You could be arrested in Arizona just for planning a protest

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Thomas Veil, Feb 24, 2017.

  1. Thomas Veil macrumors 68020

    Thomas Veil

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Location:
    OBJECTIVE reality
    #1
    This is just un-American:

    And the justification?

    This "paid protester" BS that is being pushed by the right wing media is a slap in the face to all Americans. And speaking of non-organic, wouldn't it be something if we found out this "law" originated with ALEC?

    So now Arizona may have a "law" that is justified via propaganda that is also supported by the White House. And if this passes and/or other states start taking up similar laws, I have to ask...

    Do you still think fascism isn't coming to America?
     
  2. AlliFlowers Contributor

    AlliFlowers

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Location:
    L.A. (Lower Alabama)
    #2
    Sounds to me like it's unconstitutional. I hope it goes to court.
     
  3. flyinmac macrumors 68030

    flyinmac

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Location:
    United States
    #3
    The old test built into the law is intent.

    You can assemble and speak peacefully if your intent is to convey an idea without antagonizing, or inciting a riot.

    We have the freedom of speech, but it is limited and rightfully so, to maintain peace.

    It has been very clear that anti-Trump protests are meant to stir up the public.

    Now, if they apply for a permit, and wish to peacefully assemble to sit in the park and meditate during a hunger strike, the government couldn't stop them.

    But if they want to shout out hate speech about any person, political party, etc. which everyone knows will stir up emotions and create a hostile environment, then it is the law to prevent it.

    Now, if the democrats wish to assemble and shout out their frustrations among themselves in a private location, they can do so.

    If they wish to do the same, but around people who are likely to have a different perspective, then they are intending (by definition of law) to incite a riot.

    As for those who assemble with them, even if you don't commit violence, the standard accessory to a crime does apply.

    Suppose you're out with friends. One decides to beat up an old lady. You stood there and watched. Legally, if you didn't try to stop it, and you didn't try to get authorities to help, you are an accessory to the crime.

    I have no love for Trump. But the riot act is getting ridiculous.
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/315/568

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fighting_words

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/first_amendment

    http://kellywarnerlaw.com/limits-on-free-speech/

    http://www.uscourts.gov/about-feder...ational-outreach/activity-resources/what-does
     
  4. steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #4
    So now Arizona is somehow going to judge who is doing a real protest and who is not? I can't see this law lasting any time at all.
     
  5. zin macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #5
    Your source says peaceful protest but the source's source says those who participate in violent protest.
     
  6. DrewDaHilp1 macrumors 6502a

    DrewDaHilp1

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    All Your Memes Are Belong to US
    #6
    Gotta love when protesters turn rioters and smash starbucks windows.
     
  7. noekozz macrumors 6502a

    noekozz

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Location:
    212/201
    #7
    Don't worry guys, in about a year or two this nation will turn into a Police State. Sessions is at the helm, and the combination of Bannon and Trump will see that this comes to fruition. First we build a wall and impose a travel ban in order to isolate ourselves and keep immigrants out, then we arrest those protesting against the government, and finally we suppress the free Press/Media from publishing negative content of any type in regards to the POTUS and the WH.

    Some may call me crazy, but it's already taking shape and Steve will make sure of that. Fear not guys, it's all part of our Make America Great campaign where we turn back the clock to the good ol days of rotor phones and women in the Kitchen where they belong.
     
  8. DrewDaHilp1 macrumors 6502a

    DrewDaHilp1

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    All Your Memes Are Belong to US
    #8

    --- Post Merged, Feb 24, 2017 ---
    "Gun Nuts" might not be so nuts now huh.
     
  9. LizKat macrumors 68040

    LizKat

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Location:
    Catskill Mountains
    #9
    It's completely unconstitutional.

    Because I march in a peaceful (if noisy!) protest or plan a peaceful (if noisy!) protest, I'm not responsible for some jerk comes along and breaks a window and yells "yeah get em! F the world!" For all I know the window breaking jerk is an anarchist or a provocateur from political opposition trying to get the marchers busted.

    Laws passed have consequences. The one referenced in this thread's OP links would sting the Tea Party or any other right-leaning group next time they feel like dragging out 2A references to taking out the ACA or any other legislation they don't care for. And of course it might not occur to these law-passing idiots that the next step in Trump's march to the OneTrueGod is fixing the commas in the 2A so it enables only HisMilitia to threaten to fix things in America at the point of a gun.
     

    Attached Files:

  10. steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #10
    no you don't have to love it but to deny protesters before they do anything is illegal.
     
  11. pdqgp macrumors 68020

    pdqgp

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    #11
    the left has been making claims about Trump before he actually does anything and it's okay.....hmm.....
     
  12. DrewDaHilp1 macrumors 6502a

    DrewDaHilp1

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    All Your Memes Are Belong to US
    #12
    This is for you Steve,



    "A. A person commits conspiracy if, with the intent to promote or aid the commission of an offense, such person agrees with one or more persons that at least one of them or another person will engage in conduct constituting the offense and one of the parties commits an overt act in furtherance of the offense, except that an overt act shall not be required if the object of the conspiracy was to commit any felony upon ON the person of another, or to commit an offense under section 13‑1508, or 13‑1704 OR 13‑2903.

    B. If a person guilty of conspiracy, as defined in subsection A of this section, knows or has reason to know that a person with whom such person conspires to commit an offense has conspired with another person or persons to commit the same offense, such person is guilty of conspiring to commit the offense with such other person or persons, whether or not such person knows their identity.

    C. A person who conspires to commit a number of offenses is guilty of only one conspiracy if the multiple offenses are the object of the same agreement or relationship and the degree of the conspiracy shall be determined by the most serious offense conspired to.

    D. Conspiracy to commit a class 1 felony is punishable by a sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of release on any basis until the service of twenty‑five years, otherwise, conspiracy is an offense of the same class as the most serious offense which is the object of or result of the conspiracy."


    Nowhere in the statute mentions that you can be jailed for planning a protest.
     
  13. Populism macrumors regular

    Populism

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2014
    #13
    "Rioter" is a pejorative term and it should be against the law to use it.

    The proper term for someone looting the Mom and Pop convenience store and destroying a Starbucks is "a Civil Disobedience-er."
     
  14. steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #14
    This has something to do with the subject how?
     
  15. DrewDaHilp1 macrumors 6502a

    DrewDaHilp1

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    All Your Memes Are Belong to US
    #15
    Well to be fair to the Antifa commies, I don't recall seeing them looting, just smashing.
     
  16. s2mikey macrumors 68020

    s2mikey

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2013
    Location:
    Upstate, NY
    #16
    Well, George Soros DID fund some of the protests so lets not pretend that doesnt happen. Many of thse so-called protesters are professionals. They are at EVERY protest. Thats what they "do". So pardon "normal" poeple for getting tired of the incessant whining and complaining. Geezus. Get a life. Maybe a job? Maybe a hobby?
     
  17. tgara macrumors 6502a

    tgara

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2012
    Location:
    Somewhere in the Delta Quadrant
    #17
    Now, now. You've been very wrong about conservatives in the past. I must again remind you of your previous rant about certain conservative groups starting violent riots. You were correct about the violence, but completely and totally wrong about who would be committing it, as illustrated in the various riots being committed since January 20.

    Correct on the violent methods. But it's the loony left wing progressives who are doing it, not conservatives. Objective reality, indeed. :rolleyes:

    And as to the "BS" about paid protestors, it's common knowledge that George Soros funds these deadbeats. Last year, there were ads on Craigslist. I think he pays $15/hour, which is more than they pay at McDonalds. No bennies, but good work if you can get it (provided you don't get arrested). :D
     
  18. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #18
    [​IMG]


    Who is "they"? You're saying there is a roving gang of individuals that are at every protest? Who? As in, you can point to individuals?
     
  19. BernyMac macrumors regular

    BernyMac

    Joined:
    May 18, 2015
    Location:
    USA
    #19
    I keep wondering if those same people who protest the Alec Baldwin impersonator and fear that he is ushering in a fascist order also want gun control???
     
  20. JayMysterio macrumors 6502

    JayMysterio

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Location:
    Rock Ridge
    #20
    Has anyone actually ever provided any physical documented proof or evidence of 'paid protesters'?

    I mean besides the O'Keefe related individual who wanted to hire people to riot at Trump's inauguration to falsely blame liberals? Is his organization the reason a law is needed?

    I've seen many times people blaming George Soros for everything liberal related, but they never show any documentation. This paid protester line has been trotted out, but I never see the money trail. And now laws are being passed on this supposed narrative? :confused:
     
  21. mrkramer macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #21
    Any source for that that isn't a conspiracy website? And anyone can post an ad on Craigslist for the purposes of trolling people who think that protesters are paid. The right is making the same mistake in dismissing these protesters that the left did in dismissing the tea party protesters, although at least the left just ignored them instead of trying to have them arrested.
     
  22. Mac'nCheese macrumors 68030

    Mac'nCheese

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    #22
    Would love to see that video continued. Does anyone call her on it? Does she say anything more? All the posted ones I see are cut off right after she says "our job"
     
  23. pat500000 macrumors 604

    pat500000

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    #23
    I wonder if these protesters have real jobs and not those paid jobs from Craigslist to scream and smash things.
     
  24. DrewDaHilp1 macrumors 6502a

    DrewDaHilp1

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    All Your Memes Are Belong to US
    #24
    I will look when I have access to sound. Remind me if I don't.
     
  25. JayMysterio macrumors 6502

    JayMysterio

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Location:
    Rock Ridge
    #25
    When you find one, ask them for all of us. We're dying to meet one and see them interviewed.
     

Share This Page