reported by Kim Dotcom (yeah I know, but it doesn't mean he isn't correct) that it will be Hillary's 33,000 emails.

    http://www.infowars.com/is-wikileaks-about-to-release-hillarys-33000-deleted-emails/

    So, will it matter? If it turns out she was hacked and Russia ( and now everyone since Wikileaks doesn't redact) had access to some of our secrets, is she done?
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
    thermodynamic likes this.
  2. steve knight, Nov 1, 2016

    steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #2
    Since they don't release anything from the Donald I don't really think much of it anymore
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
    Dagless likes this.
  3. Herdfan, Nov 1, 2016

    Herdfan thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    #3
    So if Hillary's bad judgement allowed Russia access to our secrets you don't care because they haven't made Donald look bad?
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
    zin and webbuzz like this.
  4. BoxerGT2.5, Nov 1, 2016

    BoxerGT2.5 macrumors 68000

    BoxerGT2.5

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    #4
    Will it matter? I guess it all depends on what's in them. I mean if there's some bombshell it could possible cause independents to just stay home disgusted with their choices. It would have to be very bad for her to resign her candidacy. Regardless, we won't know if she's in deep deep deep deep **** until after the election. In which case we could end up with Tim Kaine which would be the equivalent to letting Tom Eagleton or Spiro Agnew take the wheel.
    --- Post Merged, Nov 1, 2016 ---
    They need to have fair and balanced espionage for it to mean anything.
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
    shyam09, thermodynamic, Dagless and 2 others like this.
  5. thermodynamic, Nov 1, 2016

    thermodynamic Suspended

    thermodynamic

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #5
    Assuming they had much of anything, or much of anything that could be used. Plenty of speculation, but it's nothing Snowden wouldn't be proud of had he released anything and he's already a big slimeball.
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
  6. mrkramer, Nov 1, 2016

    mrkramer Suspended

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #6
    It means they are biased and based on everything else we know about Trump they are likely ignoring just as bad of things.
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
  7. steve knight, Nov 1, 2016

    steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #7
    if trump wealth with Russia and made profits from it? so far what we have seen is donald dealing with Russia.
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)

Share This Page